Why can't Rachel Dolezal be black? Why does it matter if someone's parents and grandparents or direct lineage is majority European descent if they sincerely identify with being black? Sooner or later you guys will need to be consistent.
Why can't Rachel Dolezal be black? Why does it matter if someone's parents and grandparents or direct lineage is majority European descent if they sincerely identify with being black? Sooner or later you guys will need to be consistent.
Um - well - what exactly is she identifying with? If her skin color is white and she identifies with "blacks" does that mean she identifies with other people who have white skin who call themselves black?
She is identifying as a black woman. She has already made that clear. So why can't she be black?
You didn't answer my question. If someone with white skin is identifying as "black", what exactly are they identifying with? I guess she can call herself a pink unicorn if she wishes, but what would it mean? Nothing.
I've decided to identify as "poor" so I can receive government aid. Why can't I do that?
I already answered it.
No, you're just talking in circles. Define "black" for me as you're using the term.
If marking "black" on a financial aid form increases your chances of receiving that aid, and if people can simply identify however they please, then why wouldn't everyone mark that box?
So why cant she be a black woman?
Rachel Dolezal is identifying with a race. She believes she is a black woman. what more defining do you need?
If upheld it would entitle her to the associated legal protections - something she doesn't deserve.
Never mind. I'm not going to play these silly games.
What silly game???
But the construct of race (at least in the US) does not appear to be built on genetics; least ways I have never read/heard anything supporting that. It is based instead on lineage; how many of your ancestors were of such a background and how recent. Native Americans take the same approach to tribal membership. It requires a certain amount of blood relations to pass the % threshold to be admitted as a member. Several months ago there was a big brouhaha in the OK (IRCC) Cherokee tribe where they increased the % necessary to be part of the tribe excluding many people from receiving a financial settlement or such. Genetics has little to do with it....Given that these things aren't binary, exactly how black is she? Genetically, I mean. And where's your cut off? How many 'black' genes must someone have for you to classify them as black?
Hopefully your inability to answer these questions will help you to understand what a vague social construct race actually is.
On what, then, is it based? Skin colour? Do I change race slightly after a couple of days on the beach? Or is it some nebulous judgment of appearance? Nose length? Lip thickness?But the construct of race (at least in the US) does not appear to be built on genetics
You have to admit, that does sound a bit genetic-y...requires a certain amount of blood relations to pass the % threshold to be admitted as a member.
On what, then, is it based? Skin colour? Do I change race slightly after a couple of days on the beach? Or is it some nebulous judgment of appearance? Nose length? Lip thickness?
You have to admit, that does sound a bit genetic-y...
OK. So, genetics then?As I pointed out, which you ignored, it is based on lineage; who your ancestors were. Native Americans use that same construct even today.
You can continue down that road if you like, I am taking this exit......OK. So, genetics then?
And how far back are we going? I mean, I have dark hair, but you would identify me as white. How many generations, and why that number?
Inconvenient truth, huh?You can continue down that road if you like, I am taking this exit......