- Nov 21, 2011
- 2,809
- 410
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Republican
In my opinion, it is painfully obvious that Job's wife wasn't dependent on the Lord, but I think that her message was not interpreted as well as it could have been. According to Job 2:9, His wife said to him, “Are you still maintaining your integrity? Curse God and die!”". She was obviously suffering because like Job, she too lost everything. The fact that she was angry at God reinforced my belief that what she did was a an expression of being angry while at the same time being flawed. Her actions were that of a woman who had no use for God in her pain, bitterness, and anguish.
I have read of commentators who attacked not just her words, but her character. Not much has been said about her except for that. I don't even know or it hasn't been mentioned in Job 42 what happened to her. I assume that because Job ended up with twice of what he had in the past, his wife returned to Job, repented of her sin of her lack of faith and rejection to God, and reunited with him. However, there have been theories or rather, explanations that she has died or she has left him, but it seems that is not plausible to me either.
It seems to me is that like her, many people would express such anger at God, even if they are professing believers. In Job 2:10, Job answered, "
“You are talking like a foolish woman. Shall we accept good from God, and not trouble?” In all this, Job did not sin in what he said." She did sin because of she at that time seemed to have allowed bitterness to consume her. In my opinion, she seemed to have blamed God for what has happened.
In my opinion, her faith in God was not nearly as strong. Her response was based on what she has seen and what she had experienced, which just happened in what seems to be all but immediate. I am not seeing her from rose colored glasses as in my opinion, her words were insensitive to a suffering man. She seemed cold, but was she? It sounds to me that she wasn't just some hateful, insensitive shrew. Job's wife was consumed in her anger and pain, which would be natural under the circumstances. Am I expressing that she is right on condemning God? On that note, she obviously did not see or had any use for the same God that Job did.
I have read of commentators who attacked not just her words, but her character. Not much has been said about her except for that. I don't even know or it hasn't been mentioned in Job 42 what happened to her. I assume that because Job ended up with twice of what he had in the past, his wife returned to Job, repented of her sin of her lack of faith and rejection to God, and reunited with him. However, there have been theories or rather, explanations that she has died or she has left him, but it seems that is not plausible to me either.
It seems to me is that like her, many people would express such anger at God, even if they are professing believers. In Job 2:10, Job answered, "
“You are talking like a foolish woman. Shall we accept good from God, and not trouble?” In all this, Job did not sin in what he said." She did sin because of she at that time seemed to have allowed bitterness to consume her. In my opinion, she seemed to have blamed God for what has happened.
In my opinion, her faith in God was not nearly as strong. Her response was based on what she has seen and what she had experienced, which just happened in what seems to be all but immediate. I am not seeing her from rose colored glasses as in my opinion, her words were insensitive to a suffering man. She seemed cold, but was she? It sounds to me that she wasn't just some hateful, insensitive shrew. Job's wife was consumed in her anger and pain, which would be natural under the circumstances. Am I expressing that she is right on condemning God? On that note, she obviously did not see or had any use for the same God that Job did.
Last edited: