The semi-Pelagian take on this is Prescient Election.
The Most High looks into the future and sees all us
'good people' who will "come to God" and "accept Jesus"
...then chooses them to save !
This reducing the Supreme Being to a mere ticket-taker
at the gates of heaven.
A doctrine totally alien to the Scriptures !
Correct. What you present is totally alien to Scripture. And it is NOT my view. Not even close.
Here is what I posted, which resulted in the ridiculous rant above:
The Bible clearly states that Jesus tased death for all. Not "some", not the "elect", not "just believers". But all. ...
The view that says "the Most High looks into the future and chooses those who will believe", is a view that denies the omniscience of God. Because God doesn't have to "look into the future" to know who will believe. He has always known. By having to look into the future means that God learns by doing so.
But, because God is omniscient and knows everything, He cannot learn.
So what you claim is a "semi-pelagian" view is certainly in error, and is not my view.
But the real question here is why you went on your semi-pelagian rant when my quote had nothing to do with God looking into the future. What prompted that rant?
In fact we know from the Bible that God is pleased to save those who believe.
1 Cor 1:21
For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God,
God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached
to save those who believe.
Do you really want to argue that being well pleased to save believers isn't a choice?
God's Word (Bible), instead, has Saving Faith as a "gift"
("God has allotted to each a measure of faith" Romans 12:3
NASB).
No, you are wrong. Eph 2:8 SAYS that salvation is a gift, which is affirmed in Rom 6:23
For the wages of sin is death, but
the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
If the Lord were to look into the future to see who -on their
own- will have faith, He would see ...NOBODY !
Well, good news, RS. He doesn't "look into the future". He doesn't have a crystal ball because He doesn't need one. He is omniscient.
However, your conclusion is still in error because He is omniscient and has always known who will believe.