"brutally" crucify. Huh. I wonder what other adjectives would fit there.
I don't scream for war. I understand that war has been declared. Like all rational people, I know that you cannot have peace with an enemy bent on your destruction. The jihadists do not want a brokered peace. They want the destruction of Israel and a world governed by sharia law. They want the elimination of all Christians. There is no treaty making with them. They must be defeated.
The last few decades where the military has been used, you mean?And that's worked soooooooo well for us the last few decades, hasn't it?
Remind me again how we're better than them?What will work is that we kill them all; down to the mail clerks. If you're a member of a terrorist organization you die. Period. They are unfit to live among civilized people.
You can't "defeat" a concept. All you can do is police it.I don't scream for war. I understand that war has been declared. Like all rational people, I know that you cannot have peace with an enemy bent on your destruction. The jihadists do not want a brokered peace. They want the destruction of Israel and a world governed by sharia law. They want the elimination of all Christians. There is no treaty making with them. They must be defeated.
I think that for a lot of them, that's big part of it, yes. If they don't admit their talking points ae in error, they don't have to stop using them, and they really seem to think their nonsensical ranting somehow "helps" their "side", as though truth isn't determined by, you know, reality, but rather how many internet arguments you called someone a liberal in.Why do people refuse to learn or admit mistake? Do they believe it somehow dishonors them or makes them less of a person? That's ridiculous..
It hasn't worked in four decades. Kidnapping, raping and selling 200 young girls as sex slaves didn't bring an ounce of remorse. It you want to capture them, take them to Gitmo, take away the ability to practice their evil "religion," and teach them about the Lord you might be able to save a few. Maybe. That requires putting soldiers in front of them to capture them, which puts the soldiers' lives at risk. There is no rehabilitation at Gitmo. We continue to indulge them by providing them with Korans and drawing arrows to show them where Mecca is. Not surprisingly, when we release them they return to murder more innocents.Sometimes God uses the death of a Christian to witness to others. Sometimes terrorists see that Christians refuse to renounce Christ before their deaths, and it pricks something deep down in their souls that maybe there's something to Christianity afterall.
Name three. I googled it and didn't find any.There have been cases of Muslim Radicals converting when they see the horrors that go on.
Your opinion is noted, but the lives of a thousand terrorists don't equal the life of one civilized person, be they Muslim, Jew or Christian.Those "subhuman" people are not subhuman at all,
There are no Isis civilians....including civilians...
Do you think they're going to listen to the opinion of someone they've been raised since birth to hate?how many people are going to end up in Hell that might have otherwise been saved?
GITMO and ISIS and 4 decades in the same paragraph. Cool.It hasn't worked in four decades. Kidnapping, raping and selling 200 young girls as sex slaves didn't bring an ounce of remorse. It you want to capture them, take them to Gitmo, take away the ability to practice their evil "religion," and teach them about the Lord you might be able to save a few. Maybe. That requires putting soldiers in front of them to capture them, which puts the soldiers' lives at risk. There is no rehabilitation at Gitmo. We continue to indulge them by providing them with Korans and drawing arrows to show them where Mecca is. Not surprisingly, when we release them they return to murder more innocents.
How convenient.There are no Isis civilians.
Your opinion is noted, but the lives of a thousand terrorists don't equal the life of one civilized person, be they Muslim, Jew or Christian.
Do you think they're going to listen to the opinion of someone they've been raised since birth to hate?
Of course all life has value, everyone knows that, and I think everyone would agree with it.... The real question is to quantify that value.A truly civilized person recognizes the value of all life.
It hasn't worked in four decades. Kidnapping, raping and selling 200 young girls as sex slaves didn't bring an ounce of remorse. It you want to capture them, take them to Gitmo, take away the ability to practice their evil "religion," and teach them about the Lord you might be able to save a few. Maybe. That requires putting soldiers in front of them to capture them, which puts the soldiers' lives at risk. There is no rehabilitation at Gitmo. We continue to indulge them by providing them with Korans and drawing arrows to show them where Mecca is. Not surprisingly, when we release them they return to murder more innocents.
There are Muslims who follow the peaceful writings of Mohammed when he was in Mecca and ignore the violent, sociopathic side he demonstrated in Messina. Many of them are outraged at the evils committed in the name of their religion, though most are afraid to speak up. There are also Muslims who converted to Christianity. Islam calls for their murder.
Your opinion is noted, but the lives of a thousand terrorists don't equal the life of one civilized person, be they Muslim, Jew or Christian.
Do you think they're going to listen to the opinion of someone they've been raised since birth to hate?
So your position is that we should do nothing while evil people murder God's people and force their children to convert to an evil religion. Got it.
So those who sat by and did nothing while the SS rounded up and murdered the Jews have no blood on their hands, right?
I won't address the last part because there is no debating someone who blames America for the rise of radical Islamists in a region dominated by Islam for centuries.
The argument a thread posted here is helping to feed the desire of Islamist to spread terror is so obviously and fundamentally flawed as to be silly on its face. It calls into question why you would actually make it. What agenda you were actually attempting to promote.
The argument some Muslim sitting at his or her computer somewhere who happens to come across this thread is going to read it and then become radicalized illustrates a cosmic lack of understanding and comprehension of what radical Islam actually is. And what attracts individuals to it. How anyone can even attempt to make that argument with a straight face is borderline inconceivable, except when you factor in who it is the American left at large truly hates. Which, of course, isn't radical Islam.
Their desire to spread terror stems from the Quran, and their application of its teachings.
The argument a thread posted here is helping to feed the desire of Islamist to spread terror is so obviously and fundamentally flawed as to be silly on its face. It calls into question why you would actually make it. What agenda you were actually attempting to promote.
Your initial assault was against the notion of a member here starting this thread on the grounds it would provide publicity for ISIS. The truth is ISIS is not the least bit emboldened by nor is their effectiveness enhanced in the slightest by our discussing their actions or intentions here.
Regardless, ISIS does not measure success according to how many people are talking about them. They measure success based on the body count.
"Just like"
...I don't think that means what you think it means...
Let me see if I can educate you a little bit on this....
If you are incapable of understanding what these articles say or if you lack comprehension of this, then there isn't much more I can do to help you.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...-by-killing-people-with-rocket-launchers.html
http://theweek.com/articles/539804/america-falling-right-into-isiss-trap
http://www.newsweek.com/feeding-isis-monster-321982
http://www.popsci.com/terror-on-twitter-how-isis-is-taking-war-to-social-media
http://www.newsweek.com/inside-isis-social-media-campaign-312062
Oops.. I forgot to include these quotes of yours which have just proven your total lack of understanding on this issue:
Every statement here has just been debunked by the links I posted above.
Apparently, your understanding of ISIS use of social media is horribly lacking in both comprehension and insight.
I'm a person who seeks truth and understanding.. even in the face of having to admit I am mistaken.. I am a big enough person to admit when I am wrong..
Are you?
Ugh.As if we do not know that isis is recruiting, and using fear on social media to promote their insanity.
It's unbelievable that anyone would blame social media for isis and there agenda.
Instead of blaming youtube like the example I posted on Bengazi, why don't Americans demand a better Administration who can track these people with the computer technology we have today?
Why not see a collective effort world wide to track every one of them?
Seriously who is turning a blind eye to this?
I do not hear of Russian Christians being killed wonder why?
What else would we do with them there?Are you serious? "teach them about the Lord" while they're in Gitmo?
Who said anything about torture? Rehabilitation means teaching them the error of their ways. We can't let them leave as radical jihadists. What's your alternative?You don't get people to turn to the Lord by torturing them.
Yes, that was a good observation. Islam is basically two religions.So basically, you're saying the same thing I'd been saying all along -- every Muslim picks and chooses which parts of the faith they decide to follow.
There is a time of war and a time of peace. I'm posting as an American and a member of the human race. Human beings need to be protected from predators. I love you and will share the gospel with you, but if you come to rape and kill my granddaughter I'll shoot you dead.But what are you doing? You're not following what Christ said to do at all. You call yourself a Christian, but yet I don't see Christ in what you're posting.
You burn people alive and behead the innocent?You're not worth more than me, I'm not worth more than you, and get this: we're not worth more than a terrorist.
I put the blame on those who were able to stop them and did not.Wars get started, sometimes God ordains wars. In the end, God has a plan, and while the SS murdered countless Jews, you can't possibly put the blame on people who were not able to fight them.
Again not true. We supported the Northern Alliance. He had his own group, and they were self-funded.You know that Osama bin Laden guy? He wasn't always a radical. In fact, he was once a friend of ours that we supplied weapons to.
Hussein was removed because of his SUPPORT of suicide bombers. Nice try.Maybe if there were stable (even if iron fist dictator) governments over there, then maybe these people wouldn't be able to trample all over everybody, mmm?
What else would we do with them there?
Who said anything about torture? Rehabilitation means teaching them the error of their ways. We can't let them leave as radical jihadists. What's your alternative?
There is a time of war and a time of peace. I'm posting as an American and a member of the human race. Human beings need to be protected from predators. I love you and will share the gospel with you, but if you come to rape and kill my granddaughter I'll shoot you dead.
You think we should do nothing while they crucify Christians and burn them alive. Message noted. Rejected, but noted.
You burn people alive and behead the innocent?
Stray dogs have more value than terrorists.
I put the blame on those who were able to stop them and did not.
That's not true. They're using mostly Russian AK-47's. They are using some weapons that Hillary and Barack illegally sold them, but Russia has been flooding weapons into the Middle East for decades.
Hussein was removed because of his SUPPORT of suicide bombers. Nice try.