Dismiss Notice

Welcome to Christian Forums, a friendly forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.

Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
  • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
  • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting after you have posted 20 posts and have received 5 likes.
  • Access to private conversations with other members.

We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Irresistible Grace & Luther

Discussion in 'Theologia Crucis - Lutherans' started by BBAS 64, May 19, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BBAS 64

    BBAS 64 Contributor Supporter

    Messages:
    7,080
    Likes Received:
    511
    Marital Status:
    Married
    Faith:
    Christian
    Good Day, to my Lutheran Brothers & Sisters

    Back in the old P/R/E I was trying to understand the Lutheran view of Grace being resistible as it refered to the elect of God. I do believe that Lutherans will up hold the Election of some, and not of others.





    The question I have is if grace is resistible by the elect. How are the elect brought in to an understanding of the "word of life". Given Luther's view of the will of man " bound in sin" and his inabilty to seek God as well as that man's desire to not seek God in is natural state.

    Would this be fair defintion of:
    Irresistible Grace - Indicates that because the grace of God in electing some to salvation is sovereign, it is not possible that the elect will effectively resist his grace. Nevertheless, for reasons known only to Himself, God may sometimes allow this work of grace seemingly to be delayed.


    Peace to u,

    Bill
     
  2. JVAC

    JVAC Baptized into His name

    Messages:
    2,484
    Likes Received:
    81
    Marital Status:
    Single
    Politics:
    US-Others
    Faith:
    Lutheran
    *Touches thread with a ten foot poll*


    :p ;)



    -James
     
  3. ByzantineDixie

    ByzantineDixie Handmaid of God, Mary

    Messages:
    3,638
    Likes Received:
    143
    Marital Status:
    Married
    Faith:
    Eastern-Orthodox
    Hey Bill! Welcome to our new home! :wave:

    I don't always understand the questions you pose. The problem is mine, so please forgive me when I head off in the wrong direction. I do not understand the part in the definition you list pertaining to "delay". How is "delay" indicated?

    I am going to start out by saying that I believe Calvinists in particular have difficulties with the Lutheran perspective on the doctrine of election because the Calvinist theology draws logical conclusions...conclusions that Lutherans will not make because they are not supported by Scripture.

    Scripture tells us that the elect will not fall away and that some will resist God's grace. But we can not take the leap to say that because the elect will not fall away that God's grace is irresistable because Scripture also tells us some will resist.

    The following information comes from the WELS website (fast becoming another favorite of mine). It may help explain the position a bit better.


    Does this help to begin to address your question? -----R
     
  4. Lotar

    Lotar Swift Eagle Justice

    Messages:
    8,565
    Likes Received:
    417
    Marital Status:
    Married
    Faith:
    Eastern-Orthodox
    A dispute about predestination should be avoided entirely... I forget everything about Christ and God when I come upon these thoughts and actually get to the point to imagining that God is a rogue. We must stay in the word, in which God is revealed to us and salvation is offered, if we believe Him. But in thinking about predestination, we forget God . . However, in Christ are hid all the treasures (Col. 2:3); outside him all are locked up. Therefore, we should simply refuse to argue about election.
    Such a disputation is so very displeasing to God that he has instituted Baptism, the spoken Word, and the Lord’s Supper to counteract the temptation to engage in it. In these, let us persist and constantly say, I am baptized I believe in Jesus. I care nothing about the disputation concerning predestination.
    -Martin Luther


    Unfortunately, I am not so wise. ;)


    No, we do not believe in irresistible grace.

    I like how Martin Chemnitz addresses the topic:

    Thus when they say: Because it is necessary that a man assent and recieve grace, therefore man himself does not do altogether nothing, we can rightly reply with Augustine: "It could be understood in a good sense, if it were not spoken by those whose opinion is known." For let there be added that man has this, that he wills and is able to assent, accept, and act in conversion, or in spiritual matters, not through his own natural powers, either entirely or in part, but that he recieves it from Him who works both to will and to do, then there will be no controversy. For it is certian that we will to assent, accept, act, etc., but God works to will and to do. For what do you have which you did not recieve? Augustine shows that it is Pelagian to understand this statement of natural gifts. Although they could easily have explained these ambiguities with a few words, what shall we consider the reasons to be why they preferred to play with these generalities, unless it was in order that, with these actors' stilts fitted to both feet, they might be able to bring back into the theater for unwary spectators the ancient fable of the masters of sentences.
    But what they seriously try to prove, that a man can dissent and reject grace when it is offered, is, sad to say, only too true. For we do not suppose that grace is so thrust upon the will in conversion that no matter whether he is willing or unwilling, he is compelled to have it, as when a brand is burned into the body. But this is what we say, that it is a gift and work of the Holy Spirit that grace is recieved with desire, delight, and joy. But that it is repudated, rejected, and wasted is the corruption and ill will of our flesh.

    This also is not said clearly enough, that the free will of man, moved and incited by God, cooperates by assenting when God incites and calls. For it is necessary that Augustine's distinction between operating grace and cooperating grace be clearly explained, namely, whether free will cooperates with God throught its natural powers, so that, when God works in us to will and assent, some natural power or efficacy of the old man cooperates to produce that willing or assent. Or when grace moves and incites the will, that then the assent emerges through the natural powers of the will. Augustine certainly says: "That we will God works without us," as has been explained above. But there is no doubt that once the firstfruits of spiritual gifts have been recieved, the regenerate will is a co-worker of God through the capabilities which it has recieved from the Spirit of regeneration.
    Besides, the deceitful equivocation in the word "to assist" must be observed. Augustine says clearly in De correptione et gratia, ch. 1: "If the Son has made you free, you will be free indeed. Not in such a way that when someone has been freed from the condemnation of sin, he no longer needs the help of his liberator but rather in this way, that hearing Him 'Without Me you can do nothing,' he also himself says to Him, 'Be Thou my Helper!'"
     
  5. ByzantineDixie

    ByzantineDixie Handmaid of God, Mary

    Messages:
    3,638
    Likes Received:
    143
    Marital Status:
    Married
    Faith:
    Eastern-Orthodox
    What a great Luther quote! I have saved it...you may see it again some day. An obsession with election in any other way than to draw comfort is one thing that sets me off. Unfortunately...though I may rant about it, Luther has a bit more credibility!!! ;)

    Peace
     
  6. BBAS 64

    BBAS 64 Contributor Supporter

    Messages:
    7,080
    Likes Received:
    511
    Marital Status:
    Married
    Faith:
    Christian

    Good Day, Rose

    I am sorry I am so tardy on this it has been buzy around heer. The Delay which has been accounted for the definitionis there to reply to some whom make statements such as, " I have heard the Gospel preached overe and over again and never responed to the gospel even though I knew I should have, then one day I responeded". People will some times put this forward as a instance that they resisted grace. IMO this is flawed.

    I do not have a problem with the Election as seen by Luther, I think on that point we agree. That is why I included that quote, because that is a fore gne conclusion. As to one drawing logical conclusion from Scripture I think all belevers to some extent do it Luther included, the question becomes how nessary are those conclusions and are they logical.

    Rose, A little example: Did Peter's mother-in law have a daughter?

    A little yes and no, it does have some impact on "if" and how IG relates to the perservence of the saints.

    My question is around the means God uses in making election sure, and not about election it's self. If man can resist grace from God then that means that the grace is not absoutly effective to bring God's elect unto salvation.

    So the question is by what means does God absolutely bring the elect unto salvation.

    Hope this helps,

    Bill
     
    ByzantineDixie likes this.
  7. ByzantineDixie

    ByzantineDixie Handmaid of God, Mary

    Messages:
    3,638
    Likes Received:
    143
    Marital Status:
    Married
    Faith:
    Eastern-Orthodox
    The resistance I speak of is not a delay it a complete rejection unto death.

    I don't have an answer for you. Recall the original quote from the WELS site.

    We simply accept God at His Word and we do not attempt to probe His hidden nature.

    Sorry, thats the best I can do. Maybe someone else has a better take on the subject.

    Thanks-----R
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...