shinbits said:
I keep hearing about this "gap" theory. What is it?
God-of-the-Gaps (not to be confused withthe GAP theory of Creation) is basically any attempt to shoehorn "Proof" of God's existence into any natural phenomena we cannot fully understand.
For example, thousands of years ago, people believed that Earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and most other natural disasters were caused by the wrath of someone's god, because they couldn't understand what they were and how they worked... now we know differently.
Your definition of ID more or less states that a "God" (i.e. supernatural designer who shall remain nameless with a wink and a nod to fundamentalists) is plausible
only because we have not yet (and in science, the key word is always "yet") gathered enough evidence to prove anything else.
Meanwhile, ID has gathered
no data on its own, offers
no experiments, makes
no predictions. It's a redressing of "We don't understand this... it must be God!"
The problem is that ignorance is never "proof" of anything except ignorance.
Wow.
Many times when I've said it's no logical that an entire planet and all it's ecosystems and species with complex DNA, biological functions, living patterns like ants that build complex nests and work togehter even though there are many thousands of them, that this couldn't possibly have developed randomly---
Incredulity is not the same as logic. Things are true regardless of whether or not you think they are possible.
And someone always says, "You obviously don't understand natural selection. If you did, you'd know that it isn't random."
Now you say natural selection is random? Evolutionists need to sit down and figure which one they'll stick to.
No, you need to sit down and pay attention. Natural selection is a non-random process working with random materials. Mutations are random, natural selection is not.
Natural selection isn't a fact anyway, it's just a belief.
Care to substantiate this, or is this only your own belief?