In
one of my recent threads, I pointed out the numerous significant scientific advancements that our understanding of evolution and common descent enabled - advancements that would make
no sense without, at the very least, a common ancestor between birds and humans.
So, just for laughs, let's ask the reverse question. What predictions could we make based on special creationism? What does creationism tell us about the world? How does the knowledge that all kinds of animals are unrelated, created some 6,000 years ago, help us understand reality?
If you understood that breed mates with breed and produces a new breed - you would understand the fossil record. Understand why all fossils are in a state of stasis (breed remains the same breed until mating with another breed). Why there are gaps and missing links - because no links are missing when breed mates with breed producing new breeds - and why they appear suddenly in the fossil record. The fossil record would begin to make sense in light of observations of how life propagates and we would not be required to imagine 95% Fairie Dust to make observations fit theory.
My prediction is that the Husky will always remain a Husky and never evolve into anything else, just as the triceratops remained a triceratops and never evolved into anything else, or T Rex or brontosaurus, or any of them..... I predict the appearance of new breeds in the fossil record will be sudden - just as we observe in reality today without postulating an imaginary gap game.
I predict that no matter how many times an E coli is mutated - it will always remain E coli. Creationism tells us exactly what we observe - that breed mates with breed within the Kind - producing new breeds within that Kind. It tells us that finches that interbreed from the start are not separate species - but merely breeds of the same species, that the theory of speciation is undone. It tells us what science already knows - that species become infraspecific taxa of the parent species - and that only improper classifications muddy the waters.
I would predict that after the cataclysm that destroyed the dinosaurs - the fossils should all be found piled together - exactly as observed. That all will be found as evolutionists say (just happened to be grazing by a stream when a flood came along, etc., etc.) to avoid that darkness and the deep that came about.
I would predict that chimpanzee fossils will not be found as early as man, being a breed of ape that came along later - as the fossil record shows.
I would predict that a priests theory of the beginning of creation will be stolen and twisted to suit the ends of others instead of the miracle it points to.
And what prediction of the future does evolution make? I am predicting the Husky will always be a Husky - a Mastiff a Mastiff, a red tailed deer a red tailed deer, a black bear a black bear, until one mates with another breed within the species and a new breed comes into existence. I predict evolution through mutation of one creature into another will never be observed - as it has never been observed.
I would predict that evolutionists will now make lots of claims without presenting any facts or observations of the real world to back up their claims.
