How much of Matthew 24 is fulfilled

Amount of Matt 24 fulfilled

  • I view all of it fulfilled

  • I view it as mostly/partially fulfilled

  • I view it as none of it is fulfilled

  • I don't really know

  • Other [please explain]


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
And that's it for now. I hope that wasn't TOO much for everyone to read. There are a lot more prophecies, but you should know the rest are indeed happening. If you want to see the whole list go to: People Get Ready! Documented FACTS proving Jesus is coming SOON!

Edit: Oh and uhh, I voted ALL of Matthew 24 fulfilled.
Thank you for your input.

Not sure I understand the above part. If Matthew 24 is fulfilled, isn't that the 2nd coming? :confused:

Matthew 24:3Of sitting yet of Him upon the Mount of the Olives toward-came to Him the Disciples according to own saying "be telling to us when? shall these-things be and what? the Sign of the Thy ParousiaV <3952> and the together-finish/sun-teleiaV <4930>of the Age" [Daniel 12/Revelation 15:1]

1 Corin 15:23 Each yet in the own rank, a firstfruit Christ, thereafter the ones of the Christ in the parousia <3952> of Him
24 thereafter the End/teloV <5056>,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

JudgeEden

Lone Wolf
May 27, 2008
241
54
Washington
✟15,549.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Thank you for your input.

Not sure I understand the above part. If Matthew 24 is fulfilled, isn't that the 2nd coming? :confused:

Matthew 24:3Of sitting yet of Him upon the Mount of the Olives toward-came to Him the Disciples according to own saying "be telling to us when? shall these-things be and what? the Sign of the Thy ParousiaV <3952> and the together-finish/sun-teleiaV <4930>of the Age" [Daniel 12/Revelation 15:1]

1 Corin 15:23 Each yet in the own rank, a firstfruit Christ, thereafter the ones of the Christ in the parousia <3952> of Him
24 thereafter the End/teloV <5056>,

Lol, oh yeah, your right. Minus that. And yeah, I couldn't leave the topic without leaving something.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Lol, oh yeah, your right. Minus that. And yeah, I couldn't leave the topic without leaving something.
Im glad you benefited from the post :D
Btw, if you view all of Matthew 24 as fulfilled [as I also do], how much of Daniel do you view as fulfilled? I myself view both of them as all fulfilled.
Maybe I should start a poll thread on that :idea:

Daniel 12:1 And in that time, Miyka'el shall standup, the Chief, the Great, the One-standing over sons of people of thee. [Revelation 12]
And a time of Tribulation becomes, which not occurred from to become of a Nation/01471 gowy, until the time, that.

Matt 24:21 "For then shall be Tribulation/qliyiV <2347> Great, the such as not has become from beginning of World til of the now, neither not no may be becoming
 
Upvote 0

Notrash

Senior Member
May 5, 2007
2,192
137
In my body
✟10,983.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Uh, no, they DIDN'T see all of those things.

Matthew 24 AND Revelation is PRIMARILY about the ultimate destruction of SIN, EVIL AND THE POWER OF DEATH that presently works IN and WITHIN mankind and all of those workings are OF THAT/THIS Generation, the GENERATION OF DEVILS.


I'm sorry, but on this particular matter C.S. Lewis didn't see any better than you because you are only led to look at PEOPLE, which THAT GENERATION promotes because THEY do not want to be 'seen' by us by their 'nature.' They RESIST having the LIGHT shed upon them and they DO SO in mankind because they are IN mankind.

Jesus showed all of us this FACT on nearly every page of the Gospels. Mankind is not alone in flesh or in mind my friend. And you are no exception.

enjoy!

squint
You skirted and danced around the word study at hand and added more commentary and personal interaction.

As agreed upon the generation (Gennema; fruit and offspring of like kind) of vipers continues from the time of the sowing of Israel/Judah with the seed of men and beasts from the time of the Babylonian captivity and their development of the Talmud and the disbelief in the end of the old covenant and perpetuation of the race and religion and subsequently their necessary disbelief and rejection of the Messiah. I personally believe that there has been an increase in the influence of that Gennema over the last 200 yrs through secular humanism (treating divine or natural humans as animals... I.E. the spirit of the beast) and socialism, but I don't view it as an 'end time' increase, just a progression of the seeds continuation.

In addition, their is a sense that all 'unregenerate' men/persons are of the natural human race and thus bear both the image and likeness of the Creator, but the also the 'seed' of mankind. Christ and John the baptist both said that Christ came not to condemn the world, but to save, for the world was already under condemnation... John 3:18; 36... .though still bearing the testimony of the Creator.(Romans 1)

However, you miss the point of the discussion. You are using Genea in Matt 23 and 24 as if it were Gennema. which would be the word that would be used to mean "a continuation of a like kind of person...fruit, offspring or in this case a "generation' of religious and satanlcally inspired men. The Olivet and Matt 23 uses the word Genea which means a group of persons living during a common lifespan. Since Christ added the word "This" to the people who he was speaking to, it can only really mean that generation of men who were living at that time period. This is supported by the reality that those people in that generation were being instructed about the destruction of the temple and the timing to escape Judea and to flee to the mountains east of the Jordan River.

It was at that time that the 'way which seems right unto men" of conditional compelled performance unto a "law" was also judged inferior in favor of the unconditional righteousness via faith in the Person and goodness of the Creator. (Dan 7)

I think that in Duet 32 the Hebrew word DOWR for generation can also have a meaning of those living in an age or lifetime, http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?strongs=H1755 rather than the word towl&#277;dah, but it's not as clear as in the greek Genea/Gennema. In the Hebrew, the word "seed" zera seems to have a similar meaning that "gennema" or Genos has in the NT.

We cannot impose generic ENGLISH transliterations (in this case 'generation') on more specific Greek words. Just as in Spanish there is a difference between Saber and Conocer which both mean "to know" in English but have different Spanish meanings and applications, so also their is a difference in Genea and Genemma in Greek, both of which can be translated "generation" in English but which have different specific applications in Greek. You are using the wrong application for the word "Genea" that Christ used in the discourse and the message.

If you wish to continue discussion, please address the difference between Genea and Genemma and the use of Genea in the Olivet foretelling of the remaining disciples escape from Judea during that lifespan rather than the use of Genemma.

Your disagreement that all those things occurred in the first century is the topic of this thread.

As in the "this generation" thread in the Escatology section, your invited to consider Adam Clarke's itemization of how/when all those things occurred. Or if there are things which you feel were not fulfilled, feel free to name them. This goes beyond a simple poll, but as part of the discussion, LLOJ may permit it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JediMobius
Upvote 0

JudgeEden

Lone Wolf
May 27, 2008
241
54
Washington
✟15,549.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Btw, if you view all of Matthew 24 as fulfilled [as I also do], how much of Daniel do you view as fulfilled? I myself view both of them as all fulfilled.
Maybe I should start a poll thread on that :idea:

Daniel 12:1 And in that time, Miyka'el shall standup, the Chief, the Great, the One-standing over sons of people of thee. [Revelation 12]
And a time of Tribulation becomes, which not occurred from to become of a Nation/01471 gowy, until the time, that.

Matt 24:21 "For then shall be Tribulation/qliyiV <2347> Great, the such as not has become from beginning of World til of the now, neither not no may be becoming

I also believe Daniel has been fulfilled as well.
 
Upvote 0

thecountrydoc

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2006
2,745
58
84
San Marcos, CA
✟48,164.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Hello LittleLamb, and all who have posted to, or read, this thread.

Before I make any direct comment on whether Matt. 24 is past, present, or future, may I present something that might be of help in understanding Matt. 24, as well as several other important prophecies. I have posted this in other forums in the past and I think we need to consider this topic here. This goes to the heart of the question as posed in the OP of this thread.

&#65279;What Are Dual Prophecies?

The Word of God is simple to understand, but it is also extremely broad and comprehensive. God can be in more than one dimension, yet
we always try to stuff Him into a little box. When God delivers a prophecy through a prophet or an angel, we naturally try to make it address just one narrow point. But God’s Word is so dynamic and alive that one prophecy prophecy can have more than one application, as long as they don’t conflict.

That’s why some prophecies have what is called a dual application. For instance, in 1 Chronicles 17, Nathan gives a prophecy to King David. “And it shall be, when your days are fulfilled, when you must go to be with your fathers [when you die] that I will set up your seed after you, who will be of your sons; and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build Me a house, and I will establish his throne for ever” (NJKV). This comes about because David wants to build a temple, a physical house of worship, to honor God.

We know that David’s son Solomon did in fact build a temple after his father died, so this prophecy was fulfilled. But is there more to it? Absolutely! Jesus is called “the son of David,” and He also said, “Destroy this temple made with hands and in three days I will make one without hands.”” A temple is also a church, and Christ built up His church after His resurrection. So the “seed” whose throne will be established forever is more completely fulfilled in Jesus.

This is one utterance of prophecy that is fulfilled in more than one way, yet they don’t conflict. In most cases, these can be broken down into a physical or historical and a spiritual fulfillment. We find another example in Matthew 24. Referring to the destruction of Jerusalem, Jesus says, “There will not be left one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.” The disciples, confused and troubled, had a threefold question for Jesus: “When will these things [the destruction of Jerusalem] be? What will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the world?”

Jesus doesn't answer these as separate questions; rather, He gives them a combined answer. He mingles the whole answer into one discourse. Why? Because a lot of the same things that happened in advance of the destruction of Jerusalem are also going to happen just prior to the end of the world.

The spiritual state among God’s people during Christ’s first coming, His organized church, could be very similar to the spiritual condition of His organized church before His second coming. There are many parallels. Some prophecies, though not all, have more than one fulfillment. Some saying that we need to watch out for false prophets because there will also be genuine prophets. Otherwise, Jesus would have simply warned us to beware of any prophet.

Prophecy Warns the Lost

When Moses went before Pharaoh, God sent a series of frightening plagues to encourage the devilish ruler to act. However, these plagues were not meant to destroy; rather, they were sent to first save the Jews from captivity, but also to help the Egyptians avoid utter destruction.

“And the LORD spake unto Moses, Go unto Pharaoh, and say unto him, Thus saith the LORD, Let my people go, that they may serve me. And if thou refuse to let them go, behold, I will smite all thy borders with frogs” (Exodus 8:1, 2).

Why was it necessary for Moses to warn Pharaoh in advance that a plague of frogs was coming? If Moses had not said anything and a plague of frogs suddenly came swarming out of the great river, Pharaoh’s counselors could have said, “This is just a natural occurrence.” If Moses had gone after the plagues and said, “See all these frogs? That’s because you won’t let my people go!” Well, anybody can do that.

A lot of people have weighed in on 9/11, Katrina, and the Indonesian tsunami after the fact. How much more compelling would their testimony be to others had they spoken prior to the events? People would have really sat up to take notice. Moses gave these prophetic warnings to save the lost and to warn the rebellious, showing that God is really in control.

Prophecy Strengthens Faith

The metal image in Daniel 2 is an incredible prophecy. It outlines the kingdoms of the world in perfect order——Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome, the divided Roman Empire, and ultimately the Lord’s coming. To date, it has happened exactly as God said it would.

It is simply not possible for a person, in their own power, to predict which nations of the world are going to rule over others, especially hundreds of years from now. We might suggest that Daniel wasn't’t pressed too hard when he mentioned Medo-Persia as the next global empire. Everyone could see it was a rising power in those times. But Greece was just a country of warring tribes, and the Romans were nothing more than a virtual village. It must have been a ridiculous notion to even Daniel, who was faithful enough to report it nonetheless. And yet it came true, even down to the important details, such as each one lasting successively longer than the one before and the divisions of the Roman Empire.

How does that make you feel about God and His Word? It strengthens your faith. It certainly gives me courage! It suggests that other Bible prophecies can be trusted, and that God’s Word does not fail. Jesus said, “Now I tell you before it come, that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe that I am he” (John 13:19).

In short, Jesus gives prophecies so that you will believe in Him. We have something to cling to so that our faith will remain strong even as
tribulation comes.

Prophecy’s Ultimate Purpose

Revelation can be such a perplexing book. I’ve known a few dear souls who don’t even like to glance over it because it intimidates them. But while most people know Revelation as a powerful yet cryptic book penned by John on the island of Patmos, they skip right over the most telling part of the book——the first verse.

It reads, “The Revelation of Jesus Christ.” That’s enough, really, to get to the ultimate purpose of prophecy. Whether you’re reading prophecies found in Revelation, Daniel, Ezekiel, or Genesis, never forget that Jesus is the focus. He’s the ultimate point. Just read Isaiah 53 to see what I mean, and if you still don’t believe me, trust what Jesus did: “And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself” (Luke 24:27).

In John 5:39, He says, “Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.” Jesus is in
the warp and woof of every fiber of Scripture; all true prophecy ultimately points to points to Christ. He is the fulfillment of the Word. More than 300 Old Testament prophecies deal with Christ’’s first coming alone.

Given time, a Bible, and a person who is honest and logical, I’ve always believed that I can convince a searching soul that the Bible is true based on the fulfillment of its prophecy. In fact, I have a friend who used to be that person——an atheist who thought the Bible was nothing but a sad joke on deluded people. But we know that the prophecies in the Old Testament were written long before Christ appeared on the scene, and they came true. The timing of His birth, the place, the mother, and all the details of His ministry——His betrayal, His death, and His burial——were spelled out in amazing detail long before Jesus was born. Now, my friend is no longer an atheist!

And if the Bible is right about the when, the where, the how, and the why, then we can also trust that it is right about the who. Jesus is the Savior, the only way to the Father.

The Principal Principle

The ultimate message of prophecy is redemptive. The reason that God tells you the future is not so you will know when to take your money out of the bank or so you can know when you’’re supposed to run for the hills and stock up on food.

He tells you all this more than just to let you know when Christ will come the first time or the second time——or what happens during the millennium. He tells you so you will know He is God and to help you allow Him to come into your heart. And that’s true whether you are familiar with the many secrets of Revelation or whether you are just beginning to read the Bible. The joy and peace you feel when you know that God has a plan for you is one of the most faith-building
experiences you can have.

Yes, He has numbered every star in the universe and knows what’s going to happen in the ceaseless ages to come. Yet despite this infinite knowledge of God, He has a hope and a plan just for you.

God is in charge, and He’s proven it with prophecy. He can be trusted, because His Word has never and will never fail. “Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away” (Luke 21:33). You can bank your life on Him and His Word, especially as you go out to tell others of His wondrous power.

Without Limits

Not only does God know the future, He can take you back to the past. Not all Bible prophets see just the future. For instance, in the book of Revelation, not only is John taken into the future and shown visions, he also witnesses the battle between Michael and the dragon at the beginning of their great cosmic conflict. God can see all eternity——past, present, and future——with perfect clarity.
______________________________________

I pray that this will be of help as we study these extremely important books of prophecy.

Respectyfully, your brother in Christ,
Doc
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Pretty good post Doc. I subscribe to the multiple application theory of prophecy as well. There may be in many cases a physical showing and a spiritual showing then or even later.

The physical showings are usually indicitive of the dynamic and classic battles between spiritual force of Good/Perfection pitted against anti-spiritual powers of darkness/evil.

I also believe that both Matt. 24 and Rev. is entirely about the unseen battle, but of course it may also spill out into physicality in some ways related.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You skirted and danced around the word study at hand and added more commentary and personal interaction.

Just trying to bring that unseen 'generation' into view, which your position has always seemed largely VOID of. It's very problematic to view spiritual matters strictly through the physical lens, and the 'generation' is certainly one of those topics.
As agreed upon the generation (Gennema; fruit and offspring of like kind) of vipers continues from the time of the sowing of Israel/Judah with the seed of men and beasts from the time of the Babylonian captivity and their development of the Talmud and the disbelief in the end of the old covenant and perpetuation of the race and religion and subsequently their necessary disbelief and rejection of the Messiah.

The association of that 'generation' with 'VIPERS' is beyond denial. So why try to take the REAL VIPER who was in the Garden out of the picture with the view above?

It's much simpler to observe THE REAL VIPER and 'his work, his family and his generation' which does stretch from nearly the beginning of the text to near the end of same. We may see many physical POP UPS of that working (at least I do) but I have to keep in mind that what we are really viewing in physicality will not show me the 'real' viper as that working is not one that is PHYSICAL except via 'end results.'

There is a dark anti-spiritual/anti-Christ machine in operations behind the scenes of 'physicality.' This is part of the reason I detest views that focus on external physical depictions i.e. the Pope as the anti-Christ or the RCC as the (whatever) and any related FLESHLY observances of these matters when that working is much more prevalent but BEHIND THE PHYSICAL CURTAIN than merely focusing on a single individual, group or overt external working.

It's far more interesting than just that.

I personally believe that there has been an increase in the influence of that Gennema over the last 200 yrs through secular humanism (treating divine or natural humans as animals... I.E. the spirit of the beast) and socialism, but I don't view it as an 'end time' increase, just a progression of the seeds continuation.

I don't think any of us as believers can deny the OPENLY SPREADING amount of various works of the anti-Christ VIPERS into our physical world. That is blatantly obvious to any believer and progressively so. If my grandparents were alive today they would be internally STUNNED as to how much evil and decadence is openly worshipped in todays world. Yes, we are experiencing a rapid acceleration on many fronts. The classic exponential curve at nearly every juncture ALONG WITH a general 'dumbing down' of our spiritual senses of these matters.

In addition, their is a sense that all 'unregenerate' men/persons are of the natural human race and thus bear both the image and likeness of the Creator, but the also the 'seed' of mankind. Christ and John the baptist both said that Christ came not to condemn the world, but to save, for the world was already under condemnation... John 3:18; 36... .though still bearing the testimony of the Creator.(Romans 1)

Well, at that point I will depart from the commoners view of these matters. I have the understanding that it is GOD who elects which vessel to raise in every lump of mankind. He's still in charge. He could turn every vessel of HONOR to RISE IN THE LUMP in the twinkling of HIS EYE should HE elect to do so. I do not blame MANKIND for this working and do think that God is in GOOD CHARGE, no, make that PERFECT CHARGE of all the events of His creation. Blaming the creation will in my mind seem rather stupid in the light of Gods Power.

However, you miss the point of the discussion. You are using Genea in Matt 23 and 24 as if it were Gennema. which would be the word that would be used to mean "a continuation of a like kind of person...fruit, offspring or in this case a "generation' of religious and satanlcally inspired men.

And you seem to be missing the point as well. There is only ONE generation of devils...though they are EXPANDING i.e. depicted by the phrase 'children' of the devil. The CHIEF DEVIL is still here and his 'entire family' is in fact only of ONE generation who has not yet passed away. I could apply that same example to the cases of 'evil' generation (have not all generationS of mankind been immersed in that EVIL generation?) When you see KINGDOM rising against KINGDOM why was there not a PLURAL usage? The KINGDOM in view here will again be THE KINGDOM OF GOD rising against the KINGDOM of EVIL/SATAN and vice versa. Nation against nation...same deal.

We are simply not talking PHYSICAL NATIONS here.

The Olivet and Matt 23 uses the word Genea which means a group of persons living during a common lifespan.

So says YOU. You do understand however that you have ZERO account for that 'generation' that you CANNOT SEE. That nation, that kingdom, that GENERATION of VIPERS. Your understanding of text is nearly and completely VOID of that which you cannot set before your eyes and lay hands on, yet THAT WORLD and it's INHABITANTS were OPENLY REVEALED by Christ and shown to be WITH and WITHIN mankind. You, in short do not ACCOUNT for open facts of that world and it's inhabitants and in fact ONLY LOOK AT PHYSICAL MEN when there is obviously a WHOLE LOT MORE going on that can't be seen with that EVIL GENERATION.

Here is a simple example.

We know that God in Christ openly forgave those who 'pierced' Him PHYSICALLY on the cross.

But that was not all that was going on IN THOSE MEN and Jesus knew it. By the time we get to REVELATION those men have obviously long since turned into DUST BODIES...but LOOK who is going to SEE HIM when Jesus returns:

Revelation 1:7
Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.

Those DEVILS who PIERCED HIM were in those men on that day Christ was PHYSICALLY KILLED and they are still standing here UNSEEN to this day and will STILL be standing here on the DAY of WRATH when Jesus comes to DIVIDE THEM AWAY from mankind and INTO the infamous LAKE OF FIRE...prepared for THEM, the devil and his messengers.

If you can't see in this way, it is also because of that same working in the flesh of men that WON'T ALLOW THAT SIGHT...and there is nothing I can do about it. To me it's an OPEN VIEWABLE FACT...yet some just don't 'get it.' And I don't blame them for NOT getting it. I know that working is effective to BLOCK THE SIGHT of them 'in men.'

Since Christ added the word "This" to the people who he was speaking to, it can only really mean that generation of men who were living at that time period.

And again that is simply YOUR IMPOSED VIEW which is completely VOID of the other parties. Your view of text does not take into account the UNSEEN EVIL that is with all mankind. It's that simple. I admit to THAT EVIL being with me, no different that it was WITH PAUL in Romans 7:21. Evil is present with me. Evil is present with you. But WE as Gods children are NOT THAT EVIL PRESENT with us.

This is supported by the reality that those people in that generation were being instructed about the destruction of the temple and the timing to escape Judea and to flee to the mountains east of the Jordan River.

IF you think Matthew 24's great tribulation came and went with the people of Israel in 70 AD you would be greatly mistaken. That great tribulation is for the DESTRUCTION OF ALL SIN, EVIL AND DEATH on that GREAT DAY OF WRATH...and that is going to come upon THAT singular generation of DEVILS without any doubt.

You look at a PHYSICAL ROOFTOP in PHYSICAL JUDEA. I have a much more complex understanding of the term 'Judea' in the spiritual sense. I won't bother getting into it other than to say your understanding of these matters in general revolves almost entirely around what you can see and touch but you will NEVER touch SPIRITUAL or ANTI-Christ matters in the physical sense and THAT really is what the document of text is MORE about.
It was at that time that the 'way which seems right unto men" of conditional compelled performance unto a "law" was also judged inferior in favor of the unconditional righteousness via faith in the Person and goodness of the Creator. (Dan 7)

And here again, because I see from Jesus Own Lips what happens when and where the WORD is sown and FACTOR THAT into my understandings I have dramatically DIFFERENT views of what goes on in these matters than just what I can see with my flesh eyes. The entirety of the LAW of the flesh was written against the working of LAWLESSNESS in the flesh, which same is OF THE DEVIL whom NONE of us can lay FLESH EYES on. That does not mean I need to be VOID OF VISION on these matters. God has shown me things in HIS WORDS that are not meant for flesh views nor will flesh VIEWERS ever understand them because God has not meant things to be understood that way. All viewers of the flesh will continue to argue about fleshly things when the simplicity of the entire Bible is entirely about SPIRITUAL PERFECTION doing battle with the ANTI-Christ spirits which battle transpires PRIMARILY in mankinds heart where it cannot be VIEWED.

I think that in Duet 32 the Hebrew word DOWR for generation can also have a meaning of those living in an age or lifetime,Blue Letter Bible - Lexicon rather than the word towl&#277;dah, but it's not as clear as in the greek Genea/Gennema. In the Hebrew, the word "seed" zera seems to have a similar meaning that "gennema" or Genos has in the NT.

The 'wicked' or 'evil' age has extended from the time God spoke HIS BLESSINGS upon Adam with Eve yet within him unto the END of that 'wicked' 'evil' generation/seed of DEVILS. This is the only understanding that makes sense to me. Believe me, I've tried nearly every other angle imaginable.

We cannot impose generic ENGLISH transliterations (in this case 'generation') on more specific Greek words. Just as in Spanish there is a difference between Saber and Conocer which both mean "to know" in English but have different Spanish meanings and applications, so also their is a difference in Genea and Genemma in Greek, both of which can be translated "generation" in English but which have different specific applications in Greek. You are using the wrong application for the word "Genea" that Christ used in the discourse and the message.

Your spin on the Greek is not going to change this matter. It can CERTAINLY apply to a SINGULAR generation

Usage in the KJV:
generation 37, time 2, age 2, nation 1

If you wish to continue discussion, please address the difference between Genea and Genemma and the use of Genea in the Olivet foretelling of the remaining disciples escape from Judea during that lifespan rather than the use of Genemma.

There is no use discussing this topic in a ONE VIEW manner when you have exactly ZERO account of things you cannot SEE but those same things ARE written of throughout the text. You only want to look at MAN as a physical being and you DEVOID them of their EVIL cohorts. That to me is the vision of a BLINDED person as it relates to TEXT. Text is far more interesting when the OTHER PARTIES to these matters are brought to the table of discussions BECAUSE they ARE a reality written of therein on nearly EVERY page of the book one way or another.
Your disagreement that all those things occurred in the first century is the topic of this thread.

I consider myself a partial preterist...as Matt. 24 is obvious a progression over the time span of MANKINDS GENERATIONS but also a time span SINGULAR of the EVIL generation. In fact I find it quite shortsighted to think that that GENERATION of the people of Israel was the EVIL WICKED generation when the wicked and evil have so openly and obviously been in perpetual continuation SINCE THEN and prior. It's just idiotic to think THEY were THAT generation.

All of mankind and the world have been immersed INTO a WICKED/EVIL generation.

As in the "this generation" thread in the Escatology section, your invited to consider Adam Clarke's itemization of how/when all those things occurred. Or if there are things which you feel were not fulfilled, feel free to name them. This goes beyond a simple poll, but as part of the discussion, LLOJ may permit it.

I have no interests in opinions of men who do not and CANNOT see the obvious when it's jumping up on every page. I doubt very much Adam Clarke (whom I've probably read some long time past) has ANY account whatsoever for the VIPERS in ISRAEL or if he does he will like most, just BLAME MEN only in spite of the OBVIOUS and OPEN working of DEVILS in all these matters.

Overall the VOIDED VIEW of those parties is why MOST people aren't able to come to grips or agreements on any of these matters of prophecy, because they JUST look at the EXTERNAL values of them. They are in fact more INTERNAL matters that will continue to escape the views of those who try to capture them externally.

It is OF THE WICKED GENERATION that seeks AN EXTERNAL sign just so ya know. That may be working in you as well. I don't hold it against you as Gods child which I know you are.

enjoy!

squint
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Notrash

Senior Member
May 5, 2007
2,192
137
In my body
✟10,983.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Just trying to bring that unseen 'generation' into view, which your position has always seemed largely VOID of. It's very problematic to view spiritual matters strictly through the physical lens, and the 'generation' is certainly one of those topics.

So says YOU. You do understand however that you have ZERO account for that 'generation' that you CANNOT SEE. That nation, that kingdom, that GENERATION of VIPERS. Your understanding of text is nearly and completely VOID of that which you cannot set before your eyes and lay hands on, yet THAT WORLD and it's INHABITANTS were OPENLY REVEALED by Christ and shown to be WITH and WITHIN mankind. You, in short do not ACCOUNT for open facts of that world and it's inhabitants and in fact ONLY LOOK AT PHYSICAL MEN when there is obviously a WHOLE LOT MORE going on that can't be seen with that EVIL GENERATION.
squint

There is a reason to have 'zero' account for the unseen Gennema (generation) in the Matt 23, 24 account. It is because it is not there. Again, the word that Christ uses is not the english word "generation" but the greek word "Genea" which limits the occurances of "all these things" including the manner of the great tribulation to occur within that lifespan (or generation) of those people to whom he was talking with. I'll call it the intercovenantal generation, just to put a name on the 40 yr period.

Again you have not addressed the choice of words between Genea and Genemma as used in this text or in each of its uses in the NT.

I do deny that there remains a spiritual generation of 'devils' or spirits who Genea after Genea instructs people to seek a kingdom by works, by knowledge, by religious oppression and falsehood....and that kingdom is opposit of the personal individual already established in power Kingdom of Chirst.

But it is also true that even today's citizenry of the world, as powerful and overtly imposed as it may seem to be; can be rejected (in accordance with provisions of their own laws and lawfully) and resisted so that satan will flee.... No one can say "Jesus is Lord" except by the Holy Spirit" Saying "Jesus is Lord" was oppossite of what was commanded in the Roman empire when people were instructed to say Ceasar is Lord... which would be secular humansim... i.e... the beast.

And I do not deny that their are spiritual principles, patterns and laws that were established during the intercovenantal generation which have powerful extended application towards us; BUT again, that is not what Christ is telling those disciples who were standing there in that GENEA.

Again, it is asked that you consider the differences between the words Genea and Gennema and not only consider the word 'generation'. It is those words which either Christ spoke or which the disciples translated to Greek which we must deal with.

Again as stated above, you are using the application of the word Gennema where Genea (people living in a common lifespan) is used in Matt 24.

Again this is the very point of the topic of this discussion. COULD all those things, including the establishment of the personal individual kingdom of God in power (the kingdom of God is within you) have occured in that GENEA (in the next 40 yrs) just as Christ said that it would.???
"Full preterists" say yes...and are content in that understanding. You, Futurists, Partial preterist or Historicists (such as Judge Eden) would say 'no'.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Notrash

Senior Member
May 5, 2007
2,192
137
In my body
✟10,983.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It has been said that 80&#37; of the worlds total knowledge has been brought forth in the last decade alone, and 90% of all Scientists that ever lived are alive TODAY! The Almighty is no dime store psychic folks, when He says something is about to happen... IT WILL!


Edit: Oh and uhh, I voted ALL of Matthew 24 fulfilled.
The clipped portion of your thread would be known as the 'historict' position, but with a twist in that it's not the 7th day Adventist. Your saying all Daniel and the Olivet are fulfilled (except the 2nd coming) progressively through History while a full preterist wouild say that all of Matt 24 was fulfilled and the spiritual laws that those event enacted were empowered during during the next 40 yrs after the crucifiction/resurrection. A full preterist would say that Daniel was prophecying about the next 490-530 yrs AND the ending of the old covenant AGE (aeon, not world.. kosmos) that was prophesied in Duet 32. Thus all Daniel would have been fulfilled also by the end of the first century and even by 75 AD.

I think your percentages are intended to be sensational and to follow the position stated. Science is a discipline that builds one layer upon another. The 80/90 percentage in the last DECADE??? A rather silly statement imo.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Originally Posted by LittleLambofJesus

Btw, if you view all of Matthew 24 as fulfilled [as I also do], how much of Daniel do you view as fulfilled? I myself view both of them as all fulfilled.
Maybe I should start a poll thread on that :idea:
I also believe Daniel has been fulfilled as well.
:) :thumbsup: Thou art closer to "Full Preterism" than thou thinkest ;)
 
Upvote 0

thecountrydoc

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2006
2,745
58
84
San Marcos, CA
✟48,164.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Hello once again to all,

When we read Matt. 24:1-3 the answer is clearly given as to whether this chapter concerns things both past and future.

In verse #1 Christ and the discipiles had just left the temple and it's beauty. The discipiles were very proud of the temple and, shall we say, giving Jesus "a guided tour" of the suroundings.

In verse #2 Jesus is responding to the disciple's pride in the temple by telling them of it's vulnerability and it's destruction yet to come when He said; "See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down."

This was a foretelling of the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. This statement caused the discipiles great concern. They in turn ask this question in verse #3; "Tell us, when shall these things be?" and they then added a two part second request, "and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and the end of the world?"

History clearly tells us that the temple was destroyed in 70 AD. It is also quite evident that Christ hasn't returned yet to this earth yet nor has this world come to an end yet. Considering this one exchange alone, between Christ and the disciples, provides us with all the information we need to to see that some of the prophecy in this chapter has already been fulfilled and some of the prophecy is yet to be fulfilled.

And from my post #68:
We know that David’s son Solomon did in fact build a temple after his father died, so this prophecy was fulfilled. But is there more to it? Absolutely! Jesus is called “the son of David,” and He also said, “Destroy this temple made with hands and in three days I will make one without hands.” A temple is also a church, and Christ built up His church after His resurrection. So the “seed” whose throne will be established forever is more completely fulfilled in Jesus.

This is one utterance of prophecy that is fulfilled in more than one way, yet they don’t conflict. In most cases, these can be broken down into a physical or historical and a spiritual fulfillment. We find another example in Matthew 24. Referring to the destruction of Jerusalem, Jesus says, “There will not be left one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.” The disciples, confused and troubled, had a threefold question for Jesus: “When will these things [the destruction of Jerusalem] be? What will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the world?”

Jesus doesn't answer these as separate questions; rather, He gives them a combined answer. He mingles the whole answer into one discourse. Why? Because a lot of the same things that happened in advance of the destruction of Jerusalem are also going to happen just prior to the end of the world.
The foregoing is but one example of a dual prophecy. There are many, many, more.

May God put His loving arms around you, the Holy Angels protect you, and the Holy Spirit guide you as we study God's word.

Respectfully, your brother in Christ,
Doc
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Notrash

Senior Member
May 5, 2007
2,192
137
In my body
✟10,983.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Hello once again to all,

When we read Matt. 24:1-3 the answer is clearly given as to whether this chapter concerns things both past and future.

In verse #1 Christ and the discipiles had just left the temple and it's beauty. The discipiles were very proud of the temple and, shall we say, giving Jesus "a guided tour" of the suroundings.

In verse #2 Jesus is responding to the disciple's pride in the temple by telling them of it's vulnerability and it's destruction yet to come when He said; "See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down."

This was a foretelling of the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. This statement caused the discipiles great concern. They in turn ask this question in verse #3; "Tell us, when shall these things be?" and they then added a two part second request, "and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and the end of the world?"

History clearly tells us that the temple was destroyed in 70 AD. It is also quite evident that Christ hasn't returned yet to this earth yet nor has this world come to an end yet. Considering this one exchange alone, between Christ and the disciples, provides us with all the information we need to to see that some of the prophecy in this chapter has already been fulfilled and some of the prophecy is yet to be fulfilled.

And from my post #68:The foregoing is but one example of a dual prophecy. There are many, many, more.

May God put His loving arms around you, the Holy Angels protect you, and the Holy Spirit guide you as we study God's word.

Respectfully, your brother in Christ,
Doc
Hello Country Doc,
Thanks for your input...

I read 24:3, not as 3 questions, but as one with a layered information request as was a common writing technique..

When will these things be (the throwing down of the temple) and the signs of your coming (to destroy the temple and end oppression of judaism; my thoughts) and end the old covenant, its ways and age of our present geo-political-religious world?


The word for "world" is aeon not kosmos or aionios.(eternity) The aeon (singular age) that the disciples were living in was the geo-political heavens/earth of the old land/nation conditional covenant of judea/national Israel.
The disciples, being believers (though some still in the transformation of their mind process.. i.e. Peter) would have understood from Daniels prophecies and Moses' prophecies in Duet 29-32 that the old conditional land/nation covenant was inferior shadow covenant and designed to have an end along with their national pre-eminence. They would have known and understood that they were living in the time extension of the 490 yrs after Babylon that was to usher in the Messiah and close the old covenant age.

Here is what Richard C. Trench says about the difference between AEON and KOSMOS. Read carefully as the importance of his observations.

&#922;&#8057;&#963;&#956;&#959;&#962; (Kosmos) our Translators have rendered &#8216;world&#8217; in every instance but one (1 Pet. 3:3); &#945;&#7984;&#8061;&#957; (aeon)often, though by no means invariably so; for (not to speak of &#949;&#7984;&#962; &#945;&#7984;&#8182;&#957;&#945;) see Ephes. 2:2, 7; Col. 1:26. It may be a question whether we might not have made more use of &#8216;age&#8217; in our Version: we have employed it but rarely,&#8212;only, indeed, in the two places which I have cited last. &#8216;Age&#8217; may sound to us inadequate now; but it is quite possible that, so used, it would little by little have expanded and adapted itself to the larger meaning of the Greek word for which it stood. One must regret that, by this or some other like device, our Translators did not mark the difference between &#954;&#8057;&#963;&#956;&#959;&#962; (== mundus), the world contemplated under aspects of space, and &#945;&#7984;&#8061;&#957; (== seculum), the same contemplated under aspects of time; for the Latin, no less than the Greek, has two words, where we have, or have acted as though we had, but one. In all those passages (such as Matt. 13:39; 1 Cor. 10:11) which speak of the end or consummation of the &#945;&#7984;&#8061;&#957; (there are none which speak of the end of the &#954;&#8057;&#963;&#956;&#959;&#962;), as in others which speak of &#8220;the wisdom of this world&#8221; (1 Cor. 2:6), &#8220;the god of this world&#8221; (2 Cor. 4:4), &#8220;the children of this world&#8221; (Luke 16:8), it must be admitted that we are losers by the course which we have adopted.
When will these things be (the throwing down of the temple) and the signs of your coming (to destroy the temple), the end of the old covenant geo-political religious age?

3 parts of the same question all answered in the following text and applying to contemporary people of that GENEA.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There is a reason to have 'zero' account for the unseen Gennema (generation) in the Matt 23, 24 account. It is because it is not there.

It was you who imposed falsely that the generation of vipers could not POSSIBLY be the 'generation' spoken of in Matt. 24. I am not trying to equate the terms, only the POSSIBILITY that the 'generation of VIPERS' is linked to Matt. 24 and many other singular generation texts and related texts. The singular term study of 'generation' throughout the text will yield up much information in the direction I've written of.
Again, the word that Christ uses is not the english word "generation" but the greek word "Genea" which limits the occurances of "all these things" including the manner of the great tribulation to occur within that lifespan (or generation) of those people to whom he was talking with. I'll call it the intercovenantal generation, just to put a name on the 40 yr period.

And you are certainly welcome to your seemingly full preterist position. IF it wasn't potentially there no one would observe it so. Most reject full preterism on the basis that the world hasn't ended and Jesus hasn't 'fully' returned and the wicked are also obviously still here and not yet sent to the infamous Lake etc etc. You know the full preterist counters well enuf I'm sure.
Again you have not addressed the choice of words between Genea and Genemma as used in this text or in each of its uses in the NT.

No, you've selected to focus on a very minor point of possible linkage stating that it's NOT POSSIBLE when it certainly IS at a very minimum at least a potential/possible link and ignore the balance of the observations.

I do deny that there remains a spiritual generation of 'devils' or spirits who Genea after Genea instructs people to seek a kingdom by works, by knowledge, by religious oppression and falsehood....and that kingdom is opposit of the personal individual already established in power Kingdom of Chirst.

So, either you deny that devils still exist or you have a miss above? And that view would be perhaps somewhat heretical within general orthodoxy.

But it is also true that even today's citizenry of the world, as powerful and overtly imposed as it may seem to be; can be rejected (in accordance with provisions of their own laws and lawfully) and resisted so that satan will flee.... No one can say "Jesus is Lord" except by the Holy Spirit" Saying "Jesus is Lord" was oppossite of what was commanded in the Roman empire when people were instructed to say Ceasar is Lord... which would be secular humansim... i.e... the beast.

Jesus advised quite clearly that where the Word is sown, SATAN arrives in the hearts of mankind to steal same. Paul affirmed that view in many various ways. There is zero reason to believe that working has been halted.

And I do not deny that their are spiritual principles, patterns and laws that were established during the intercovenantal generation which have powerful extended application towards us; BUT again, that is not what Christ is telling those disciples who were standing there in that GENEA.

There is a veritable mountain of evidence in the Gospels that Jesus did speak to DEVILS and SATAN in mankind and dealt with them in various ways throughout the Gospels during His ministration. All sin was directly linked to THE DEVIL in 1 John 3:8.

Again, it is asked that you consider the differences between the words Genea and Gennema and not only consider the word 'generation'. It is those words which either Christ spoke or which the disciples translated to Greek which we must deal with.

And again the question is not so much as 'the greek' translation but unto WHOM was He speaking. IF the term can only be applied to mankind as you say, WHY would it NOT be potentially applicable to DEVILS IF those entities were 'with' or 'within' mankind, i.e. 'those standing there'...and particularly so within those closest to where THE WORD (hearing The Word of Jesus) was sown as that is also an obvious entry point for those entities.
Again as stated above, you are using the application of the word Gennema where Genea (people living in a common lifespan) is used in Matt 24.

And it could very well be that Jesus was addressing 'children of the devil' in those people i.e. the DEVILS fruit/genos. These are all closely related terms, but to say that they can ONLY apply to mankind would be shortsighted of the obvious other parties as prior noted.

Again this is the very point of the topic of this discussion. COULD all those things, including the establishment of the personal individual kingdom of God in power (the kingdom of God is within you) have occured in that GENEA (in the next 40 yrs) just as Christ said that it would.???

Only if you consider that the 'end of the world/age' on a mass scale. There WILL be an end to the wicked/evil age on a mass scale. All of creation WILL ENTER the freedom of the Sons of God ala Romans 8. I don't see that has happened as of yet. But hey, that's the fun of observing the text. We all have different reflections on many of these matters.

"Full preterists" say yes...and are content in that understanding. You, Futurists, Partial preterist or Historicists (such as Judge Eden) would say 'no'.

I can't truthfully DENY that Jesus has returned, perhaps so in MANY BILLIONS of times in various ways within individuals. I also believe His Full Return is AN INNER RETURN wherein the usurpers (DEVILS/EVIL PRESENT) is utterly driven from OUT of mankind (my own view.) He does after all theoretically abide within us, but sin is also still there and that sin remains linked to the DEVIL quite securely in many ways in the text. But equating this present 'token' occupancy with the end of the age doesn't fit for me as it appears that wickedness is actually growing exponentially along with a multitude of other 'issues' related to wickedness/evil.

enjoy!

squint
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
*snip* quote Squint:
...........Only if you consider that the 'end of the world/age' on a mass scale. There WILL be an end to the wicked/evil age on a mass scale.

All of creation WILL ENTER the freedom of the Sons of God ala Romans 8. I don't see that has happened as of yet. But hey, that's the fun of observing the text. We all have different reflections on many of these matters.
So where in Revelation does it show the End of the Age Jesus is talking about to the Jews? :wave:

Matthew 24:3 He is yet sitting on the mount of the Olives, the disciples toward-came to Him according to own, saying "tell us, when? shall these be and what? the Sign of the Thy ParousiaV and of the together-finish/sun-teleiaV <4930> of the Age/aiwnoV <165>"

Matthew 28:20 "Teaching them to be keeping all as much as I direct to ye.
And behold!, I with ye am all the days, till the together-finish/sun-teleiaV <4930> of the Age/aiwnoV <165>. Amen"

Christian Forums - View Poll Results
Question time. Jesus returns before or after 1000yrs
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hello once again to all,
In verse #2 Jesus is responding to the disciple's pride in the temple by telling them of it's vulnerability and it's destruction yet to come when He said; "See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down."


A statement from Jesus such as the 'blue' above does bring in a very certain potentially broader flavor eh? Certainly that term could have included MUCH MUCH more than what the disciples physically saw i.e. the temple and surroundings. Jesus obviously had a much different and further ranging 'sight.'

This was a foretelling of the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. This statement caused the discipiles great concern. They in turn ask this question in verse #3; "Tell us, when shall these things be?" and they then added a two part second request, "and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and the end of the world?"

History clearly tells us that the temple was destroyed in 70 AD. It is also quite evident that Christ hasn't returned yet to this earth yet nor has this world come to an end yet. Considering this one exchange alone, between Christ and the disciples, provides us with all the information we need to to see that some of the prophecy in this chapter has already been fulfilled and some of the prophecy is yet to be fulfilled.

And from my post #68:The foregoing is but one example of a dual prophecy. There are many, many, more.


The 'temple destruction' reference gets vastly more interesting when we read scriptures such as the following (dontcha think?)

1 Corinthians 6:19
What? know ye not that your body is the temple

1 Corinthians 3:17
If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

We know for example that the 'real' temple(s) remain CURRENTLY defiled fleshly speaking because of the presence of indwelling sin and 'evil' present. To say Jesus was NOT addressing this particular angle of the TEMPLE VIEW and ONLY ADDRESSING the physical temple in Jerusalem is TOO TIGHT of a temple view imho. There remains A MASSIVE TEMPLE CLEANSING, internally speaking. Jesus even gave us a PHYSICAL SIGN of this impending cleansing when He 'physically' drove out the 'merchants' therein...there WILL COME a similar CLEARING OUT spiritually speaking.

It is spoken of RIGHT HERE:
1 John 3:8
He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.

s
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
The 'temple destruction' reference gets vastly more interesting when we read scriptures such as the following (dontcha think?)
Let us keep this on Matthew 24 and the Olivet Discourse for now.

Does anyone here view that event of the Olivet Discourse as the same event showing in Revelation [as I myself do]?

Luke 21:5 And certain saying about the Temple that to stones ideal and devoted-things it hath been adorned He said.......

Reve 19:3 And a second-time they have declared "allelouia and the Smoke of Her is ascending into the Ages of the Ages".
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.