davedjy
Well-Known Member
- Dec 11, 2006
- 2,184
- 1,080
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
My proof is that one study does not sustain substantial evidence in all scenarios. Your claim is that it is NOT genetic, which means YOU have the burden to prove that in all cases, and all situations it isn't genetic.The 2 PhDs who conducted the study contradict you. Where did you get you PhD and when did you review their study and findings??
The heavier burden is on YOU to prove that it isn't genetic at ALL...
Upvote
0