drich0150
Regular Member
- Mar 16, 2008
- 6,407
- 437
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
The bible tells us that Righteousness only comes through living a perfect life. We can not obtain righteousness because we are slaves to sin. Therefore God has provided atonement through a blood sacrifice of Christ. That allows for choice/sin so that our hearts maybe free to choose what we really want with God..I feel like we're just getting into semantics here. But I view it as God not demanding us to be morally perfect as in, I do not have to live a morally perfect life because God has this whole atonement/forgiveness thing worked out.
Again He does. IF you believe the bible.God does not demand that we live a perfect life.
IndeedI will not live a perfect life.
Again no. Forgiveness is not so you can sin more.God doesn't expect me too because its impossible, hence forgiveness.
Forgiveness/atonement allows you to decide whether to be with God or away from God, apart from sin.
Then you must disregard the same verses that speak about forgiveness. Because to forgive means the one to be forgiven has fallen short of the standard he is to live by.Its just semantics because of our definitions of "demand" and the way we view the causation but I don't think its important.
What you have failed to identify is the reason why.. The act of sinning and forgiveness is conditional. you have not identified the condition.Yes, I re-read your post and I understand this. From what I gather you mean to say that "walking in the Spirit" does not equate to "living a sinless life". Rather, "walking in the Spirit" is equated with "having whatever sins you do commit be forgiven." Am I correct in your understanding?
http://www.christianforums.com/t7623201/I have yet to see a perfect human, Christian or non-Christian, where I define "perfection" as being morally upright in every thought or deed.
I can understand your statement if you mean that man can be "perfected" via the Spirit in some sort of abstract, ontological sense but I disagree with you that man can be "perfected" in a practical or functional sense.
Let me elaborate a little. If I stub my toe and yell happen to take God's name in vain in my frustration and pain then that means I have sinned, correct? If all sin is equal, then my sin is equal to that of a mass murderer who slaughters several innocent people.
You said earlier that a Christian cannot adequately be labeled a Christian if their "action (like any other habitual/malice sinner) is not consistent with their proclamation of Christianity.
This would be true with any liar, gossip or any other 'minor sinner.'"
So, what I get from this is that, according to you, since me taking God's name in vain is an action that is not consistent with my proclamation of Christianity (or Jesus' moral value system), I therefore cannot adequately be labeled a Christian based on this on "minor" sin and do not "know" Christ fully.
post #8
Screwing up has nothing to do with Christianity. it is not what you do that defines your status as a Christian it is why you are doing it.I hold to the fact that by this strange definition, no one is a Christian because everyone screws up.
Only if you insist to hold fast to the idea that "your understandings and definitions" are indeed the standards and definitions found in the bible.And from this there seems to be an inherent inconsistency in that most Christians quickly label the mass murderer as not a "real" Christian but, taking it to its logical conclusion as your definition does, it becomes absurd.
But understand you nor the "spirituality" you use to judge the whole of Christianity is the standard you believe it to be.
Last edited:
Upvote
0