D
DerelictJunction
Guest
Good thing too, since that's not a claim of evolution.There is no proof that any of these started as one and over time changed into the other.
Having children is not a requirement for a fossil to be classified as a transitional.You have a bunch of different skulls of different beings. Of which you cannot prove if it even had children and if it did, how long they survived.
Your classification of 99% of all biologists and geologists as storytellers and liars, or stupid, doesn't carry much weight when we consider your lack of knowledge of what the theory of evolution entails.This is all speculation, extrapolation, assumption and faith. You believe it because someone told you that it was true, and someone told them.
The display of the skulls is not the entirety of evidence garnered from the discovery, unearthing and study of the skulls and the locations from which they came. That you don't seem to know this, is evidence enough that your opinion on the matter cannot be trusted to come close to reality.Nobody has any evidence or proof that these evolved from one to the other.
This is proof of only one thing... each of the owners of these skulls lived once.... that's it.
Upvote
0