- Nov 21, 2008
- 51,352
- 10,607
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
QFT.
When evangelists turn to fear, they lose me every time.
Fear is only helpful for those who do not want to go to hell.
Upvote
0
QFT.
When evangelists turn to fear, they lose me every time.
Anyone who obeys the first and greatest commandment does not seek to obey through fear of hell if they don't. And it would be impossible, if you obey the first and greatest commandment to view the removal of the penalty for sin as a licence to happily sin as much as you want.
The will of the father is you love him and his son.
Jesus commands can be summed up as:
Love God and love your neighbour.
If you love Jesus you will obey out of love for him and his father.
Oh the awful/ dark religion of those who don't obey as proof of their love for Christ, but rather fear of hell if they don't.
They have missed the true message, and the heart of the gospel is not in their life.
A religion driven by fear of hell, is not driven by love of Christ and his father
Thank you for sharing that --But with God all things are possible. A person can attain Sinless Perfectionism with God according to 1 Peter 4:1, Galatians 5:24, etc. In other words, I do not have to build an Ark in order to know that it was true and it happened and or for me to preach about the story of Noah and the Ark or to say to a person that is possible to build an Ark (with God's help). Also, Sinless Perfectionism is the end goal for many believer's lives. I am not going to preach that they will commit sin as they progress because not every believer's walk is the same with God. Plus, the goal is to overcome sin and not to sin. For example: An alcoholic may stumble in their road to recovery and I may even know that they may do so, but that does not mean I am going to preach they are going to slip back into being a drunk again. I believe some can overcome their sin right away with God if they have a strong enough faith in God. But in my discussion with Eternal Security Proponents, I have discovered that they are not really interested in truly living holy. In their view, they want to justify a sin and still be saved doctrine whereby a believer will never overcome sin in this life (When the Bible clearly tells us that we can overcome sin in this life).
...
In another thread some discussion going on (trying to go on) about what the gospel IS
and isn't.
Please share your thoughts on what IS the Gospel.
Was Paul in error in gal3:19-22Was Christ "in error" in Matt 10:28???
Was Paul "in error" in Romans 11:17-21??
Was Paul again "in error" in 1 Cor 9:24-27??
Do you try and obey each and every literal command of Christ?If you have perfect Love - you will have perfect obedience - and then the message of Christ in Matt 6 and in Matt 18 regarding the warning of "forgiveness revoked" will not be needed.
There seems to be a belief among some that the condition you are not under the law is if you obey the law.
That doesn't sound right to me.
But now a righteousness APART( APART) from law has been made known........Paul is talking to those who are trying to be circumcised in order to be saved (Which is going back to the Law of Moses). Paul is not talking about all laws or commands from God. Do a keyword search at blueletterbible.org and look at the appearances of the variation of the word "circumcision" and you will see that Paul is referencing the New Covenant heresy of "Circumcision Salvation."
We are not justified by the Old Law anymore.
For if you believe you are not under any kind of Law or Command, then you cannot be under the following Law or Command that says this,
"And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment" (1 John 3:23).
...
But now a righteousness APART( APART) from law has been made known........
Rom3:21
Go to the bottom of the class Jason- again!
Bring me a scripture where Paul states you have righteousness apart from some of the law but not all of it.Yes, rigtheousness apart from the Law of Moses; However, this is not talking about all law.
For under the New Covenant there is the Law of Christ (Galatians 6:2), the Law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus (Romans 8:2), the Royal Law (James 2:8), the Law of Liberty (James 1:25).
Jesus says, if you love me, keep my Commandments (John 14:15).
It would be silly of God's Word to say this and then immediately turn around and say that this is not true.
...
Thank you for sharing that --
Bring me a scripture where Paul states you have righteousness apart from some of the law but not all of it.
If you can, I will continue the discussion with you, if you cannot, there I nothing to discuss
As you have no scripture to support your claim there I nothing to discuss.You are confused because you do not realize (or you do not want to realize) that the Old Covenant Law has been fulfilled and that we are now under a New Covenant with New Laws or Commands.
I would recommend checking out the many articles (that include verses) on the subject at Grace Community International.
https://www.gci.org/law/lawmoses
...
As you have no scripture to support your claim there I nothing to discuss.
The reason you want to disagree I because you dont understand the new covenant
And do try and keep up with what is being stated.The Scripture is in the many articles. For me to post every article with Scripture would not be appropriate. If you are truly interested in the truth in hearing what others have to say with God's Word, then you will check out the articles. If not, then believe whatever you want to believe.
...
And do try and keep up with what is being stated.
I have not said law does not exist but a law of righteousness does not exist.
I know that confuses you, but I have scripture to support my belief, whereas you have none to support yours
And do try and keep up with what is being stated.
I have not said law does not exist but a law of righteousness does not exist.
I know that confuses you, but I have scripture to support my belief, whereas you have none to support yours