General Cartwright is paying the price for Hillary Clinton’s sins

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ban hammer coming down hard on General Cartwright.

From Washington Post :

General Cartwright is paying the price for Hillary Clinton’s sins

https://www.washingtonpost.com/pwa/...s-paying-the-price-for-hillary-clintons-sins/


The Obama administration Justice Department has investigated three senior officials for mishandling classified information over the past two years but only one faces a felony conviction, possible jail time and a humiliation that will ruin his career: former Joint Chiefs of Staff vice chairman General James E. Cartwright. The FBI’s handling of the case stands in stark contrast to its treatment of Hillary Clinton and retired General David Petraeus — and it reeks of political considerations.

MORE AT LINK ABOVE
 

VanillaSunflowers

Black Lives Don't Matter More Than Any Other Life
Jul 26, 2016
3,741
1,733
DE
✟18,570.00
Faith
Nazarene
Marital Status
Married
Ban hammer coming down hard on General Cartwright.

From Washington Post :

General Cartwright is paying the price for Hillary Clinton’s sins

https://www.washingtonpost.com/pwa/...s-paying-the-price-for-hillary-clintons-sins/


The Obama administration Justice Department has investigated three senior officials for mishandling classified information over the past two years but only one faces a felony conviction, possible jail time and a humiliation that will ruin his career: former Joint Chiefs of Staff vice chairman General James E. Cartwright. The FBI’s handling of the case stands in stark contrast to its treatment of Hillary Clinton and retired General David Petraeus — and it reeks of political considerations.

MORE AT LINK ABOVE
He's the one that Trump referred to at last nights debate?

Isn't it telling? The one to face jail isn't Hillary.

She knows she is untouchable by prosecution. That's why she has no respect for the laws.
 
Upvote 0

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟82,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
She knows she is untouchable by prosecution. That's why she has no respect for the laws.
And that's why I have no respect for her supporters.
Anyone who openly supports a criminal is an accessory.
Why are they aiding a criminal? Because she promises to take things from the wealthy and pass give them to the less wealthy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brinny
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Because she promises to take things from the wealthy and pass give them to the less wealthy.

Frankly if our Fed.gov could actually levy taxes from the rich to provide for the unable poor, I would be 100% behind it. It would be a Robin Hood approach. Fine with that. However, that's not how it works. From working poor to the super rich taxes are levied by the fed.gov and then to expand and bloat government. They then let some of the drippings eventually get to social programs....AFTER they expand the federal workforce, open new offices in existing agencies, spend millions if not billions on useless studies etc.

On top of that they hire expensive tax lawyers to figure out how to create loopholes so, in actuality, the rich don't pay much or not at all (write offs). This means we poor slobs in the middle class get to shoulder the load.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2012
25,255
24,152
Baltimore
✟556,744.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
And that's why I have no respect for her supporters.
Anyone who openly supports a criminal is an accessory.
Why are they aiding a criminal? Because she promises to take things from the wealthy and pass give them to the less wealthy.

Wanna go through a list of the crimes that Trump has committed either personally or through his businesses? Are you ready to wear that big scarlet 'A' (for accessory)?
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,256
20,262
US
✟1,450,964.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The proper comparison of charges and penalties is with Petraeus, not Clinton. Cartwright and Petraeus' positions and crimes are legally identical.

Clinton's actions and position are legally different--it's not even clear that her actions were legally criminal.

Petraeus was allowed to cut a deal that is still amazing to me, but obviously it was because he was a "fair haired boy" at the time.
 
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
248,794
114,490
✟1,343,246.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Ban hammer coming down hard on General Cartwright.

From Washington Post :

General Cartwright is paying the price for Hillary Clinton’s sins

https://www.washingtonpost.com/pwa/...s-paying-the-price-for-hillary-clintons-sins/


The Obama administration Justice Department has investigated three senior officials for mishandling classified information over the past two years but only one faces a felony conviction, possible jail time and a humiliation that will ruin his career: former Joint Chiefs of Staff vice chairman General James E. Cartwright. The FBI’s handling of the case stands in stark contrast to its treatment of Hillary Clinton and retired General David Petraeus — and it reeks of political considerations.

MORE AT LINK ABOVE

God have mercy!

This is sooooo wrong.

Praying.
 
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
248,794
114,490
✟1,343,246.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
He's the one that Trump referred to at last nights debate?

Isn't it telling? The one to face jail isn't Hillary.

She knows she is untouchable by prosecution. That's why she has no respect for the laws.

God help us!
 
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
248,794
114,490
✟1,343,246.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
And that's why I have no respect for her supporters.
Anyone who openly supports a criminal is an accessory.
Why are they aiding a criminal? Because she promises to take things from the wealthy and pass give them to the less wealthy.

God help us!
 
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
248,794
114,490
✟1,343,246.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Frankly if our Fed.gov could actually levy taxes from the rich to provide for the unable poor, I would be 100% behind it. It would be a Robin Hood approach. Fine with that. However, that's not how it works. From working poor to the super rich taxes are levied by the fed.gov and then to expand and bloat government. They then let some of the drippings eventually get to social programs....AFTER they expand the federal workforce, open new offices in existing agencies, spend millions if not billions on useless studies etc.

On top of that they hire expensive tax lawyers to figure out how to create loopholes so, in actuality, the rich don't pay much or not at all (write offs). This means we poor slobs in the middle class get to shoulder the load.

It's sickening.

:sick:

God help us.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟82,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Wanna go through a list of the crimes that Trump has committed either personally or through his businesses? Are you ready to wear that big scarlet 'A' (for accessory)?
Sure, put it out here. He'd love to sue you for libel.
 
Upvote 0

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟82,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Clinton's actions and position are legally different--it's not even clear that her actions were legally criminal.
Tell that to the FBI. Even Comey had to admit that she violated the law.
When was perjury decriminalized?
When was suppression of evidence decriminalized?
When was the destruction of evidence under subpoena decriminalized?
When was illegal possession of classified documents decriminalized?
When was instructing subordinates to delete classified markings decriminalized?


Here are just a few of the statutes Hillary clearly violated, according to Comey’s own statement:

18 USC §793. This statute explicitly states that whoever, “entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document…through gross negligence permits the same to removed from its proper place of custody…or having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody….shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Comey called her “extremely careless.” That was highly charitable. But even by that standard, Hillary was grossly negligent with classified material. Comey says Hillary had no intent to transmit information to foreign powers. But that’s not what the statute requires.

18 USC §1924. This statute states that any employee of the United States who “knowingly removes [classified] documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.” Hillary set up a private server explicitly to do this.

18 USC §798. This statute states that anyone who “uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States…any classified information…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Hillary transmitted classified information in a manner that harmed the United States; Comey says she may have been hacked.

18 USC §2071. This statute says that anyone who has custody of classified material and “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years.” Clearly, Hillary meant to remove classified materials from government control. source

Yes, Hillary broke the law. Because people like you give her a pass she will not be prosecuted. Apparently, you believe that the rule of law does not apply to powerful Democrats, and millions more do as well.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2012
25,255
24,152
Baltimore
✟556,744.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Sure, put it out here. He'd love to sue you for libel.

Well, from this list, we have:
Housing discrimination
Trump U fraud (also bribing the FL AG, which isn't mentioned in this piece)
Tenant intimidation
Hiring illegal workers and then refusing to pay them
Breaking multiple gaming and employment laws (including discriminating against black employees to cater to a high-rolling mafioso)
Disclosure violations related to antitrust laws
Multiple cases of theft of services in refusing to pay vendors
Self-dealing in regards to campaign funds
Self-dealing in regards to the Trump Foundation
Violation of the Cuba embargo

Here we have one of Trump's casino being fined for repeated violations of anti-money-laundering laws.

Here's your sign:

RedA.gif
 
Upvote 0

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟82,877.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well, from this list, we have:
Housing discrimination
Civil case.
Trump U fraud (also bribing the FL AG, which isn't mentioned in this piece)
Civil case.
Tenant intimidation
Unproven civil matter.
Hiring illegal workers and then refusing to pay them
Unproven civil matter.
Why were they in America in the first place? Where was law enforcement?

Breaking multiple gaming and employment laws (including discriminating against black employees to cater to a high-rolling mafioso)
Unproven civil matter.
Disclosure violations related to antitrust laws
Misdemeanor. Pay the fine. Next.
Multiple cases of theft of services in refusing to pay vendors
Unfounded allegations. If you have a problem with the bankruptcy laws, take it up with the lawmakers.
Self-dealing in regards to campaign funds
Nope. He bought books and gave them out as gifts. Business expense.
Self-dealing in regards to the Trump Foundation
Unproven allegations. No government agency has called for investigations.
Violation of the Cuba embargo
it wasn't a problem 19 years ago and isn't one now. Trump didn't go to Cuba. He re-imbursed people who went there.
Here we have one of Trump's casino being fined for repeated violations of anti-money-laundering laws.
Sounds like the casino needs a new manager.
None of these accusations would get Trump into legal problems. The fact is, Trump could not testify under oath and lie his head off. It's not illegal any more. If the law doesn't apply to the Clintons it doesn't apply to anyone.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Site Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,128
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,276.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,256
20,262
US
✟1,450,964.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Tell that to the FBI. Even Comey had to admit that she violated the law.
When was perjury decriminalized?
When was suppression of evidence decriminalized?
When was the destruction of evidence under subpoena decriminalized?
When was illegal possession of classified documents decriminalized?
When was instructing subordinates to delete classified markings decriminalized?

Here are just a few of the statutes Hillary clearly violated, according to Comey’s own statement:

18 USC §793. This statute explicitly states that whoever, “entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document…through gross negligence permits the same to removed from its proper place of custody…or having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody….shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Comey called her “extremely careless.” That was highly charitable. But even by that standard, Hillary was grossly negligent with classified material. Comey says Hillary had no intent to transmit information to foreign powers. But that’s not what the statute requires.

The Supreme Court ruled decades ago that the statute does require "intent to transmit information to foreign powers."

The handling of classified information is dictated by department secretaries. It is wholly under their purview to dictate what is lawful handling and unlawful handling within their departments. If someone in their departments break their rules, then those US codes come into play. The department secretaries are the persons who determine what is lawful or unlawful in their own departments.
 
Upvote 0

VanillaSunflowers

Black Lives Don't Matter More Than Any Other Life
Jul 26, 2016
3,741
1,733
DE
✟18,570.00
Faith
Nazarene
Marital Status
Married
The proper comparison of charges and penalties is with Petraeus, not Clinton. Cartwright and Petraeus' positions and crimes are legally identical.

Clinton's actions and position are legally different--it's not even clear that her actions were legally criminal.

Petraeus was allowed to cut a deal that is still amazing to me, but obviously it was because he was a "fair haired boy" at the time.

Destroying emails that are under subpoena is legal?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

VanillaSunflowers

Black Lives Don't Matter More Than Any Other Life
Jul 26, 2016
3,741
1,733
DE
✟18,570.00
Faith
Nazarene
Marital Status
Married
Tell that to the FBI. Even Comey had to admit that she violated the law.
When was perjury decriminalized?
When was suppression of evidence decriminalized?
When was the destruction of evidence under subpoena decriminalized?
When was illegal possession of classified documents decriminalized?
When was instructing subordinates to delete classified markings decriminalized?

Here are just a few of the statutes Hillary clearly violated, according to Comey’s own statement:

18 USC §793. This statute explicitly states that whoever, “entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document…through gross negligence permits the same to removed from its proper place of custody…or having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody….shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Comey called her “extremely careless.” That was highly charitable. But even by that standard, Hillary was grossly negligent with classified material. Comey says Hillary had no intent to transmit information to foreign powers. But that’s not what the statute requires.

18 USC §1924. This statute states that any employee of the United States who “knowingly removes [classified] documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.” Hillary set up a private server explicitly to do this.

18 USC §798. This statute states that anyone who “uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States…any classified information…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” Hillary transmitted classified information in a manner that harmed the United States; Comey says she may have been hacked.

18 USC §2071. This statute says that anyone who has custody of classified material and “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years.” Clearly, Hillary meant to remove classified materials from government control. source

Yes, Hillary broke the law. Because people like you give her a pass she will not be prosecuted. Apparently, you believe that the rule of law does not apply to powerful Democrats, and millions more do as well.
And yet, Bill walked onto Loretta Lynch's plane before a battery of reporters in broad daylight. Unethical to say the last being his wife was being investigated by the FBI. And the AG's office would prosecute.
And after he had walked off that plane Loretta announced her department would not be interested in any evidence concerning Hillary. Nor would they ever prosecute.

That's the timing that you just can't miss as being due to Bill's visit. You know, where she said they talked about family? Well yes, of course! Hillary is Bill's family.

And while Hillary supporters will claim she did nothing wrong as SoS, having an illegal non-encrypted private server, meaning no government record of goings on on that server, that was a violation. Which is to say, illegal.

And if there was no wrongdoing on her part on that server, she would have turned over 33,000 emails. After all, what's the harm? She claimed those subpoenaed emails only contained talks about her daughters pending wedding and a yoga class, if you believe that I have beach front property for sale on Venus.
Why destroy that? The wedding is over. Is the dress her daughter picked out a secret? Can't read that? How about bleaching that illegal server? That's consciousness of guilty.

The rules pertaining to the SoS office were spelled out to Hillary in the contract she signed before taking the office. She wasn't naive, or reckless. She was criminal.
 
Upvote 0