Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Flood Arguments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AV1611VET" data-source="post: 44000538" data-attributes="member: 152669"><p>EnCrypto, aside from not knowing me very well, if at all, let me say this.</p><p></p><p>I interpret the King James Bible literally. And a literal interpretation of anything - be it the Bible, the newspaper, or the phonebook - means that there is only <u>one</u> way to interpret it - the right way. That's the nature of a literal interpretation - it can be independently verified by:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">a friendly second party</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">a hostile second party</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">a neutral second party</li> </ol><p>For instance, when I say there was a worldwide flood in Noah's day, what I really mean is: the Bible says there was a worldwide flood in Noah's day. Then, by applying our motto: <em>The Bible says it - that settles it.</em> --- it doesn't take a Rhodes scholar to figure out the only conclusion I can come to, is that there was a worldwide flood in Noah's day.</p><p></p><p>See what I'm saying?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AV1611VET, post: 44000538, member: 152669"] EnCrypto, aside from not knowing me very well, if at all, let me say this. I interpret the King James Bible literally. And a literal interpretation of anything - be it the Bible, the newspaper, or the phonebook - means that there is only [U]one[/U] way to interpret it - the right way. That's the nature of a literal interpretation - it can be independently verified by: [LIST=1] [*]a friendly second party [*]a hostile second party [*]a neutral second party[/LIST]For instance, when I say there was a worldwide flood in Noah's day, what I really mean is: the Bible says there was a worldwide flood in Noah's day. Then, by applying our motto: [I]The Bible says it - that settles it.[/I] --- it doesn't take a Rhodes scholar to figure out the only conclusion I can come to, is that there was a worldwide flood in Noah's day. See what I'm saying? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Flood Arguments
Top
Bottom