I don't believe there is any rule against stating that I don't follow Paul and will not answer questions that only make sense if you aspire to Pauline theology. I didn't write anything attempting to disprove Paul's position, besides making one post responding to someone who was wondering why some people believe that Paul was pro Torah and why others believe that he was anti Torah, and I explained how he fits both profiles and that that was probably his reason for making such statements about catching people with guile. I admittedly hadn't at that point read the post with the rules pertaining to the prohibition of posting anything that refutes Paul, but despite that I didn't refute Paul out of respect for the fact that this, being a Christian forum, most members probably do accept him, but I just made it clear that I don't and helped answer a question relating to Paul's position. I am sorry if you believe this to be an infraction of the rules, I don't believe that it is, but I am happy to be corrected if so.