Endogenous Retroviruses: Evidence for Human Evolution

[bhsmte]

At this point, you guys are doing nothing more than pulling the string on the doll.

Correct.

My first and only time using ignore.

 

[CabVet]

Correct.

My first and only time using ignore.

Not my only, a few people in the ethics forums are driving me crazy too. So they are there as well.

 

[Split Rock]

At this point, you guys are doing nothing more than pulling the string on the doll.

Note to forum: If you ignore a troll, he/she will leave and troll elsewhere.

 

[justlookinla]

Just checking in to see if anyone has found any evidence that the incomprehensible complexity and variety of life was produced by only random, mindless, meaningless, purposeless and directionless naturalistic mechanism acting on a single life form of long long ago.

As I expected, no evidence so far.

 

[MerlinJ]

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

Just checking in to see if anyone has found any evidence that the incomprehensible complexity and variety of life was produced by only random, mindless, meaningless, purposeless and directionless naturalistic mechanism acting on a single life form of long long ago.

As I expected, no evidence so far.

The above rejection of what science says was written by a human with a vestigial tail hidden inside the lower parts of his backside, clear evidence of having descended from a previous species that actually sported a tail.

 

[justlookinla]

The above rejection of what science says was written by a human with a vestigial tail hidden inside the lower parts of his backside, clear evidence of having descended from a previous species that actually sported a tail.

Start at the beginning. Take the (alleged) single life form of long long ago and give the evidence that humanity is a product of ONLY naturalistic mechanisms acting on that, and numerous (billions) of subsequent life forms.

We both know no such evidence exists. Only the Godless faith-based religion of evolutionism would propose such a thing.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

Start at the beginning. Take the (alleged) single life form of long long ago and give the evidence that humanity is a product of ONLY naturalistic mechanisms acting on that, and numerous (billions) of subsequent life forms.

We both know no such evidence exists. Only the Godless faith-based religion of evolutionism would propose such a thing.

The above irrational demand was put forth by a human with ear wiggling muscles. Even though humans do not wiggle their ears, having evolved to hold their ears still to better allow phase analysis of incoming sounds. Those muscles are clearly vestigial remnants from a previous species that did actually move its ears to enhance reception of sound.

 

[Andy 998]

As I expected, no evidence so far.

You're right so what do we do when we don't have evidence? that's right we use magic.

 

[justlookinla]

The above rejection of what science says was written by a human with a vestigial tail hidden inside the lower parts of his backside, clear evidence of having descended from a previous species that actually sported a tail.

An alleged vestigial tail hidden inside the lower parts of one's backside is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

Try again.

 

[justlookinla]

You're right so what do we do when we don't have evidence? that's right we use magic.

What magic? "andy".

 

[DerelictJunction]

What magic? "andy".

"Let there be light"....and...*poof*...there is light.

or

"Abara-cadabara"...and...*poof*...rabbit from the hat.

What's the difference besides different words and a different thing appears?

 

[Dizredux]

An alleged vestigial tail hidden inside the lower parts of one's backside is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

Try again.

And the sun being hot is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

2+2=4 is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

That Washington crossed the Delaware is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

That I had sausage yesterday for lunch is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

That today is Wednesday is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

That water is wet is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.


Just, can't you even try to make sense any more?



Dizredux

 

[justlookinla]

"Let there be light"....and...*poof*...there is light.

or

"Abara-cadabara"...and...*poof*...rabbit from the hat.

What's the difference besides different words and a different thing appears?

That wasn't magic, that was power.

 

[justlookinla]

And the sun being hot is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

2+2=4 is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

That Washington crossed the Delaware is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

That I had sausage yesterday for lunch is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

That today is Wednesday is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

That water is wet is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged)
single life form of long long ago.


Just, can't you even try to make sense any more?



Dizredux

How is pointing out a hidden tail deep in someone's posterior slightly addressing the issue that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from a single life form of long long ago?

 

[Dizredux]

How is pointing out a hidden tail deep in someone's posterior slightly addressing the issue that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from a single life form of long long ago?

Like I said, can't you even try to make sense any more?


Dizredux

 

[DerelictJunction]

That wasn't magic, that was power.

The power to do magic?

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

An alleged vestigial tail hidden inside the lower parts of one's backside is not evidence that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from an (alleged) single life form of long long ago.

Try again.

Your vestigial tail is not alledged, you actually have it.

 

[Loudmouth]

bump. There are newer posters who are asking for evidence that supports common ancestry. I would ask that they start with the posts on the first few pages and ask any questions that they may have.

 

[AnotherAtheist]

How is pointing out a hidden tail deep in someone's posterior slightly addressing the issue that only naturalistic mechanisms produced humanity from a single life form of long long ago?

You've been given strong objective evidence of evolution, e.g. vestigal features, ubiquitous genes etc. Your strategy is just to ignore them and carry on making claims.

The point of science is that we create hypotheses that best explain the evidence. Can you come up with a better hypothesis to explain why we have vestigal features such as tails and ear wiggling muscles other than because we inherited them from ancestors that did have these features. Oh, and don't forget ubiquitous genes as well. And all the other strong evidence for evolution that you just dismiss out of hand with no explanation.