Sorry I missed this earlier.
What I mean is that since that lensing study in 2006 that supposedly contained 'proof' of "missing mass", at least six piece of information have come out to "explain" what was missed in the standard model. All of it was in favor of ordinary plasma, and none of it was in favor of exotic forms of matter.
In 2008 we discovered that the universe is twice as bright as we imagined, meaning they underestimated either the mass and/or the number of the brightest stars in various galaxies. We know for a fact they underestimated the stellar infrastructure.
The following year we discovered that the mainstream mass estimation models for galaxies and the number of average sized stars like our own sun that we cannot directly observe in distant galaxies were seriously flawed.
They were off by a whopping factor of 4! Again we *grossly* underestimated the mass of the stellar infrastructure. There were now two known flaws in the mainstream mass estimation models. Again, all of it was related to *stellar infrastructure*.
In 2010 we found out that the smallest and most common type of star, the
dwarf stars were also miscounted by *at least* a factor of 5, maybe up to a factor of 20! Three straight demonstrations that the mainstream *grossly* underestimated the stellar infrastructure.
In 2012, we *finally* found the "missing bayronic matter" which the mainstream knew was out there, but couldn't locate until 2012. It wasn't found in ordinary 'dust' however, it was found in
million degree plasma! We haven't even *talked* about the mass of the dust and non ionized particles that must also exist between stars. That dust still remains unaccounted for in any mass estimates.
We know from telescope "tests" that the mainstream mass estimation techniques related to normal baryonic matter were *seriously* flawed, along with these comments from NASA:
Dark Energy, Dark Matter - NASA Science
It *was* in the form of stars!
They *did* underestimate the amount of inelastic scattering taking place.
It *was* found in "hot clouds" of bayrons that we couldn't detect when that false statement was first written. We did *finally* detect the absorption, but it took awhile. We *do* see all sorts of signs of matter and antimatter annihilation signatures from space. the mainstream is *constantly* trying to
pass them off as emissions from 'dark matter" in fact.
Every single one of those claims has been *falsified* by later studies. NASA simply ignored it.
Worse yet, we've been busy in the lab looking for 'exotic matter', mostly because without it, Lambda-CDM cannot accurately fudge the nucleosynthesis numbers. Unfortunately while LHC was was very kind indeed to the standard particle physics model, and helped us find the Higgs Boson,
it wasn't kind at all to exotic matter claims. In fact, LHC falsified SUSY's own 'golden test'!
Next came the LUX results, where they found exactly no events when they predicted/expected about 1600 events from WIMP theory. Strike two in the lab for exotic matter claims.
Then of course there were the electron roundness experiments. Exotic matter theories predicted that the electron wouldn't be round, rather it would be elongated.
Unfortunately that 'prediction' of exotic matter theory was also falsified in the lab.
Three straight falsifications of mass estimation techniques, and three straight falsifications of exotic matter theory.
What's the mainstream done about it? Nothing! NASA never once updated that series of false claims about what they *knew it wasn't*. The mainstream still insists that 'exotic matter did it' only because they *need* a fudge factor for nucleosynthesis predictions. The whole thing has been falsified at least 6 different times in six different ways, yet they do absolutely *nothing* about it!
What is up with that?