berachah said in post #23:
The temple of God is that which houses the presence of God.
That's right, and nothing forbids the future, 3rd temple from housing the presence of God (see post #21).
To suggest that God might recognize the works of ungodly men . . .
What he'll be recognizing is the Old Covenant Mosaic law, which remains holy before him (Rom. 7:12) (see post #21).
When the Jews are reconciled to God it will be because they have recognized Jesus Christ as the Son of God and they will be reconciled through the Body of Christ.
That's right.
God's people are not of this earth, they have a heavenly kingdom to which they look.
Presently the kingdom of God is in heaven (2 Tim. 4:18, Heb. 12:22-24), and is on the earth spiritually within Christians (Rom. 14:17, Lk. 17:21). In the future, the kingdom will come fully upon the earth as it is in heaven (Mt. 6:10). It will be physically (Lk. 22:30, Mt. 19:28) on the earth (Rev. 5:10), first during the millennium (Rev. 20:4-6, 2:26-29) and then on the new earth (Rev. 21:1-8).
Jesus' kingdom is Israel (Jn. 1:49, 12:13-15, 19:19, Lk. 22:30). That's why at his 2nd coming, he'll sit on the earthly throne of David (Lk. 1:32, Isa. 9:7) and restore the kingdom to Israel (Acts 1:6-7, 3:20-21). Jesus is, in his humanity, the son of David (Mt. 1:1, 21:15-16, Rom. 1:3), of the house of David (Lk. 1:69). So at Jesus' 2nd coming, he will restore the tabernacle, the house, of David (Isa. 16:5, Amos 9:11), to its royal glory (2 Sam. 5:12), which it had lost (2 Kin. 17:21a), and fulfill the prophecy and prayer of 2 Sam. 7:16-29. And Jesus will also bring salvation to all the unbelieving elect Jews of the house of David, for they (along with all other unbelieving elect Jews) will come into faith in Jesus when they see him at his 2nd coming (Zech. 12:10-14, 13:1,6, Rom. 11:26-31). And so they'll all become part of the church at that time, for there are no believers outside of the church (Eph. 4:4-6).
After Jesus' 2nd coming (Rev. 19:7-20:3) will occur the millennium (Rev. 20:4-6), during which, Gentile nations will come up to seek the returned Jesus ruling the whole earth (Zech. 8:22, 14:9, Ps. 72:8-11) upon the restored throne of David (Isa. 9:7) in the earthly Jerusalem (Isa. 2:1-4, Zech. 14:8-11,16-19). And the physically resurrected church will reign on the earth with him during the millennium (Rev. 20:4-6, 5:10, 2:26-29), for the church is Israel (Rev. 21:9,12) (see the last part of post #21). Also see the "4th temple" part of post #21.
. . .the end times fulfillment are spiritual events . . .
They also involve physical events. Just as the glorious return of Jesus in Rev. 19:7-20:3 has never been fulfilled, but will be fulfilled physically in our future, so the highly-detailed and chronological events of the preceding tribulation in Rev. chs. 6-18 have never been fulfilled, but will be fulfilled physically in our future. Also, the millennium will be physical, and will begin after Jesus' 2nd coming (Rev. 19:7-20:6, Zech. 14:3-21), when he'll reign on the earth with the physically resurrected church for 1,000 years (Rev. 20:4-6, 5:10, 2:26-29, Ps. 2, 66:3-4).
Spiritualism, as well as symbolicism, preterism (whether full or partial), historicism (in its various modern forms), and pre-trib rapturism, could all be animated by the same spirit of fear, that the church alive today throughout the world would otherwise have to physically suffer through the future, literal, worldwide tribulation of Rev. chs. 6-18/Mt. 24. For these 5 views of spiritualism, symbolicism, preterism, historicism, and pre-trib rapturism, in their different ways, each gives a mistaken assurance to the church alive today that it won't have to physically suffer through that trib.
Spiritualism says the trib is only spiritual events. Symbolicism says the trib is only symbolic of theological themes those in the church have always had to struggle with (e.g. Mt. 6:24), or is symbolic of only-local persecutions that some in the church have always had to face, and are still facing today. Preterism says the trib happened in 70 AD. Historicism says the trib happened over a long period in history (e.g. during the rise and height of the power of the RCC in Europe during the Middle Ages and after, or during the rise and spread of Islam in the Middle East and elsewhere during the Middle Ages and after). And pre-trib rapturism says Jesus will return and rapture the church into the 3rd heaven before the trib begins.
But when the literal, worldwide trib begins in the future, the shaky doctrinal wall which (in their different ways) these 5 views have each tried to build up between the church and the trib, will be completely shattered (Ezek. 13:10-12) as the church worldwide begins to physically suffer through the trib (Mt. 24:9-31, Rev. 13:7-10, 14:12-12, 20:4). These 5 views may have left some in the church completely unprepared mentally to undergo this physical suffering, to where these 5 views could even contribute to some in the church ultimately losing their salvation (Heb. 6:4-8, Jn. 15:6, 2 Tim. 2:12, Mk. 8:35-38, Col. 1:23, Heb. 3:6,12,14, 10:38-39) because of committing apostasy during the trib, when they became "offended" that God was making them and their little ones physically suffer through it (Mt. 24:9-12, 13:21, Isa. 8:21-22, Lk. 8:13).
Even though the church alive today throughout the world will have to physically suffer through the future, literal, worldwide trib. of Rev. chs. 6-18/Mt. 24, the church need not fear this (cf. 1 Pet. 4:12-13, Rev. 2:10), for even though many in the church will suffer and die during that time (Rev. 13:7-10, 14:12-13, 20:4, Mt. 24:9-13), this will be to their gain (Philip. 1:21,23, 2 Cor. 5:8, 4:17-18, 2 Tim. 2:12), and it won't rob them of the blessed hope (Titus 2:13) of obtaining eternal life (Titus 1:2, 3:7) in an immortal, physical resurrection body (Rom. 8:23-25, Philip. 3:21, Lk. 24:39) at Jesus' 2nd coming (1 Cor. 15:21-23,51-53, 1 Thes. 4:15-16, Rev. 20:4-6), which will occur immediately after the trib (Mt. 24:29-31, Rev. 19:7-20:6).
The fact that they prayed at the temple did not make the sacrificial system or the Old covenant relevant.
That's right, but it made the temple itself still relevant.
Any person wanting to abide by the old covenant needs to fulfil every part of the law . . .
That's right. And even if believers want to keep just 1 part of the letter of the Old Covenant Mosaic law (the OCML), such as the OCML sabbath, thinking they have to, they're as fallen from grace (Gal. 5:4) as believers who keep the letter of the OCML circumcision thinking they have to (Gal. 5:2). They've become debtors to perform the letter of the entire OCML (Gal. 5:3); they've placed themselves under its curse (Gal. 3:10). Believers, both Jews & Gentiles, don't need to keep any part of the letter of the OCML, not even the OCML sabbath, for even the letter of the 10 commandments written and engraven in stones (2 Cor. 3:7, Deut. 4:13) was part of the abolished OCML's ministration of death (2 Cor. 3:6-7, Num. 15:32-36) which has been replaced by the New Covenant (Jer. 31:31-34) ministration of the spirit (2 Cor. 3:6-18), in which believers are delivered from the letter of the OCML and keep the spirit (Rom. 7:6) of all the OCML's commandments by loving others (Rom. 13:8-10).
Any person wanting to abide by the old covenant needs to fulfil every part of the law and even that is now worthless . . .
Re: "that is now worthless", if by "that" you mean the OCML in itself, it's still holy before God (Rom. 7:12).
Any person wanting to abide by the old covenant needs to fulfil every part of the law and even that is now worthless because of Christ who has fulfilled the whole law . . .
Re: "Christ who has fulfilled the whole law", if you're referring to Matthew 5:17-20, the separate passage of Luke 24:44-46 shows that Matthew 5:17-18 means that Jesus came the first time not to abolish the prophecies in the Mosaic law and the Old Testament prophets regarding the Christ's first coming, but to personally fulfill all those prophecies (e.g. Acts 3:22-24, Isaiah 53).
Matthew 5:17-18 can't mean (as is sometimes claimed) that Jesus came the first time not to abolish the letter of the commandments of the Old Covenant Mosaic law, because Ephesians 2:15-16, Hebrews 7:18-19, Colossians 2:14-17, 2 Corinthians 3:6-18, and Romans 7:6 show that he did come to do that, on the Cross.
Also, Matthew 5:17-18 can't mean that Jesus came the first time to fulfill the letter of all the commandments of the Old Covenant Mosaic law, because he couldn't possibly have done that. For example, some Old Covenant Mosaic commandments applied only to women after childbirth (Leviticus 12:4-8), or to wives suspected of adultery by their husbands (Numbers 5:19-31).
As the Christ (Matthew 5:17, Luke 24:44-46), the mediator of the New Covenant (Hebrews 12:24, Matthew 26:28, Hebrews 7:22, Hebrews 8:6-8), Jesus had the divine authority to contradict the letter of Old Covenant Mosaic commandments and replace them with his own, even better, New Covenant commandments (Matthew 5:38-44, Matthew 19:7-9, John 8:5-7), such as those he gave in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5:19-7:29) and in the writings of Paul the apostle (1 Corinthians 14:37, cf. 1 Thessalonians 4:2). And as the Christ, Jesus had the divine authority to allow his disciples to break the letter of Old Covenant Mosaic commandments (Matthew 12:1-8).
Any person wanting to abide by the old covenant needs to fulfil every part of the law and even that is now worthless because of Christ who has fulfilled the whole law and given new meaning to each and every law of the Old Covenant.
Re: "given new meaning to each and every law of the Old Covenant", what scriptures are you referring to? Jesus & Paul said the spiritual meaning of every part of the OCML is loving others (Rom. 13:9-10, Mt. 7:12).
How does Spirit filled worship become secondary to dead animals?
It doesn't, just as currently it doesn't become secondary to the bread and wine of communion (Mt. 26:26-29, 1 Cor. 11:27-30, Jn. 6:53-57).
And to compare the blood of Christ to that of animals should offend every sound thinking Christian.
It shouldn't (for the Bible does that: Hebrews 9:13-28), just as not only comparing, but equating the blood of Christ and the wine of communion, shouldn't offend any Christian (Mt. 26:28-29, 1 Cor. 11:27-30, Jn. 6:53-57).
The only thing Christ is building is spiritual and heavenly....the rest is irrelevant.
That which is spiritual doesn't make that which is physical irrelevant. Believers need to be careful not to be deceived by the Gnostic/antichrist lie that Christ isn't in the flesh (2 Jn. 1:7) and that believers won't forever be in the flesh. The Bible shows that Jesus Christ wasn't resurrected as a disembodied spirit, but in his fully-human flesh and bones body (Lk. 24:39, Heb. 2:17). That's why his tomb is empty (Mt. 28:6) and why he still has the wounds of the crucifixion on his resurrection body (Jn. 20:25-29). Lk. 24:39 didn't stop being true once Jesus ascended into heaven, for he will remain our fully-human mediator/high priest forever (1 Tim. 2:5, Heb. 7:24-26), in human flesh, just like we're in human flesh (Heb. 2:17). And when he returns he will still have the wounds of the crucifixion on his body (Zech. 13:6, 12:10-14).
Gnosticism mistakenly thinks that flesh is evil in itself, and that only that which is pure spirit can be good. But Jesus proves that flesh isn't evil in itself, for he's been made flesh (Jn. 1:1,14, Rom. 1:3, Lk. 24:39) and remains wholly without sin (Heb. 4:15). Genesis also proves that flesh isn't evil in itself, but was created by God as something very good (Gen. 1:31). Adam & Eve were flesh, for they were the progenitors of the human race alive today. And they were immortal before they fell into sin, because it was only their falling into sin which made them become mortal (Gen. 2:17). So Adam & Eve started out as immortal flesh. So the future resurrection or changing of the saved into immortal flesh bodies like Jesus has (1 Cor. 15:21-23,51-53, Philip. 3:21, Lk. 24:39, Rom. 8:23-25) will be God allowing all of saved humanity to partake of the original, very good, immortal flesh condition of Adam & Eve in the Garden of Eden before their fall into sin.
Also beware the more-general Gnostic lie that even the entire physical universe is evil in itself, and that only a purely-spiritual heaven can be good, for this lie is employed by Gnosticism to revile the Creator YHWH as some sort of evil, tyrant god, whom Gnosticism says created the physical universe as a foul prison house for the free spirits of humans, whom Gnosticism says by some accident fell from a purely-spiritual heaven into the physical universe and became trapped within fleshly bodies. No doubt the coming Antichrist will employ this lie as part of his utter reviling of YHWH (Rev. 13:6, Dan. 11:36). But Genesis shows that our physical world was created by YHWH as something very good (Gen. 1:31).
And the Bible shows that the whole plan of Creation wasn't that humans, who are both flesh and spirit (1 Thes. 5:23, Lk. 24:39), would become purely-spiritual ghosts and float forever on clouds in a purely-spiritual heaven with God, but that God would become both flesh and spirit like man (Jn. 1:1,14) and that God would ultimately come down out of heaven to live with man on a new earth (Rev. 21:1-4), just as God had walked on the earth in the Garden of Eden with Adam & Eve (Gen. 3:8). Also, on the new earth, all of saved humanity will be allowed to eat from the tree of life (Rev. 2:7, 22:2,14), just as Adam & Eve hadn't been forbidden to eat from it in their unfallen state (Gen. 2:9,16-17). So, with regard to saved humans, God will completely undo the effect of the fall of Adam & Eve. All of saved humanity will be able to live in an earthly, physical paradise forever with God (Rev. 2:7), just as Adam & Eve and all their descendants might have done had not Adam & Eve fallen into sin.
So beware the Gnostic lie. Beware the Antichrist.