Cryptozoology in the Bible pwns Evolution

[Cabal]

You dig them up, if you want them so badly; but whether you do or not, they pwn evolution.

No, your point, you back it up if you want people to believe you or give you any credibility.

But then (intellectual) honesty isn't your strong suit really, is it?

 

[AV1611VET]

No, your point, you back it up if you want people to believe you or give you any credibility.

But then (intellectual) honesty isn't your strong suit really, is it?

If you're telling me that these animals on this list don't pwn evolution, I'm not listening.

Then again, I've noticed just recently that you guys won't admit to anything pwning evolution -- so I guess I can see where you're coming from.

If rabbits in the Precambrian won't do it anymore -- nothing will, eh?

 

[Upisoft]

If you're telling me that these animals on this list don't pwn evolution, I'm not listening.

*fingers in the ears*. la-la-la-la-la!!!!

 

[Skavau]

You dig them up, if you want them so badly; but whether you do or not, they pwn evolution.

What are you talking about? There's no reason to look for any of the creatures listed in your original post and no reason to think that not finding them will hurt or "pwn" evolution. Seriously, are you even trying anymore? Why on earth do you imagine they would?

If you're telling me that these animals on this list don't pwn evolution, I'm not listening.

So you refuse to listen to any counter-arguments that would dispute what you say? You are literally embracing ignorance over some actual self-criticism where you can learn through having your complete non-understanding of common ground pointed out.

Then again, I've noticed just recently that you guys won't admit to anything pwning evolution -- so I guess I can see where you're coming from.

Why do you think that the mythological animals in the original post "pwn" evolution? When you say evolution is "pwned" what does that even mean?

 

[Skavau]

If rabbits in the Precambrian won't do it anymore -- nothing will, eh?

You want to find something that actually exists that negates the biological theory of evolution. Citing mythological creatures doesn't cut it.

 

[Freodin]

Following is a list of animals found in the Bible:

1. fowled bat
2. behemoth
3. leviathan
4. four-legged grasshopper
5. satyr
6. unicorn
7. dragon
8. straw-eating lions

I contend that these animals are problematic for evolutionists.

As with most of your "challenges" or "questions", you consistently miss the point.

In order to show that evolution would have any problems with these beings, you would have to show why there should be any problems. In order to do so, you would have to present these beings with the same level of informations as, err, "real" lifeforms.

Just naming them is not enough.

 

[Matthew712]

Following is a list of animals found in the Bible:

1. fowled bat
2. behemoth
3. leviathan
4. four-legged grasshopper
5. satyr
6. unicorn
7. dragon
8. straw-eating lions

I contend that these animals are problematic for evolutionists.

It's hard to admit, but the only logically sound conclusion is that evolution is wrong, and since evolution is wrong the only other logical possibility is that God made the universe 6,015 years ago as described by the holy book of bronze age nomads. Thanks for lifting the veil placed by those evilutionist conspirators to destroy God's Word and opening my eyes to the truth at last!

 

[CaliforniaSun]

I guess it depends where your heart is, eh?

It's left of midline in the mediastinal cavity of course. Where's yours?

 

[AV1611VET]

It's left of midline in the mediastinal cavity of course. Where's yours?

I left my heart in San Francisco.

 

[Delphiki]

If rabbits in the Precambrian won't do it anymore -- nothing will, eh?

Have you found one?

 

[Cabal]

If you're telling me that these animals on this list don't pwn evolution, I'm not listening.

They don't pwn evolution, diddums, because they haven't been shown to exist.

Then again, I've noticed just recently that you guys won't admit to anything pwning evolution -- so I guess I can see where you're coming from.

You wouldn't know how to pwn evolution if you wanted to - you're a creationist.

If rabbits in the Precambrian won't do it anymore -- nothing will, eh?

The quote implied an actual discovery, i.e. they would need to (a) exist (b) be actually dug up and presented. Hint hint. I'll give you an even bigger hint because I'm feeling sympathetic - nowhere on that list does the phrase "repeating the same irrelevant claims over and bloody over" appear.

Hop to it, and stop strawmanning.

/thread.

 

[ReverendDG]

If you're telling me that these animals on this list don't pwn evolution, I'm not listening.

so you aren't listening to people tell you the truth? wow bro.

Then again, I've noticed just recently that you guys won't admit to anything pwning evolution -- so I guess I can see where you're coming from.

well first it has to "pwn" evolution, and what you claim doesn't "pwn" anything because you can't prove they existed or still exist.

If rabbits in the Precambrian won't do it anymore -- nothing will, eh?

of course rabbits in the precambrian would refute evolution, any evidence that they have found a rabbit in the precambrian?

so.. how does stuff you can't even show existed "pwn" anything again? right.. they don't.

 

[AV1611VET]

They don't pwn evolution, diddums, because they haven't been shown to exist.

Keep looking -- diddums.

There's probably stuff down there your best computers haven't classified yet.

You wouldn't know how to pwn evolution if you wanted to - you're a creationist.

No, but when AYBABTU gets here, it's curtains for evolution.

 

[Cabal]

There's probably stuff down there your best computers haven't classified yet.

And when you find it for us, we'll listen to you.

Until then, back to the back of the class - you're still a few dozen decades behind the rest.

No, but when AYBABTU gets here, it's curtains for evolution.

Bad translation reference. How ironic. Keeping up a bit of a theme with that incoherent religious text you worship, are we?

 

[AV1611VET]

so you aren't listening to people tell you the truth? wow bro.

I've got news for you, reverend:* evolution ≠ Truth.

This means Darwin's Disciples can preach to me all day, and I'm not listening.

* I'm surprised my buddy here hasn't called you out on being 'narcissistic'.

 

[CaliforniaSun]

I left my heart in San Francisco.

Great city! Ever been there?

 

[Cabal]

I've got news for you, reverend:* evolution ≠ Truth.

Steady on there, junior. What has evolution to do with this? I pointed out that no-one is required to believe you if you aren't even going to provide a shred of evidence - which is completely correct.

This means Darwin's Disciples can preach to me all day, and I'm not listening.

* I'm surprised my buddy here hasn't called you out on being 'narcissistic'.

If I were to then I'm sure you'd be upset that someone else was getting the attention.

 

[AV1611VET]

And when you find it for us, we'll listen to you.

Ya -- just like Harold Cook & company.

We commoners find things, then you 'scientists' get the credit for it.

I always cringe when I think of how the common women of the time produced the evidence for the 'educated' that Thalidomide was indeed a 'wonder drug'.

(Only it wasn't the commoners doing the wondering.)

 

[AV1611VET]

Great city! Ever been there?

San Diego -- (but I have seen Dirty Harry about a dozen and a half times).

 

[Cabal]

Ya -- just like Harold Cook & company.

We commoners find things, then you 'scientists' get the credit for it.

LOL!! That was good, AV. Really. The notion of you actually discovering something....brilliant.

Credit is given where credit is due.

I always cringe when I think of how the common women of the time produced the evidence for the 'educated' that Thalidomide was indeed a 'wonder drug'.

Why didn't Yahweh warn one of you, then? Maybe you're right. Maybe we are hogging the credit.

Credit for those dead babies goes to Yahweh, by merit of negligence.

You must be very proud!