I recommend a non-Christian, who argues against evolution.
His material is non-inspired, so if you're used to reading scripture or other Christians, his writing is not like that, however it is factually correct. Since evolution must exist in the world of facts, it can be refuted in the world of factual knowledge.
Concerning the mathmatics against evolution, he cites "The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_theory_of_molecular_evolution
And if you study the math yourself on this issue, you realize the impossibility of evolution based upon this. Things can change, they can degrade, and they can incorporate other genomes that exist, but they cannot create genetic material due to the limitations of information theory (the key argument at the heart of the mathematics.)
There is a prize related to this, if anyone can demonstrate the mechanism which creates information, demonstrating it is not evolution otherwise the prize would be won. Random + N.S. has been disproven as a mechanism to generate information, due to the limitations described in the Neutral Theory.
http://cosmicfingerprints.com/solve/
And this points to creationism because, in information theory, all information that exists, could not have arisen randomly. While evolution asserts this is exactly what happened, information theory puts forth this is impossible, using all known math/physics to substantiate this impossibility as proof. Whatever mechanism that exists which creates information, it is not a random mechanism.
And so the prize is for discovering the mechanism. If the mechanism were random + N.S. then the prize would be won already, but it's not won, because no one has observed this occurring.
The reason it does not occur is that to make data randomly, you must multiply probabilities.
N * N = A or N^2 = A
So when you string together a DNA strand it can become something like 1 out of a statistically "impossible" number, for each major mutation. Natural Selection will only take hold, if the whole protein strand is randomly achieved. 10% success, by the law of natural selection, achieves a 0% result. So coming close to the real deal information improvement, does not happen... the 10% will eventually be eroded because it has no advantage over 0%.
