Creationism in public schools?

[createdtoworship]

I'm sorry. AIG is not a peer reviewed science journal. AIG is a religious psuedoscience site with no scientific repute. You need ACTUAL evidence, ACTUAL citations. If they're all you have, then you have nothing. Ditto with ICR.

Metherion

what if your not a peer, you wouldn't know then would you?

Here is a good peer allegedly reveiwed paper that gives a better classification of "Mutations" than evolutionists are able to do.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...n-of-mutations

 

[createdtoworship]

That's the point the rest of us have been making in this thread. You can't understand science. You yourself have admitted to it, even call it "boring".

Feel free to stick with your enews if you want, just realize no one is going to be taking it seriously.

enews is fast easy, better than another night at the museum.

 

[laconicstudent]

enews is fast easy, better than another night at the museum.

Of course it actually isn't accurate or truthful, but if you want what is easy, go ahead. The rest of us will discuss science and continue to dismiss enews nonsense out of hand.

 

[ChrisBot]

This thread was split automatically after 1000 replies and this thread has been automatically closed.
The new thread automatically created is here: "Creationism in public schools? (2)"