G
good brother
Guest
Three dinosaurs and eight birds. The three dinosaurs are just that, dinosaurs. The eight birds are all birds. I fail to see any transitions.Genus: Pedopenna, 168-140 million years ago
Genus: Anchiornis,~155 MYA
Genus: Scansoriopteryx, 164-158 MYA
Genus: Archaopteryx, 150-145 MYA
Genus: Confuciusornis, 120MYA
Genus: Eoalulavis, 115 MYA
Genus: Ichtyornis, 93-75 MYA
Heck, Ill even toss in a few primitive birds for you:
Genus: Waimanu, 60-58 MYA, earliest known penguin
Genus: Colymboides, ~37 MYA? (couldnt find much on the date), loon
Genus:Mopsitta, 55-48 MYA, psittacine
Genus: Primapus, 50 MYA, apodiform (the order than includes the hummingbird family
But again, I could list so many differences between dinosaurs and birds that a dead man's head would spin.But, again, it is the differences. What it is made of, how much of it is bone, the openings in it, sensory organs it contains, et cetera. So, no, it isnt.
I didn't move any goal posts. I just spray painted the boundaries for you. You just seem to think that any energy is good energy and all I did was to point out that your examples are all designed to use energy from the Sun. You make it sound as if anything can just go "Eh, I think I'll use energy from the Sun today."Ah, so the goalposts get moved. Yes, sunlight can provide energy to reactions, but theyre all DESIGNED, so it doesnt count. There are a lot of chemical reactions, such as bromination of alkanes, that rely on light to get the started. Hoya plants dont prefer direct sunlight, but do need light, yes, that is true. But what kind of plant are they? Theyre climbers, right? So it would make sense theyd get used to shade and not direct sunlight from the trees and such they are growing on.
And your grass got burnt because of too much sun AND NO RAIN. So, the sun cant provide energy because a combined drought killed your grass? Really?
Once again, I didn't move the goal posts. All I did was point out that the examples you listed are already designed to utilize the wind. None of them said, "Eh, I think I'll use the wind to get my energy or locomotion from."So, again, the goalposts get moved. Yes, there are things designed to use the wind, SO IT DOESNT COUNT.
Again, no moving, just outlining them for you. I was beginning to think you couldn't see them.Same thing. OH, things are designed to be there, SO IT DOESNT COUNT. Moving the goalposts AGAIN.
You keep saying I am moving the goal posts, and all I am doing is demonstrating how you are looking at things that were designed to use the above energies as proof for those energies being the catalyst for the beginning of all life.Yet glass is more organized than sand. So you just toss out a red herring and MOVE THE GOALPOSTS AGAIN. Not only does it need to produce more order, it needs to instantly produce life now? Really?
From a creationist website that you probably won't accept just for the sheer fact of what website this comes from:So did it or did it not show that amino acids can form without life?
In time, trace amounts of several of the simplest biologically useful amino acids were formedmostly glycine and alanine.20 The yield of glycine was a mere 1.05%, of alanine only 0.75% and the next most common amino acid produced amounted to only 0.026% of the totalso small as to be largely insignificant. In Millers words, The total yield was small for the energy expended.27 The side group for glycine is a lone hydrogen and for alanine, a simple methyl (CH3) group. After hundreds of replications and modifications using techniques similar to those employed in the original MillerUrey experiments, scientists were able to produce only small amounts of less than half of the 20 amino acids required for life. The rest require much more complex synthesis conditions.
In Christ, GB
Upvote
0