Common ancestor between chimps and humans

Aman777

Christian
Jan 26, 2013
10,351
584
✟30,043.00
Faith
Baptist
You've only presented claims that you made up in your head.

Here is real evidence.
Address it if you can.

A. Comparative anatomy conclusion- "Organisms that are closely related to one another share many anatomical similarities"http://www.evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/lines/IIBcomparative.shtml

Amen.

B. Embryology conclusion- "Rathke looked at the development of frogs, salamanders, fish, birds, and mammals, and emphasized the similarities in the development of all these vertebrate groups. During his 40 years of embryological research, he described for the first time the vertebrate pharyngeal arches , which become the gill apparatus of fish but become the mammalian jaws and ears" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9974/

Amen.

C. Evolutionary genetics- Four evolutionary forces (mutation, random genetic drift, natural selection, and gene flow) acting within and among populations cause micro-evolutionary change and these processes are sufficient to account for macro-evolutionary patterns, which arise in the longer term from the collective action of these forces. That is, given very long periods of time, the micro-evolutionary forces will eventually give rise to the macro-evolutionary patterns that characterize the higher taxonomic groups. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolutionary-genetics/

Amen or changes within God's kinds and Jesus' kinds.

D. DNA- "A mutation is a change in DNA, the hereditary material of life. An organism's DNA affects how it looks, how it behaves, and its physiology. So a change in an organism's DNA can cause changes in all aspects of its life."http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evolutionary-genetics/
An example of the results of a genetic mutation would be the bipedal hips in Australopithecus
pelvis_and_feet.gif

We can also see evidence of similarities between chimpanzees and humans in human chromosome #2
"All great apes apart from man have 24 pairs of chromosomes. There is therefore a hypothesis that the common ancestor of all great apes had 24 pairs of chromosomes and that the fusion of two of the ancestor's chromosomes created chromosome 2 in humans. The evidence for this hypothesis is very strong."
The analogous chromosomes (2p and 2q) in the non-human great apes can be shown, when laid end to end, to create an identical banding structure to the human chromosome 2 http://www.evolutionpages.com/chromosome_2.htm

Amen. Some creatures LOOK like Humans but Human blood was contaminated with the blood of the sons of God (prehistoric people), Gen 6:4 who were already here when Noah, the first Human (descendant of Adam) to step foot on Planet Earth, arrived. The combination of Humans (descendants of Adam) and the sons of God (prehistoric people) produced the SEVEN Billion Humans (descendants of Adam) alive on Planet Earth Today.

E. The fossil record. If what we know from above is true, we will see transitional fossils in the fossil record. A prediction was made for the Tiktaalik fossil. The prediction was confirmed accurate. http://tiktaalik.uchicago.edu/meetTik.html
There is also a massive transitional fossil record: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils

Amen. This is interesting since we will find the same thing as we go to other Planets. The creatures remain the SAME since they are God's kinds and Jesus' kinds, no matter which Earth we search.

I appreciate Science, just NOT your attempts to make it fit with the False Theory of Evolution. The False ToE is incomplete because it forgot about the Flood which totally destroyed Adam's world. ll Peter 3:3-7 IOW, God's Truth DESTROYS any Theory which does NOT know that Adam, the common ancestor of ALL Humans, was made on another Earth, which was clean dissolved in the Flood.

The SCOFFERS of the last days will not believe this. Do you?
 
Upvote 0

JonFromMinnesota

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2015
2,171
1,608
Minnesota
✟52,766.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
What form of evolution, micro, macro, theistic, Darwinistic, non-theistic?

There is only one form of evolution. You have demonstrated you don't know what you're talking about.
We aren't having a discussion because you just want to play pigeon chess. Good day sir.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
198
✟20,665.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There is only one form of evolution. You have demonstrated you don't know what you're talking about.
We aren't having a discussion because you just want to play pigeon chess. Good day sir.

Some forms are supported by the scientific method, others aren't. Darwinism isn't, for example.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Some forms are supported by the scientific method, others aren't. Darwinism isn't, for example.
Wrong. but then you still do not understand the scientific method. And copying and pasting an illustration that you do not understand does not mean that you understand anything. Once again, let's work on the concept of evidence first.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
198
✟20,665.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Wrong. but then you still do not understand the scientific method. And copying and pasting an illustration that you do not understand does not mean that you understand anything. Once again, let's work on the concept of evidence first.

Let's work on the concept of how any claim is verified as passing the scientific method test or not. (See graphic for details)
 
Upvote 0

JonFromMinnesota

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2015
2,171
1,608
Minnesota
✟52,766.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Let's work on the concept of how any claim is verified as passing the scientific method test or not. (See graphic for details)

You don't understand the scientific method. You make it blatantly obvious. There are posters trying to teach it to you but you're playing pigeon chess.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Let's work on the concept of how any claim is verified as passing the scientific method test or not. (See graphic for details)
No, there is no need. We all agree on that. The problem is that you do not understand your graphic. Since you don't understand that chart you need to work on your understanding of it. Since you do not understand the concept of evidence you will never be able to understand the chart that you keep referring to until we fix this lack of yours.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
What's not to understand? The graphic is very simple.

2013-updated_scientific-method-steps_v6_noheader.png
I know it is very simple. That is why we are all rather amazed that you do not understand it. Here is where your understanding fails. Do you see the green block? Tests of various sorts present evidence. For example every new fossil find is a test of the theory of evolution. It produces specific evidence. The evidence is the particular fossil found in a particular stratum. It is empirical evidence.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
198
✟20,665.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I know it is very simple. That is why we are all rather amazed that you do not understand it. Here is where your understanding fails. Do you see the green block? Tests of various sorts present evidence. For example every new fossil find is a test of the theory of evolution. It produces specific evidence. The evidence is the particular fossil found in a particular stratum. It is empirical evidence.

Yes, I see the green block. What experiments do you offer which occurred in the green block and were the procedures working? (The blue box).

Anything?
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Yes, I see the green block. What experiments do you offer which occurred in the green block and were the procedures working? (The blue box).

Anything?
I already told you in my previous post here. We have not gotten to the blue box yet. Go back and read my post until you understand it or ask questions about the parts that you do not understand.
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
198
✟20,665.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I already told you in my previous post here. We have not gotten to the blue box yet. Go back and read my post until you understand it or ask questions about the parts that you do not understand.

If you've done the proper experiments in the green box, the blue box will either verify or reject the guesses of the red box.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
If you've done the proper experiments in the green box, the blue box will either verify or reject the guesses of the red box.
We have. It works just fine. Unfortunately since you do not understand the concept of evidence you can't see that. You are blind as to what happens in the blue box since you have no idea of what evidence is, the product of the green box.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JonFromMinnesota

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2015
2,171
1,608
Minnesota
✟52,766.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Where? When?

He explained it to you right here:

For example every new fossil find is a test of the theory of evolution. It produces specific evidence. The evidence is the particular fossil found in a particular stratum. It is empirical evidence.

You've demonstrated two things justlookinla.
1. You don't know how to use the scientific method. This part is obvious to every reader.
2. You don't know what evidence is, also obvious to every reader.

You are simply playing pigeon chess.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,001
51,483
Guam
✟4,905,536.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0