She's a Clinton. She'll say what she needs to say to get where she intends to be.
She didn't use to be for their rights. But lookie here, she is now. Timely.
That's entirely possible.Perhaps they(I assume you mean LGBT groups and individuals that expect favors in return) did not used to contribute to the Clinton Foundation but they do now.
Are you suggesting that Hillary Clinton is a homosexual? She is the only one I see being denigrated in this thread to this point.It is a good thing Christians love homosexuals because I would hate to see how they denigrated them if they hated them.
Are you suggesting that Hillary Clinton is a homosexual? She is the only one I see being denigrated in this thread to this point.
“I’m running for president to stand up for the fundamental rights of LGBT Americans.”
Seems like they are trying to denigrate her in a guilt by association with homosexual activists. No?
Are any politicians not for sale, considering they need money for their campaigns? Of course they're going to appeal to people in terms of groups, it's not like Trump's any better, from what I understand. He's just appealing to the lowest common denominator rather than a group that has more general staying power.I disagree. Its about her being for sale not just being for sale to the LGBT political interests but for any interest with the money. Bashing a group is silly, we need to concentrate on individuals as individuals can be bashed for being exactly what they are. Groups have varied individuals each with their own unique story. Hillary is exactly who she is and has been and she can be defined by that without fail without resorting to stereotyping but the LGBT community cannot be so stereotyped as it is not an individual but a varied group with varied individuals with varied interests and varied actions. It cannot be said to be anything but a bunch of varied individuals that have only adherence to a few political positions regarding sexual preference and sexual identity as a common interest. To denigrate one subset of that group i.e. homosexuals as if all homosexuals were all alike would be as ridiculous as denigrating all Christians as if all Christians were exactly alike.
Ah yes, ChristianNews. Such an unbiased news source...
Ah yes, ChristianNews. Such an unbiased news source...
Do you have a problem with other humans not being treated badly?
Are any politicians not for sale, considering they need money for their campaigns? Of course they're going to appeal to people in terms of groups, it's not like Trump's any better, from what I understand. He's just appealing to the lowest common denominator rather than a group that has more general staying power.
Perhaps he can't be bought in this election, but his money comes from selling himself. That's why he puts his name on everything and talks about how great he is.well you can't say he's for sale, since he's using his own money.
Perhaps he can't be bought in this election, but his money comes from selling himself. That's why he puts his name on everything and talks about how great he is.
Doesn't negate that he's basically a corporate shill or otherwise an amateur in terms of political expertise, better suited for his original position as a CEO or the like rather than commander in chief.well you can't say he's for sale, since he's using his own money.
Doesn't negate that he's basically a corporate shill or otherwise an amateur in terms of political expertise, better suited for his original position as a CEO or the like rather than commander in chief.
Do you have proof they're biased as a news source. Do you have a problem with Christian owned news sites?Ah yes, ChristianNews. Such an unbiased news source...
Do you have a problem with other humans not being treated badly?