I just can't picture a scenario where two unarmed people in a car are shot at 137 times in public and it is okay?
Similarly, where someone is standing on the car shooting 49 times????
It simply defies logic. In order for this to make sense in my head, I'd have to take off my skull cap, grab my brain, dunk said brain repeatedly into a vat of vodka and rum then take my brain over to a counter covered with 10-lbs of cocaine, roll my brain around until it was coated with a nice layer of white powder, then put my brain back in my skull and reattach my skull cap...
Look, I get it. Police have to enforce the law yada yada yada... but at some point simple common sense has to take over and there is just no way the chain of events that happened here make any sense or are excusable...
Basically, unless police are caught 100% from start to finish on video tape, they can do anything to anyone who has committed a crime or is "suspected" of committing a crime. All they have to do is say they feared for their safety and that is that. Anything that happens after that point is justified.
At what point does it become a simple execution? 10 bullets? 20 bullets? 40 bullets? 60 bullets? 100 bullets?
I mean, why not shoot the car thousand times? I'm being serious? There is very little qualitative difference in excessive force between 100 shoots and 1,000 shots. I mean, it's like hitting a baby 10 times with a sledge hammer vs 100 times with a sledge hammer. No real qualitative difference...
I seriously just don't know about this country sometimes...