Blue and Oz,
I once more ask that you address my arguments concerning your interpreting the clear by the unclear(faulty hermeneutics)and the cultural significance of Paul's prohibition of fornication. If you are to be consistent in your logic then you must also argue that fornication is OK.
BTW, the constant claim of logical fallacies is a red herring used in order to deflect from actually defending or refuting arguments. Please stop it. If you have a rebuttal argument present it but quit with the accusation of logical fallacies. It reflects poorly on you not us.
there is no reason to address i have moved on. My purpose was not to sway you to what I see, but to show those reading your view is not the only one out there. That has been done. I gave up a long time ago trying to show you anything twin, you want to be right, you will not entertain you could be wrong. I actually gave your view thought, I came to the conclusion it is wrong. If God calls me before Him and say women were not to preach, I would say ok, i am sorry, could you help me see. If He ask why i said they could, I said because the Love in my heart would not let me think of women any differently than equal in or out of the church. But i don't think my Father will say that to me.
You don't understand God is Love. 1 john 4:8. It is by Love we are guided because true love is never wrong. see 1 cor 13. So it is out of Love i bless my Sisters. That is enough for me.
as far as fallacy i only used them because so many people use them on me. I think fallacies are worldly and was making a point. People say that saying the Bible is the word of God because it says so is a fallacy. and I am sure you heard of the fallacy appeal to faith, that states faith is not logical or rational which I could debate in its self.
but my answer is I moved on already.
Upvote
0