What "technobabble"? Plasma redshift, including the kind I mentioned, does show up in the lab. The cause/effect relationships between particle collisions, EM fields, and photons have been *demonstrated* in the lab. The math also works out on paper just like mainstream theory as Holushko's work demonstrates.
I'm also not asking you to 'give up' on empirical physics. The mainstream is asking you to do that, not me.
It's just *an example* of the time delays between various wavelengths. All photons, regardless of wavelength, interact with the medium between here and there. No photon is unaffected by the collision process. Some photons experience *more* time delays than others, some experience more signal broadening than others, etc.
You asked me specifically how we might "test" both theories. I explained one primary way to do that. I didn't hand you any technobabble about invisible stuff that fails to show up in the lab. I handed you a direct answer based on what has been *learned in the lab* over the past 50 years in terms of how photons interact with EM fields and particles.
I can only give you what you ask me for. I can't force you to agree with me. There's no point in blaming the messenger however when I handed you a perfectly good way to differentiate between the two theories in question.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
!
:
!
