Are human remains ever found with dinosaurs?

[AV1611VET]

Of course not.

Ya ... I know.

You're a deist.

Meaning you'll "correct" the KJB against the Hebrew, but in reality, even the Hebrew is wrong when compared to science.

 

[RickG]

Ya ... I know.
Meaning you'll "correct" the KJB [sic] against the Hebrew, but in reality, even the Hebrew is wrong when compared to science.

I just looked at Biblegateway which carries 150 versions of the bible, one of which does correct the original KJV. There are also (Christian) websites that document these corrections and explain why.

Now, what language was it that Adam & Eve spoke?

 

[AV1611VET]

I just looked at Biblegateway which carries 150 versions of the bible, one of which does correct the original KJV.

Why did you put 'sic' next to my "KJB"?

 

[RickG]

Why did you put 'sic' next to my "KJB"?

KJV

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Ya ... I know.

You're a deist.

Meaning you'll "correct" the KJB against the Hebrew, but in reality, even the Hebrew is wrong when compared to science.

No, I'll correct PEOPLE who try to use the Bible for science when it is to be used as nothing more than religious text.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, I'll correct PEOPLE who try to use the Bible for science ...

Nice try.

I don't use the Bible for science, and am on record as saying such -- many times.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Nice try.

I don't use the Bible for science, and am on record as saying such -- many times.

... riiiight. I'll believe that when I actually see it.

 

[Armoured]

I just looked at Biblegateway which carries 150 versions of the bible, one of which does correct the original KJV. There are also (Christian) websites that document these corrections and explain why.

Now, what language was it that Adam & Eve spoke?

Certain YEC types will, with a straight face, claim they spoke Jacobean English.

 

[AV1611VET]

... riiiight. I'll believe that when I actually see it.

Actually see what?

Again ... you won't see me use the Bible for science.

The Bible contains some prescience ... such as Job mentioning what will later become electronic communication, but you won't see me use the Bible for science.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Actually see what?

Again ... you won't see me use the Bible for science.

The Bible contains some prescience ... such as Job mentioning what will later become electronic communication, but you won't see me use the Bible for science.

This is you explicitly saying one thing and doing the complete opposite.
It's you using the logical fallacy of post hoc ergo proctor hoc to say that the Bible has a scientific fact that we know about today in it when it clearly doesn't.

 

[RickG]

Again ... you won't see me use the Bible for science.

Then why do you claim that God made the earth with a false age?

 

[AV1611VET]

It's you using the logical fallacy of post hoc ergo proctor hoc ...

Well fabam in ollam polentam, novem diebus antiquis back atcha.

 

[AV1611VET]

Then why do you claim that God made the earth with a false age?

Because I'm a YEC?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Well fabam in ollam polentam, novem diebus antiquis back atcha.

Real mature. Very solid aurum.
Although it did help me realise that I flubbed up the spelling. It's proptor, not proctor. That kind of changes the translation a bit.

 

[RickG]

Because I'm a YEC?

There is creation science literature that suggest that as well.

 

[USincognito]

Fun Fact!

 

[Armoured]

Checkmate atheists!

 

[AV1611VET]

Decide for yourself.

LOL

QV this thing at 05:18.

Your sarcastic guide, Adam, wants to know if this thing is a "turtle."

Any of you evolutionists want to tell me what's wrong with that question?

 

[AV1611VET]

LOL

QV this thing at 05:18.

Your sarcastic guide, Adam, wants to know if this thing is a "turtle."

Any of you evolutionists want to tell me what's wrong with that question?

Well, I guess a creationist will have to answer this.

It's a tortoise ... not a turtle.

 

[dad]

No, I'll correct PEOPLE who try to use the Bible for science when it is to be used as nothing more than religious text.

I'll correct PEOPLE who try to use science regarding origin issues and creation matters, when it is to be used as nothing more than religious text.