Are human remains ever found with dinosaurs?

[USincognito]

What does any of this have to do with whether human remains are ever found with dinosaurs? Why can't you guys just ignore his antics?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You just said it was?

No, I didn't. I clearly said that 'college' as used in 2 Kings is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word 'mishneh' which meant a 'city quarter'.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

What does any of this have to do with whether human remains are ever found with dinosaurs? Why can't you guys just ignore his antics?

They are oddly entrancing in the ignorance. Like a weird siren call.

 

[morse86]

Reptiles never stop growing. Dinosaurs are reptiles. In genesis, man lived longer than 100 years (the oldest being 969 years). Can you imagine the size of a reptile at 969 years? It's a dinosaur (some of them, possible looking like dragons which seems to match up with the ancient civilization accounts of dragons).

However, the "scientific" explanation of dinosaurs is myth....a hoax.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Reptiles never stop growing. Dinosaurs are reptiles. In genesis, man lived longer than 100 years (the oldest being 969 years). Can you imagine the size of a reptile at 969 years? It's a dinosaur (some of them, possible looking like dragons which seems to match up with the ancient civilization accounts of dragons).

However, the "scientific" explanation of dinosaurs is myth....a hoax.

No. Just no. It is impossible for a common lizard to grow to something the size of a diplodocus, especially with the way that the lizard's body is. Basic point: legs going out from the hips and down are incapable of supporting a large body size before the animal becomes incapable of movement. It's called the square cube law.

 

[morse86]

No. Just no. It is impossible for a common lizard to grow to something the size of a diplodocus, especially with the way that the lizard's body is. Basic point: legs going out from the hips and down are incapable of supporting a large body size before the animal becomes incapable of movement. It's called the square cube law.

That's just what pseudo science says about man living to 960 years...the heart just wouldn't be able to support it.

Don't be a fool.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

That's just what pseudo science says about man living to 960 years...the heart just wouldn't be able to support it.

Don't be a fool.

Because it wouldn't. A human of even seven feet has medical problems because the human body is not able to support itself over six feet.

 

[Widlast]

Reptiles never stop growing. Dinosaurs are reptiles. In genesis, man lived longer than 100 years (the oldest being 969 years). Can you imagine the size of a reptile at 969 years? It's a dinosaur (some of them, possible looking like dragons which seems to match up with the ancient civilization accounts of dragons).

However, the "scientific" explanation of dinosaurs is myth....a hoax.

I'm sorry, was that misleading to the point of dumb. They do not stop growing, but their growth rate becomes very slow as they get older. That's why you don't have 60 foot alligators.

 

[Widlast]

They're pretty accurate in many cases for being mythical. Perhaps they actually witnessed them?

Nothing against you personally, but that was a dumb statement. They are not "accurate" portrayals of any living beast, past or present. But, people with an agenda will push the notion that they are accurate.

 

[-57]

Cedars have bushy branches. According to YEC "logic" that would mean behemoth's tail had fur and thus was a mammal.

Checkmate Atheists!!!

Now you're reading a bit to much into the verse. The verse said...."like"... I trust you know how to read and how to use that verse in a sentance.

 

[-57]

Wait, you don't actually believe god has feathers and wings... oh' NVM.

You're actually showing your ignorance. Jesus called Herod a "fox". Do you think Herod had 4 legs and fur?

Do you really not get language?

 

[RickG]

At least they weren't totally devoid of Scriptural wisdom, were they?

I would imagine they were much like Christianity from the 1st century through today, choosing what scripture they like and scripture they discard.

Like our colleges today.

How is that?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Now you're reading a bit to much into the verse. The verse said...."like"... I trust you know how to read and how to use that verse in a sentance.

You're actually showing your ignorance. Jesus called Herod a "fox". Do you think Herod had 4 legs and fur?

Do you really not get language?

And there goes another irony meter up in flames.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I would imagine they were much like Christianity from the 1st century through today, choosing what scripture they like and scripture they discard.
How is that?

The KJV mistranslated mishneh in 2 Kings as 'college' when it actually means 'city quarter'.

 

[-57]

And there goes another irony meter up in flames.

Are those literal or poetic flames?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Are those literal or poetic flames?

 

[AV1611VET]

The KJV mistranslated mishneh in 2 Kings as 'college' when it actually means 'city quarter'.

Where the KJB differs from Strong's Concordance, Strong's Concordance is wrong.

That means that, even if the Hebrew word was "city quarter," the KJ translators corrected it to "college."

My favorite example of this is ...

Acts 12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.

... where they used neither "Feast of Ishtar" nor "Passover," but used a word coined by their predecessors: "Easter."

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Where the KJB differs from Strong's Concordance, Strong's Concordance is wrong.

That means that, even if the Hebrew word was "city quarter," the KJ translators corrected it to "college."

My favorite example of this is ...

Acts 12:4 And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.

... where they used neither "Feast of Ishtar" nor "Passover," but used a word coined by their predecessors: "Easter."

No. Just no, to all of that.

 

[AV1611VET]

No. Just no, to all of that.

You ... you mean you're not KJVO!?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You ... you mean you're not KJVO!?

Of course not.