You don't think it's "far-out" to walk on water, heal blind people, resurrect Himself after being crucified, etc?
By modern standards these examples would be classified as workings of the super-natural. But as we have already discussed, for the ANE, and that is the context of these events, these were verifications of authority. An authority that superseded that of mankind and was in fact proofs of deity.
... if I was trying to convince myself that Christianity is true, then I would carefully investigate the best cases of reported miracles. If nobody can debunk these miracles, then I would have evidence of miracles. Then I would need to convince myself that Christianity is true and the other religions are false. Many religions claim miracles.
This is where you lose logic in your reasoning. I suggested before that you needed to be able to falsify the NT accounts in order to arrive at the conclusion that God does not exist and if He does exist that the Christian religion as presented by Christ is what He desires us to adopt. If you find someone in the present that says they have evidence of a miraculous event, it must necessarily be compared to the Bible in order to verify its authenticity as coming from God. But this is only a secondary miracle. The corner stone of and author of the NT miracles is Christ and these are the ones that were given to authenticate the authority and trustworthiness of the Christian faith, not the everyday miracles that God appears in. These daily miracles point back to Christ’s life, death, and resurrection, these daily miracles are not replacements for the biblical accounts, they point back to them. Otherwise God would never have deposited His self-revelation in the Bible and the request for a miraculous event outside of the resurrection of Christ is nothing short of blasphemy.
Upvote
0