Ugh, what exactly are you so offended by?
The implication that there is anything to be "suspicious" about. I'm not "offended" by the way, I'm confused as to why there is anything "suspicious" about this at all.
Because they choose to. This is hardly the first group of people who wants to help out a specific group of people.I just don't see any reason why charitable causes have to limit themselves to specific groups of people.
Are you also "suspicious" when an organization like the NAACP wants to raise money for African Americans?
The mere fact that you admit awareness of the issue belies the fact that you think it doesn't seem like something people would actually do.I'm certainly aware of the people who get disowned due to gender or sexuality issues, but that practice of putting them out on the streets just doesn't seem like something everyone, even particularly bigoted people, would actually do.
"Queer" is being retaken by some groups of people. That isn't to say that it can't be used as a slur, as noticed by other groups of people who do the same thing.I could have sworn queer was a slur, not synonymous with questioning one's sexuality. I've heard of "genderqueer" but I don't know if there's even a large enough population of those people to determine how many are homeless or not.
The rest I just dropped because I think it was addressed by the above.
Upvote
0