I think I can understand where you are coming from, as I have heard similar things from other women.
Not to get all into it, but my tastes are not in line with the mass media's opinions on beauty, and I have met many men who say the same thing despite their "tastes" being different from my own.
I think that not only is a very limited standard of beauty being sold to us as a whole, but also that people who have different tastes are made to feel uncomfortable about having different tastes, and are therefore much less likely to express their difference.
We should all do the ideal - ignore looks and go for inner beauty, but this is the real, fallen, world and we all tend to have visual preferences of whatever sort. When I am shown Hollywood's idea of a "perfect" woman, I am able to say internally, "All right, they are saying that this woman should be considered most desirable," but the fact is that I have rarely ever even sought to date a woman who looked like that, even when I was very actively dating.
I can't really imagine what it's like for women - we all tend to be much more forgiving of men's looks, weight, etc. It must be horrible at times. But try to remember that the fact that women who will never make it into Sports Illustrated's swimsuit issue are genuinely desired by many, many men. And that these men do not tend to advertise their preferences. And they are not just fetishists or stuff like that.
I hope that I have managed to say what I feel without straying outside the bounds of good taste here.
I definitley agree that society is being sold a VERY limited standard of beauty. It's quite sad that we don't embrace more of what the human race has to offer.
I really appreciate your insight
I never really gave much thought of how men might be made to feel uncomfortable about their different tastes, though the movie
Shallow Hal did give me some thoughts about that.
I also appreciate your concern for what it's like to be a woman. Though after reading your post, I have to say, likewise, that I can't imagine what it would be like to be a man, especially in light of what you say in regards to how many men don't desire the type of woman in Sport Illustrated Swimsuit, but how they don't feel free to express their desires.
I also agree that generally speaking we are a bit more forgivable towards men's looks, but, I do think there is more pressure on men in regard to how they behave or act (ie: what drpepper said about being ignored for the frat boys) and that we are getting less "forgiving" towards men and their looks. I definitley see a movement from women toward the "ideal" man that is being sold more and more often ie: the type of man you'll find in the latest edition of FireFighters annual.
All this being said though, the one part of your post that I am not sure I agree with is the part about the ideal being ignoring looks and only concerning ourselves with inner beauty.
While I think that is definitley a noble idea, I have concerns about that. I dunno, attraction is a very strange thing that I am not even going to pretend to understand, but like you said, I think we all have our visual preferences and I am not sure that is a good or healthy thing to ignore. I think, in light of what you said about people not being free to express our differences in preferences, the issue isn't so much the preferences in and of themselves, but is more so the pressures to conform those preferences to an "ideal" we're having rammed down our throats.
I don't know if any of this makes any sense or if it's all just one big contradiction, but I guess when it comes to attraction there are fine lines that aren't always so easy to define.
Granted, there are some aspects of our physical looks that we have no control over (ie: genetics such as height or breast size), but there are also certain things about our looks that
are extensions of who we are. How one wears their hair for example, the clothes they wear and even to a certain extent the physical build of our bodies (ie: the atheletic build vs. the not so atheltic) can all express something about who we are.
As such, I certaintly don't want to diminish the role of physical attraction, especially in a physical relationship like marriage, but I also think that there are certain balances that need to exist -making sure we don't "love" because of the body, but also making sure that we don't "love" in spite of the body. For example, while I certaintly wouldn't want to be noticed and "loved" because of the size of my breasts, I also wouldn't want to be "loved" in spite of my breasts either. It's my prayer that should I ever marry, that the man I marry will love me for
me- mind, body and soul.
Unfortunatley though, there is this focused attention on the physical that outweighs everything else, to the point that if someone doesn't met the standards of what we are being sold as beauty (ie: if their chest isn't a certain size) then they usually aren't given the opportunity to be known for more than just one aspect of who they are (and in this particular case, that one aspect is one of the things that, unless someone has the money to change, they don't have much control over).