| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |
 | | 
17th February 2004, 06:30 AM
|  | ...haiz...
   
 | | Join Date: 7th October 2003 Location: nil
Posts: 431
Blessings: 92,814
Reps: 208 (power: 0) | |
All animals coincidentally decided to fast for a while after the flood.
there is only a pair of ach animals left after the flood...they must a fast for quite a long long amount of time before they can eat againg so as not to distrct the food chain! |
17th February 2004, 09:41 AM
|  | Disciple of the Annunaki Alliance
39   
| | Join Date: 4th October 2003 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,166
Blessings: 99,939
Reps: 2,512 (power: 13) | | Originally Posted by Cantuar OK, so they ate plants. Which plants? The ones buried under five miles of sediment or the ones that had spent several months floating around in seawater along with a bunch of decomposing animals?
You underestimate the durability of Biblical plants. :rolleyes:
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
17th February 2004, 09:42 AM
| | Disciple of the Annunaki Alliance
39
| | Join Date: 4th October 2003 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,166
Blessings: 99,939
Reps: 2,512 (power: 13) | | | I wonder how the Cactus plants made it through this little ordeal?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
17th February 2004, 11:27 AM
|  | Thief in the Night
25   
| | Join Date: 30th August 2003 Location: New York
Posts: 6,386
Blessings: 9,342
Reps: 29,807,908,674,769,116 (power: 29,807,908,674,784) | | | That's irrelevant. You must only accept Genesis as literal.
You must.
You must.
You must.
__________________
Bushido216 |
17th February 2004, 12:26 PM
|  | The Meat is in the Middle!
33 
| | Join Date: 25th June 2003 Location: Virginia
Posts: 935
Blessings: 91,430
Reps: 41 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Philosoft How come no one's suggested the animals became photosynthetic for a short time? You know, micro-evolution and all that.
I can just see AiG using that excuse now... 
__________________
If we are going to teach 'creation science' as an alternative to evolution, then we should also teach the stork theory as an alternative to biological reproduction. ~Judith Hayes, In God We Trust: But Which One?
"Be happy noble heart... And now the God of vengeance yields to me his power."
Just remember, you are unique, just like everybody else. |
17th February 2004, 01:11 PM
|  | PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
33
| | Join Date: 30th June 2002
Posts: 8,425
Blessings: 2,093,381
Reps: 9,311,669,886,675,212 (power: 9,311,669,886,693) | | | Hmmm, I notice no creationists have ventured an answer. Creationists, I know you're out there. Surely if the evidence supports the Biblical flood, you'd have workable scenario for something as trivial as what the animals ate as the ecosystems re-established themselves?
__________________
Creationism has not made a single contribution to agriculture, medicine, conservation, forestry, pathology, or any other applied area of biology. Creationism has yielded no classifications, no biogeographies, no underlying mechanisms, no unifying concepts with which to study organisms or life. - Botanical Society of America's Statement on Evolution |
17th February 2004, 02:10 PM
| | Disciple of the Annunaki Alliance
39
| | Join Date: 4th October 2003 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,166
Blessings: 99,939
Reps: 2,512 (power: 13) | | | You know I at one time considered the whole "they'd eat carrion" response. Then I watched a show on defense mechanisms for various animals...one of the defenses is "playing dead". Most predators don't like things that are already dead, I hadn't considered that in light of the post-flood food supply issue before. And we aren't talking about "newly" dead bodies...we're talking about bloating decomposing carcases [sp?]!
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
17th February 2004, 09:52 PM
|  | reason, evidence
37 
| | Join Date: 11th November 2003 Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 11,511
Blessings: 91,194
Reps: 27,518 (power: 47) | | | Maybe they ate crabs. Underwater carion eaters would have thrived. Assuming they weren't killed by the million tons of rock that was scoured off the continents. |
17th February 2004, 09:55 PM
| | Junior Member
| | Join Date: 16th February 2004
Posts: 28
Blessings: 90,922
Reps: 11 (power: 0) | | | -Salt killing plants
-Decomposition
-Special diets (go Koala! Eat oak leaf! Come on... eat herb than... ohhh come on...)
-Killer instinct (come on panther... eat from that rotten salty high-pressure-modified carcass... come on... not the cow... NOT THE COW!) |
17th February 2004, 09:57 PM
|  | Vulpes non rectis iternibus currere potest
| | Join Date: 16th September 2003
Posts: 4,597
Blessings: 561,799
Reps: 77,620,427,818,013,792 (power: 77,620,427,818,026) | | Originally Posted by ruixiangz there is only a pair of ach animals left after the flood...they must a fast for quite a long long amount of time before they can eat againg so as not to distrct the food chain!
Well, you see, at this period of time animals were much more disciplined and obedient. After all, God was constantly throwing them into and out of gardens, getting people to shove them on arks and the like. So when they were asked to do something simple, like fast for a decade or five, they were up to the challenge.
This only seems ridiculous now because animals have gotten lazy and easily distractible.
__________________
Past Avatars:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
| | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
