| Creation & Evolution Forum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too. |  | | 
16th February 2004, 02:41 PM
|  | Junior Member 25  | | Join Date: 16th February 2004 Location: Alberta
Posts: 23
Blessings: 91,378
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | Again another question I am not into this belief. But I am trying to think about joining. Yet that'd be hard cause I am in love with a Jew.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>More to the point [this isn't to start a war or anything, I am just looking for answers]
Anyways, how many animals were actually mentioned in the Arc?
How many exist now?
How many were never mentioned, but do exist now?
How can the Arc exist if it can't account for certain animals that do exist now??? | 
16th February 2004, 02:44 PM
|  | Self-proclaimed reincarnation of Eugene V. Debs 22  | | Join Date: 21st December 2003 Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,630
Blessings: 97,114
Reps: 1,248 (power: 11) | | | Well as far as evidence says there was no Ark XD,
but it says he took 7 of each clean beast and 2 of every unclean.
But it doesn't say how many or what kind. | 
16th February 2004, 03:08 PM
|  | HI 28  | | Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 92,056
Reps: 5,365 (power: 27) | | | The common answer is that one of each "kind" was taken on the ark. What is a kind? I dont know and few are willing to define it. The idea is that a form of constrained evolution happend, giving us diversity in each kind, but no kind can ever evolve beyond its kind.
Depending on how you define kind, it changes the number of animals on the ark.
__________________
Wei wu wei
Green faeries | 
16th February 2004, 03:16 PM
|  | PeteAce - In memory of WinAce 33  | | Join Date: 30th June 2002
Posts: 8,425
Blessings: 2,093,298
Reps: 9,311,669,886,675,212 (power: 9,311,669,886,693) | | | Typical estimates I've seen puts the number of animals (or is that pairs of animals) ranging from a few thousand up to 20 thousand or so.
As Arikay said, without a rigorous definition of "kind", it becomes impossible to nail down a number. Likewise, it's also difficult to tell which animals were excluded from the Ark. Some creationists would have insects being excluded, but given the supposed catastrophic nature of the flood, it becomes difficult to think how they would have survived otherwise (although, given the catastrophic nature of the flood it's a wonder the Ark itself survived, but this is creationists begin inserting miracles to rescue their idea).
__________________ Creationism has not made a single contribution to agriculture, medicine, conservation, forestry, pathology, or any other applied area of biology. Creationism has yielded no classifications, no biogeographies, no underlying mechanisms, no unifying concepts with which to study organisms or life. - Botanical Society of America's Statement on Evolution | 
16th February 2004, 03:21 PM
|  | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 8th February 2004
Posts: 310
Blessings: 91,006
Reps: 13 (power: 0) | | | According to John Woodmorapppe there were approx 16,000 animals on the ark.
After the flood they were released and were fruitfull and multiplied. Speciation occured to produce the wde variety of animals that we have today.
For example there was a large cat kind on the ark. No Lions and no Tigers. I don't know what that cat kind looked like.
We do know that the lion and tiger are members of the same cat kind because a lion and tiger can mate and produce offspring.
Sometime after being left off of the ark the lion and tiger MICRO-evolved from the original ark cat kind. | 
16th February 2004, 03:21 PM
|  | Junior Member 25  | | Join Date: 16th February 2004 Location: Alberta
Posts: 23
Blessings: 91,378
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | How long ago did this "ark" thing happen?
It takes thousands, if not millions of years for a creature to evolve from one to another if the "ark" was filled with a limited amount of creatures.
For example, it took 7 million years for the horse to evolve into what it is now. | 
16th February 2004, 03:29 PM
|  | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 8th February 2004
Posts: 310
Blessings: 91,006
Reps: 13 (power: 0) | | | The ark thing was about 4000 years ago
The horse never evolved.
You need to learn about diversity already present within the current gene pool.
Check out micro-evolution | 
16th February 2004, 03:31 PM
|  | HI 28  | | Join Date: 23rd January 2003
Posts: 12,645
Blessings: 92,056
Reps: 5,365 (power: 27) | | This again depends on who you talk to. Its generally between 4500 and 4350 years ago.
Remember, you need to compress everything down to around 6000 years. So the animals hyperevolved, quickly changing right after the flood, then all of a sudden the hyper evolution stops and reverts to the slower type of evolution. Originally Posted by UtahRaptor How long ago did this "ark" thing happen?
It takes thousands, if not millions of years for a creature to evolve from one to another if the "ark" was filled with a limited amount of creatures.
For example, it took 7 million years for the horse to evolve into what it is now.
__________________
Wei wu wei
Green faeries | 
16th February 2004, 03:31 PM
|  | Goodbye, my puppy

| | Join Date: 5th February 2002 Location: South Carolina
Posts: 24,145
Blessings: 311,238
Reps: 224,390 (power: 259) | | Originally Posted by DURANG0 We do know that the lion and tiger are members of the same cat kind because a lion and tiger can mate and produce offspring.
Yes, but the offspring are always sterile.
__________________ Out here in the fields, I fight for my meals. I get my back into my living. I don't need to fight, to prove I'm right. I don't need to be forgiven. | 
16th February 2004, 03:33 PM
|  | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 8th February 2004
Posts: 310
Blessings: 91,006
Reps: 13 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by nyj Yes, but the offspring are always sterile.
Their offspring might be sterile, which shows that the evolution has a limit. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |