Another Romans 1:20 moment

obediah001 · #41 15th February 2004, 09:03 AM

Oh I know a good explanation; he was taken out of context or was making a joke a& didnt know the mike was on right?

ashibaka · #42 15th February 2004, 09:04 AM

Originally Posted by obediah001

You evilotionist refuse to address what you dont like to face. Huxley said "sexual morays" not mores!

I only need to do a three-second Google search.

The biologist, Sir Julian Huxley, was once asked on a British television show why the theory of evolution was so readily accepted by the scientific community. "I suppose the reason we leaped at The Origin of the Species," the scholar replied, "was because the idea of God interfered with our sexual mores." (Kennedy p. 46 CHARACTER and DESTINY)

And as I said, he doesn't need "answering". He's just dumb.

[edit] Actually, I can only find this on gibberish Creationist pages, so I wonder whether he even said that at all.

obediah001 · #43 15th February 2004, 09:11 AM

Ah-ha you know full well the truth of Huxley's statment & you choose to call hinm dumb rather than consider what he said & why, WOW what duplicity! Huxley was an avid EVILoutionist like his grandpa was. You are stunning in your support of said fraud(s). You have No credibility with me at all, "dumb" you say, that is a real laugh, what an explanation of an historical event a notewotrthy one too.

Jet Black · #44 15th February 2004, 09:15 AM

Originally Posted by obediah001

You evilotionist refuse to address what you dont like to face. Huxley said "sexual morays" not mores!

you can stop pretending you know things that you don't now. It's false witness.

ashibaka · #45 15th February 2004, 09:15 AM

Originally Posted by obediah001

Ah-ha you know full well the truth of Huxley's statment

If you would, sir, kindly stop telling me what I know.

Vegan Charity · #46 15th February 2004, 09:16 AM

Originally Posted by obediah001

Ah-ha you know full well the truth of Huxley's statment & you choose to call hinm dumb rather than consider what he said & why, WOW what duplicity! Huxley was an avid EVILoutionist like his grandpa was. You are stunning in your support of said fraud(s). You have No credibility with me at all, "dumb" you say, that is a real laugh, what an explanation of an historical event a notewotrthy one too.

Obediah, what is it that you have to say which is so important?

I will be more than happy to answer all of your questions and concerns, I just need you to formulate your posts more coherently and more succinctly please.

obediah001 · #47 15th February 2004, 09:19 AM

I lost all my stuff had quite a library on Eviloution & Creation in a fire last year so must go from memory on much of what I write here but have been a Christian 15 years & a creationist 13 years. & STILL none of you hasve dared to awnser Huxleys statment, I know you cant directly as it would destroy your faith in Eviloution!

ashibaka · #48 15th February 2004, 09:21 AM

Originally Posted by obediah001

STILL none of you hasve dared to awnser Huxleys statment, I know you cant directly as it would destroy your faith in Eviloution!

Let me get this straight... your entire faith in Creationism hinges on one stupid/nonexistent thing a biologist said?

If I called up Huxley and asked him what really happened, would you stop believing in Creationism?

obediah001 · #49 15th February 2004, 09:28 AM

Huxley is dead now & he made the statment on PBS in the 70's one eviloutionist anowleged he made he statment quoteing it back to me calling huxley dumb for making it .

obediah001 · #50 15th February 2004, 09:32 AM

& my faith in Biblical creation does not rely on Huxleys statment silly I t is one of the many evidences of which shows Eviloution to be a fraud; Huxley was the grandson of the Huxley who was Darwins bulldog, he also headed UNESCO the bullwark of communistic & atheistic subversion for t he eviloutionary faith. Dont tell me he or his statment is of no consequence to the credibility of Eviloution!