Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
LorentzHA, perhaps you can explain to me why the YEC models are not based upon science?
personally I think you typed your statement above because you thought it sounded pretty good. Right?
I just love open ended evo-claims.
Sure, because they are not based on the scientifi method-period. Yes, it does sound good-because it is true. My degrees are in Biology (BS), Sociology (Masters) and currently working on my Doctorate in Medicine (MD), so I am not a Geologist, but I do read a little on it and the YEC flood models are little more than wishful thinking. We have had quite a few threads on the subject and have several Geologists that post here.
Here are few of the many falsifications of the myth of a worldwide flood. Some are from discussions here and some from other sources.
Former YEC Glenn Morton lists a number of falsifications of the global flood mostly from data he collected during his years working in the oil industry.
As far as "open ended EVO staments" every stament about evolution is intterpreted as "Open ended" by creationists because they refuse to accept the "TRUTH".
__________________
None of the gods love wisdom or desire to become wise, for they are wise already -- nor if someone else is wise, do they love wisdom. Neither do the ignorant love wisdom or desire to become wise; for this is the grievous thing about ignorance, that those who are neither good nor beautiful nor sensible think they are good enough, and do not desire that which they do not think they are lacking.
I simply asked for a reason as to why they are a problem. You Irish Guevara seemed to have gotten your panties all in a bunch over the question. Sorry.
So tell me why that is proof that the flood didn't happen?
Better yet, you give us SCIENTIFIC proof that the flood did happen. Obviously you have a problem with reading comprehension. Shenzhou's post said, Incompatible with the flood model...did you not see that???
__________________
None of the gods love wisdom or desire to become wise, for they are wise already -- nor if someone else is wise, do they love wisdom. Neither do the ignorant love wisdom or desire to become wise; for this is the grievous thing about ignorance, that those who are neither good nor beautiful nor sensible think they are good enough, and do not desire that which they do not think they are lacking.
LorentzHA, I don't intend on following each thread trying to figure out just what you mean or don't mean.
Now if you can't put it in your own silly little words, then go away.
Such typical creationists behavior: "I do not intend to read the proof.", right? Silly little words? I have 13 years of college and several degrees...and you??? Educate me Mr. Man, tell me why there was a flood, make me a believer.
__________________
None of the gods love wisdom or desire to become wise, for they are wise already -- nor if someone else is wise, do they love wisdom. Neither do the ignorant love wisdom or desire to become wise; for this is the grievous thing about ignorance, that those who are neither good nor beautiful nor sensible think they are good enough, and do not desire that which they do not think they are lacking.
Well then LorentsHA, stop playing dodge ball and answer the question.
Why is it "Incompatible with the flood model"
OK you got me Durango, it is proof of Noah's flood. Yes, there was a global flood. Happy?
So you are wanting me to to reiterate Shenzhou's article??
__________________
None of the gods love wisdom or desire to become wise, for they are wise already -- nor if someone else is wise, do they love wisdom. Neither do the ignorant love wisdom or desire to become wise; for this is the grievous thing about ignorance, that those who are neither good nor beautiful nor sensible think they are good enough, and do not desire that which they do not think they are lacking.
Well then LorentsHA, stop playing dodge ball and answer the question.
Why is it "Incompatible with the flood model"
Dodge Ball with a nit?
__________________
None of the gods love wisdom or desire to become wise, for they are wise already -- nor if someone else is wise, do they love wisdom. Neither do the ignorant love wisdom or desire to become wise; for this is the grievous thing about ignorance, that those who are neither good nor beautiful nor sensible think they are good enough, and do not desire that which they do not think they are lacking.
Linear Mode
