| Physical & Life Sciences A forum for physics, biology, chemistry and other physical sciences. |  | | 
21st September 2004, 09:31 AM
|  | Maranatha! 48 
| | Join Date: 24th February 2004 Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 2,444
Blessings: 100,074,802 My Mood
Reps: 162,262,507,018,819 (power: 162,262,507,030) | | | Mysterious forces tug at the Pioneer probes. I read this in the guardian recently and thought some of the more scientifically minded might like to see it. http://education.guardian.co.uk/prin...110865,00.html
__________________ "Force may subdue, but love gains, and he that forgives first wins the laurel." William Penn (1644 - 1718) | 
21st September 2004, 11:37 AM
|  | Senior Member
 | | Join Date: 14th September 2004
Posts: 536
Blessings: 130,243
Reps: 467 (power: 0) | | | I'll bet you it's outgassing from the probes. | 
21st September 2004, 01:37 PM
|  | Irish and proud of it!!!!  46  | | Join Date: 7th July 2004 Location: Suffolk, Va.
Posts: 2,105
Blessings: 111,211
Reps: 1,530 (power: 12) | | Originally Posted by Amalthea I'll bet you it's outgassing from the probes.
Out gassing at this stage? I would think any outgassing would have long ago ceased.
__________________ ><> ><> ><> <><><> ><> ><> swimmin' against the flow... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. 1 Cor 4:20 For the kingdom of God is not in word but in power. | 
21st September 2004, 02:47 PM
| | Senior Member 33  | | Join Date: 4th June 2004
Posts: 811
Blessings: 111,433
Reps: 1,333 (power: 11) | | | It's old news, but nobody's managed to explain it yet, but then again it may well just be a systematic error. | 
21st September 2004, 07:48 PM
| | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 17th September 2004
Posts: 490
Blessings: 130,171
Reps: 505 (power: 0) | | 'It's hard to imagine such a leak happening on both probes at the same time in such a way as to produce an identical acceleration,' he said.
My bet would be on particle accumulation. If they're picking up particles in their travels then their mass would be higher then our equations say it ought to be (we don't have statistics on particle density in the outer planetary systems). It's possible our understanding of gravity is fundimentally flawed, and Einstein screwed up as badly as Newton. That would make Quantum Physicists very very happy. | 
21st September 2004, 08:38 PM
|  | Senior Member
 | | Join Date: 14th September 2004
Posts: 536
Blessings: 130,243
Reps: 467 (power: 0) | | | I'll provide a link later when I find it, I forgot the authors name but there was an important paper on this last year by a guy who was a big proponent of an exotic explanation. He now rejects this and favours the outgassing if I remember correctly. | 
21st September 2004, 11:55 PM
| | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 17th September 2004
Posts: 490
Blessings: 130,171
Reps: 505 (power: 0) | | | Meh, outgassing would make a lot of sense if it's one probe, but for two probes (and I'm pretty sure they're both six-sigma precision) to fail the same way? Nah. Not unless there was something major overlooked. On the other hand the space equivelent of air resistance - constant impact with "space dust" would perfectly explain why they're slowing down the same amount. It might be that we've misestimated the density of space dust. It's not much of an effect, but over 30 years? It could make quite a difference. | 
22nd September 2004, 05:59 PM
|  | Now with 50% less irony! 38  | | Join Date: 10th February 2004 Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 261
Blessings: 97,049
Reps: 2,063 (power: 12) | | | It's Planet X!! It's Planet X!!! *dons tinfoil hat* | 
22nd September 2004, 08:04 PM
|  | Senior Member
 | | Join Date: 14th September 2004
Posts: 536
Blessings: 130,243
Reps: 467 (power: 0) | | Here is an interesting paper http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0107092.
And as his usual ascerbic self a Ned Wright summary http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/PioneerAA.html
I've always thought that jumping the gun for exotic physics is not a good idea when using data from 2 probes not designed for this work and even more importantly the fact that planets do not show these accelerations towards the Sun. | 
22nd September 2004, 09:30 PM
| | Regular Member
 | | Join Date: 17th September 2004
Posts: 490
Blessings: 130,171
Reps: 505 (power: 0) | | So an asymmetry in waste heat is all it takes? And an asymmetry of 3% no less? I wonder how many good explainations we can come up with without suggesting the laws of physics are busted?
P.S. WHY do the theoreticals jump the gun? Sometimes things not working right is just that - they're not working right. Doesn't imply the laws of physics screwed up |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |