| Origins Theology Forum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums. |  | | 
1st October 2004, 01:01 PM
|  | Contributor 46  | | Join Date: 16th July 2003
Posts: 6,653
Blessings: 100,032
Reps: 18,396 (power: 33) | | | We also must look at how God works in our everyday lives. Does He micromanage things for us now? Does photosynthesis work on its own, or does God purposefully step in and "push" each event in the direction He wants it to go? The answer, to my mind is yes and no. Yes, He is intimately involved in the process in that He developed the process (or allowed it to develop according to His plan) and, I think we can view God as IN every process. But, no, I don't believe that God makes a conscious, purposeful intervention in every aspect of the workings of life. A part of it is our desire to anthropomorphize God's nature a bit.
And even in the "course of human events". How much does God just "let happen" and how much does He control? Did He just guide that dog to run across my yard? Was that plane crash part of God's specific plan, or was it just life "playing itself out" according to the rules he established? While I believe that God can, and does, intervene in human affairs all the time, is it ALL directly guided, or do some things just happen in the course of natural events? These are more difficult questions, not limited to origins.
We do know that God had a particular and special plan for Man as compared to the rest of His creation. How He implemented the "specialness" of this plan is, and probably will remain, a mystery.
As for science, I think we gain a degree of objectivity by the structural elements of science itself. It is set up to minimize subjectivity by making all proposals subject to peer review and objective standards. So far, it has worked very well to come up with how things actually work. Remember, even the most ardent YEC would have to agree that they fully accept 99.999999% of the conclusions reached by the scientific processes about our natural world. One reason for this success is that contrary ideas which prove to be sound are actually praised and rewarded.
Can you imagine the fame, prestige and even wealth that would come with being the scientist that falsified the theory of evolution or developed a scientifically sound alternative theory that explained the evidence even better? After 150 years this has not happened. What has happened is that many scientists have been praised and rewarded for finding out exactly how the details of the theory play out, even if contrary to earlier concepts of the mechanisms. Change and challenge is welcome in science.
__________________ In matters that are obscure and far beyond our vision, even in such as we may find treated in Holy Scripture, different Interpretations are sometimes possible without prejudice to the faith we have received. - St. Augustine, in his analysis of Genesis. | 
3rd October 2004, 12:09 AM
|  | Junior Member 31  | | Join Date: 23rd September 2004 Location: Leesburg, FL
Posts: 35
Blessings: 90,467
Reps: 20 (power: 0) | | | Thank you all for your thoughtful answers. I'm running a little short on time right now and since I'd like to ponder your ideas a bit, I'll get back to you in a day or so.
Thanks again!
=) Mandy
__________________ "Our highest assurance of Providence seems to me to rest in the flowers. All other things, our powers, our desires, our food, are all really necessary for our existance in the first instance. But this rose is an extra. Its smell and its colour are an embellishment of life, not a condition of it. It is only goodness which gives extras, and so I say again that we have much to hope from the flowers." -Sherlock Holmes, The Naval Treaty
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle | 
11th October 2004, 01:22 AM
|  | Regular Member 52  | | Join Date: 9th October 2004 Location: Marysville, Ohio,USA
Posts: 123
Blessings: 90,598
Reps: 57 (power: 0) | | | I would have to put myself under #3. | 
15th October 2004, 08:04 AM
|  | Nutella is bliss 30  | | Join Date: 9th October 2004 Location: Ohio
Posts: 517
Blessings: 74,044
Reps: 1,861 (power: 9) | | I guess I'm a mix of Progressive Creationists and kind of Theistic Evolutionists. I believe that science says the earth is 4 billion years old, but since the Bible talks a lot about a day/year time, I'm sure it has something to do with that. I'm not sure exaclty where I stand with it, but I do believe that God created everything and made Man special and unique from all of the rest of his creation. Whatever I question today, I'll find out at a later time from God! So I don't feel the need to debate it or worry about it now. | 
16th October 2004, 11:01 AM
|  | Regular Member 46  | | Join Date: 13th September 2004 Location: New Mexico
Posts: 124
Blessings: 90,594
Reps: 74 (power: 0) | | | I am a very happy YEC. I can't get enough of it. It excites me to no end. It's great knowing that God fit everything into his perfect plan. The stars haven't burnt out yet,and nature still does the same things every day and every night. I like reliability. It's a good thing! | 
17th October 2004, 01:28 PM
|  | ~Appeal To Insanity~ 27 
| | Join Date: 28th September 2004
Posts: 1,839
Blessings: 85,437
Reps: 76,409 (power: 0) | | | I'm a dangerous number 8 | 
25th October 2004, 12:01 PM
|  | Me at the Races... 48  | | Join Date: 27th October 2003 Location: Northwest
Posts: 928
Blessings: 69,596
Reps: 4,397 (power: 13) | | | While I lean towards progressive creationism, I'm becomming more of a origins-theology-is-not-a salvation-issue-IST every day.
__________________ "Rock ribbed born again fundamentalist TV preaching bassfishermen..." - You know who you are..... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | 
23rd November 2004, 07:03 PM
|  | Member 28 
| | Join Date: 6th May 2004 Location: University City, Missouri
Posts: 88
Blessings: 90,415
Reps: 56 (power: 0) | | | Definitely a young-earth-creationist here. But it occurs to me -- I once heard a physics professor say that if you rotate a pencil, you can look at that either as a pencil rotating, or the rest of the universe rotating around the pencil. The math works out the same either way. So, couldn't geocentrists always argue that everything in fact revolves around the Earth? It isn't a good inertial reference frame to do math in, but I suppose there isn't anything illegal about doing that.
__________________ This is my Father’s world, a wanderer I may roam Whate’er my lot, it matters not, My heart is still at home. Maltbie Babcock | 
6th December 2004, 05:39 PM
| | Legend
 | | Join Date: 2nd January 2002
Posts: 17,138
Blessings: 1,100,696
Reps: 55,386,685,686,280,104 (power: 55,386,685,686,308) | | | nm
Last edited by TheBear; 31st August 2006 at 12:37 PM.
| 
14th December 2004, 10:02 AM
|  | Member
 | | Join Date: 17th October 2003
Posts: 64
Blessings: 91,385
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by bobbichan I guess I'm a mix of Progressive Creationists and kind of Theistic Evolutionists. I believe that science says the earth is 4 billion years old, but since the Bible talks a lot about a day/year time, I'm sure it has something to do with that. I'm not sure exaclty where I stand with it, but I do believe that God created everything and made Man special and unique from all of the rest of his creation. Whatever I question today, I'll find out at a later time from God! So I don't feel the need to debate it or worry about it now. 
Agree. Let scientists get on with their job and prove to us. We can then go back to the Bible and try to understand the scriptures. Won't that be more fun than trying to second guess how the universe and the living things are formed, based on the scriptures? There are many schools but at most only can be correct. Perhaps none will get it right in all aspects. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |