Origins TheologyForum for the discussion of Creation Science (Young/Old) vs Theistic Evolution. Discussion of Atheistic Evolution should be taken to the Discussion and Debate forums.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
There are Creationists, and there are Realists. Which one are you? - Dracil "The Bible is true, and some of it happened" - Catholic priest
"There may be many other fish in the sea, but there are just as many fishermen." - Dracil
Last edited by Dracil; 8th January 2004 at 07:57 PM.
Reason: added one more link
1. The Bible for the who and why about creation.
2. Pubmed or talkorigins for the how creation happened.
__________________ "If sound science appears to contradict the Bible, we may be sure that it is our interpretation of the Bible that is at fault." Christian Observer, 1832, pg. 437
"Christians should look on evolution simply as the method by which God works." Rev. James McCosh, theologian and President of Princeton, 1890
Creationism is not exactly creation, but is rather yet a scientific view of creation in a literal interpretation.
The Creationism you speak of puts God in a scientific context. This is my logic regarding God theories:
-Science can only deal with that which can be observed and measured.
-God is most certainly beyond our abilities to observe and measure.
-Therefore, to place God in our science is to diminish Him to concept that can fit within the limits of human awareness.
This is the purpose of faith- to go beyond what we can know on our own.
__________________
So Lonestar, now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.
No, we're not putting God into a scientific context. Science is the study of God's creations. All Christian Scientists anywhere, YEC or TE, are trying to do is find the how of God's creation.
__________________
"Arguing with idiots is like banging your head on a rock. All you end up with is a headache and nothing to show for it." - Brian H. West (1986-?)
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I tried to type the address for you but a warning came up that said I don't have enough posts to actually type the address to an external link - but the site name is answersingenesis one word with a .org on the end it. And a www on the front. Hope that gets around it.
Last edited by Pete Murphy; 13th January 2004 at 03:18 AM.
I tried to type the address for you but a warning came up that said I don't have enough posts to actually type the address to an external link - but the site name is answersingenesis one word with a .org on the end it. And a www on the front. Hope that gets around it.
Pete, we've all been there. Yes, it is a resource for creationism. But it isn't a reliable source on creation. That's because the data in God's Creation shows that creationism isn't how God created. AiG has the method of creation wrong. Sorry.
__________________ "If sound science appears to contradict the Bible, we may be sure that it is our interpretation of the Bible that is at fault." Christian Observer, 1832, pg. 437
"Christians should look on evolution simply as the method by which God works." Rev. James McCosh, theologian and President of Princeton, 1890
Linear Mode
