| Serious Stuff The subforum for serious Teen discussions. Please observe our forum rules. |
 | 
30th October 2012, 02:01 PM
|  | Future Youth Preacher
19      
 | | Join Date: 5th December 2010 Location: United States of America
Posts: 2,373
Blessings: 89,734,805 My Mood 
Reps: 286,295,336,897,560,704 (power: 286,295,336,897,565) | | | Lawrence Krauss: A Universe From Nothing
So I've been thinking about this video, and since this is a theory, I figure I can use a theory.
What about the Higgs-Boson Particle? If Higgs is right, then dark matter wouldn't have "mass" or "gravity", and therefore would not "weigh" anything. Therefore, all their calculations would be false.
__________________
"This is our lifestyle. No its not a religion!"
-Lecrae
Ephesians 5 my generation!
|
30th October 2012, 07:14 PM
|  | The Harbinger of Logic and Reason
18  
| | Join Date: 5th August 2012 Location: The Great Nation Of Christopia
Posts: 156
Blessings: 26,195
Reps: 9,223,411,570,862,736 (power: 9,223,411,570,863) | | | But what if Higgs is wrong? At this point all we can do is theorize about most of this stuff. |
30th October 2012, 08:29 PM
|  | Newbie
16 
| | Join Date: 20th January 2012 Location: United States
Posts: 164
Blessings: 16,007,289 My Mood 
Reps: 11,056,272,438,652,428 (power: 11,056,272,438,654) | | | Well, that's why it's so important to figure out whether he was right or not! If he was right, then I guess we'll just have to wait until new calculations are made and see what changes. That's why it's called the 'current' view of the universe. |
28th November 2012, 11:27 AM
| | Regular Member
18
| | Join Date: 24th July 2012 Location: A Chair
Posts: 163
Blessings: 132,299
Reps: 9,262,906,084,231,432 (power: 0) | | | I think that the point was to show that a model can be constructed to show how everything came to be without a god. |
28th November 2012, 07:21 PM
| | Newbie
16
| | Join Date: 20th January 2012 Location: United States
Posts: 164
Blessings: 16,007,289 My Mood
Reps: 11,056,272,438,652,428 (power: 11,056,272,438,654) | | Originally Posted by Shane Plew  I think that the point was to show that a model can be constructed to show how everything came to be without a god.
True, but if that model was constructed using false rules it pretty much means nothing. Maybe a new model won't be able to do as such, or it will be able to do so with fewer guesses. |
28th November 2012, 11:43 PM
| | Regular Member
18
| | Join Date: 24th July 2012 Location: A Chair
Posts: 163
Blessings: 132,299
Reps: 9,262,906,084,231,432 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Gath True, but if that model was constructed using false rules it pretty much means nothing. Maybe a new model won't be able to do as such, or it will be able to do so with fewer guesses.
Well it was an extremely logical model, unlike that of religions. |
26th December 2012, 09:50 PM
| | Newbie
| | Join Date: 26th December 2012
Posts: 12
Blessings: 3,795
Reps: 10 (power: 0) | | | Hi, Lawrence krauss is unfortunately very deceptive in his writing and lectures, when he speaks of nothing he himself admits he is not really speaking of nothing. Krauss's arguments are very flawed in several ways.If anybody wants to debate the validity of his arguments with me they are more than welcome to contact me on skype at jamesiscool47. | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
