How accurate is this summation of God and sacrifice?

How accurate is this summation?

God created man in his perfection with the capacity of imperfection, because through the act of man, thus men fell to the status of imperfection.

God impregnates a human woman and gives birth to the divine...also known as himself...or in common parlance, a Demigod.

So what is asked to be believed is God incarnated himself; to sacrifice himself to himself so you, but only if you believe this true

One is asked to believe God's path to save the imperfect, us. God created man in his perfection with the capacity of imperfection, because through the act of man, thus men fell to the status of imperfection. That is all humanity lost perfection through the guile of a silver tongue talking snake's ability to tempt God's first created. They fell short and sinned, and as a repercussion, so the rest of humanity is rendered imperfect in sin. Yet more than that, God's intolerance for imperfection of falling short consigns the imperfect to an eternal punishment for the act of one man submitting to a guile silver tongue talking snake. But low and behold God provides a means for the imperfect to be saved, for low and behold, and just like other Gods, God loves blood. The route of cleansing sin is blood through the sacrifice of the living. Not just any old sacrifice, for the perfect God needs perfection. Thus the sacrifice has to be that of the unembellished. You see, God desires nothing but the best for itself. At first the saving pathway was through the blood of animals seen as pure, perfect, and unblemished. It was no different than what those nations surrounding had done with humans; and seeing the young were seen as pure, perfect, and unblemished, in accord to those God's perfection, that's whom were sacrificed. So the spilling of blood from perfect animals it is. Monkey see monkey do. But then God decides the blood of animals seen pure, perfect, and unblemished was no longer good enough. So taking a cue again from those other surrounding nations, God concedes only the blood sacrifice of a human can suffice for salvation. The problem however is; God has deemed every living human imperfect. So God working that situation knowing he is solely perfect, he thus reincarnates himself in human flesh, so he can satisfy his perfection by conducting a blood sacrifice of himself yet to himself. So no different then, again, than what other surrounding nations were doing with Gods as fathers and humans as mothers; God impregnates a human woman and gives birth to the divine...also known as himself...or in common parlance, a Demigod.

So what is asked to be believed is God incarnated himself; to sacrifice himself to himself so you, but only if you believe this true, so you now through a human sacrifice no different than what their neighbors had done, can be cleansed and able to dwell in the adode with God.

Several points:

1) I'm not convinced that God created man perfect. Humanity was created with the intent and potential to grow, to mature, to become. Sin isn't the fall from perfection to imperfection, but a weed in the garden that infects, infests, and stunts the growth of mankind to be the full-fledged and beautiful image-bearers of God we were intended to be. I'm not alone in this thinking, this was also the belief of at least some of the ancient Fathers, such as St. Irenaeus of Lyons.

2) God does not require blood, that's a mistake on the part of reading Scripture.

God doesn't need things to be killed, but God does employ the sacrificial system in order to teach His people much larger and important lessons. Lessons learned over time, such as is confessed by David in his Psalm,

"For you will not delight in sacrifice, or I would give it; you will not be pleased with a burnt offering. The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise." - Psalm 51:16-17

The role of the sacrifices were not that God could only forgive, could only pardon, if blood was shed and flesh was burnt; but the role of the sacrifices were to lead men to true contrition.

3) The death of Christ is not about a cultic sacrifice: God requiring spilt blood in order to forgive the sins of mankind.

The death of Christ is about God's full participation in our humanity, even in death. And by death destroying the power of death. Christus Victor.

Christ doesn't die in order to permit God to save and forgive us; by no means. Christ's death and resurrection IS God saving and forgiving us.

Forgiveness is found in the Crucified and Risen Jesus,

who overcomes our sin, destroying its power, liberates humanity in His Person, and now draws us into Himself to share in the abundant and divine life found in Himself. It's about God, in Christ, destroying what enslaves and ensnares us and joining us to Himself, even as He has joined Himself to us in Christ.

So what is asked to be believed is God incarnated himself; to sacrifice himself to himself so you, but only if you believe this true, so you now through a human sacrifice no different than what their neighbors had done, can be cleansed and able to dwell in the adode with God.

It is the life of the sacrifice that is required as punishment for sin.

Blood must be applied for cleansing from sin and consecration, because it is the life of Christ sacrificed in punishment of sin which cleanses the sin of those who believe in him.