| Christian Current Affairs The forum to discuss current news and how it relates to Christian theology. |
 | | 
20th September 2012, 09:31 AM
|  | Fisher of men
39      
| | Join Date: 16th November 2009 Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,854
Blessings: 185,178 My Mood 
Reps: 253,079,295,828,611,200 (power: 253,079,295,828,617) | | | So ONLY the rich are allowed to GAIN during a recession?
Why Didn’t We Fire The Chicago Teachers And Start Over? : Personal Liberty Digest™
This periodical is SUPPOSED to be a libertarian publication. But they are clearly in the tank for Romney.
They are antiunion, and while I don't wholly agree with unions as I believe each man who holds a job should be accountable for his/her performance in that job, I suppose some of my "libertarian" brothers and sisters are of the belief that only the rich should gain during economic decline. ROFL
__________________
I pledge allegiance to Elohim,
and to Jesus Christ my KING,
and to His true mercy, at which I live,
one humble servant under God,
undeservable,
with faith, hope, and love for all! |
25th September 2012, 03:16 PM
|  | Veteran
61  
 | | Join Date: 5th October 2004 Location: Auburn , IL.
Posts: 3,242
Blessings: 12,660,980 My Mood
Reps: 183,058,560,659,987,392 (power: 183,058,560,659,999) | | | rich.... earn a ba, ma, phd, hire on with a pay scale, that recognizes a stipend increase for experience and further education ....
have you looked at salary of congress 400K retirment ea year or 1 million given president for starting another war.....
some one has to start business, pay bills, keep all running...if want more go to school, excel, put in more hours.... |
25th September 2012, 03:33 PM
| | Veteran
61
| | Join Date: 13th May 2008 Location: Davenport, Iowa
Posts: 30,790
Blessings: 90,749,186
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,854,812) | | Originally Posted by Almighty's humble servant  Why Didn’t We Fire The Chicago Teachers And Start Over? : Personal Liberty Digest™
This periodical is SUPPOSED to be a libertarian publication. But they are clearly in the tank for Romney.
They are antiunion, and while I don't wholly agree with unions as I believe each man who holds a job should be accountable for his/her performance in that job, I suppose some of my "libertarian" brothers and sisters are of the belief that only the rich should gain during economic decline. ROFL
Apparently you do not understand the Libertarian party. They have nothing whatsoever to do with liberalism despite the similarity of the words. They are much farther right on most issues than the Republican party. Their end goal is the virtual abolition of government. Their immediate strategy is to reduce government to only those elements enumerated in the Constitution. That means, of course, only an excise (customs) office for taxes and a military. All else is out the window, including education.
They mildly tolerate Romney because he is somewhat more in line with their view than Obama.  |
25th September 2012, 05:32 PM
| | Fisher of men
39
| | Join Date: 16th November 2009 Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,854
Blessings: 185,178 My Mood
Reps: 253,079,295,828,611,200 (power: 253,079,295,828,617) | | Originally Posted by bbbbbbb
They mildly tolerate Romney because he is somewhat more in line with their view than Obama.
You can't be a libertarian and NOT support Gary Johnson, Ron Paul or Jesse Ventura.
To promote another candidate is hypocrisy. Livingston and his cohorts sold me on the idea of smaller govt and tax accountability(closing loopholes and taking back Romney's 77K subsidy for his wife's show horse ROFL).
I subscribed b/c I subscribe to their knowledge of knowing that both the L and the R are in cahoots with the banksters and the corporations and are creating a fascist police state. Now, they are clearly apart of that. As is that Alex Jones. 
__________________
I pledge allegiance to Elohim,
and to Jesus Christ my KING,
and to His true mercy, at which I live,
one humble servant under God,
undeservable,
with faith, hope, and love for all! |
25th September 2012, 05:59 PM
| | Senior Veteran
55 
| | Join Date: 12th February 2010 Location: OHIO
Posts: 4,846
Blessings: 32,891,013 My Mood 
Reps: 1,178,283,143,285,936,896 (power: 1,178,283,143,285,945) | | | I don't know, after seeing the replacement ref's of the NFL should we fire the teachers?
I must admit though, it is entertaining to watch a football game today, never know when or why a flag was thrown. (as long as it isn't on my team). |
26th September 2012, 08:11 AM
| | Veteran
 
| | Join Date: 8th September 2011
Posts: 1,853
Blessings: 11,021
Reps: 212,834,534,318,375,936 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by bbbbbbb Apparently you do not understand the Libertarian party...Their end goal is the virtual abolition of government.
Sounds like he's not the only one who doesn't understand the Libertarian Party.
We don't want the abolition of government and, outside of an MSNBC charicature, you won't find one Libertarian who believes in the abolition of government. |
26th September 2012, 08:22 AM
| | Fisher of men
39
| | Join Date: 16th November 2009 Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,854
Blessings: 185,178 My Mood
Reps: 253,079,295,828,611,200 (power: 253,079,295,828,617) | | Originally Posted by Publius Sounds like he's not the only one who doesn't understand the Libertarian Party.
We don't want the abolition of government and, outside of an MSNBC charicature, you won't find one Libertarian who believes in the abolition of government.
Who's that MSNBC guy your'e talking about? 
__________________
I pledge allegiance to Elohim,
and to Jesus Christ my KING,
and to His true mercy, at which I live,
one humble servant under God,
undeservable,
with faith, hope, and love for all! |
26th September 2012, 08:26 AM
| | Veteran
| | Join Date: 8th September 2011
Posts: 1,853
Blessings: 11,021
Reps: 212,834,534,318,375,936 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Almighty's humble servant Who's that MSNBC guy your'e talking about?
It's a propaganda arm of the White House. |
26th September 2012, 08:31 AM
| | Senior Veteran
55
| | Join Date: 12th February 2010 Location: OHIO
Posts: 4,846
Blessings: 32,891,013 My Mood
Reps: 1,178,283,143,285,936,896 (power: 1,178,283,143,285,945) | | | Who was the propaganda arm of the White House from 2001-2009? I would guess it being Fox.
Libertarians have a out dated mindset concerning 21st century issues. They will never be any real contender in national politics. |
26th September 2012, 08:49 AM
| | Veteran
| | Join Date: 8th September 2011
Posts: 1,853
Blessings: 11,021
Reps: 212,834,534,318,375,936 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Lovely Lane Who was the propaganda arm of the White House from 2001-2009? I would guess it being Fox.
Libertarians have a out dated mindset concerning 21st century issues. They will never be any real contender in national politics.
Yeah, that must be why its top three hosts (Beck, Napolitano, Stossel) were Libertarians who hammered Bush on a daily basis.
OK. I'll bite: how is Libertarians' mindset "outdated"? Are liberty and prosperity no longer good things? | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
