| One Bread, One Body - Catholic A forum open to Christians to discuss various Catholic beliefs and issues. |
 | | 
12th September 2012, 09:19 PM
|  | Regular Member
     
| | Join Date: 24th January 2008 Location: St. Louis
Posts: 3,412
Blessings: 6,071,275 My Mood 
Reps: 413,468,016,566,993,088 (power: 413,468,016,567,002) | | Originally Posted by AMDG  Don't think that this is so unreasonable. A woman married a building in my state!
About the insest thing. I agree. eww.  But I guess it explains the book I saw today. I was looking for a nice *decent* book to read, and I picked up one that I thought would be interesting, but then I read that it was the about the love affair of a father with his daughter and I decided that I'm not really interested. Call me "old fashioned", but somehow that's not a storyline I find even a bit interesting. Sick maybe. But not interesting.
Are you serious?/ Its legal to marry a building?? What the heck??? |
12th September 2012, 09:53 PM
|  | Eat at Joe's
| | Join Date: 14th October 2003
Posts: 11,676
Blessings: 1,120,717
Reps: 216,076,606,880,364,448 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Brooklyn Knight Problem is a majority of states had allowed miscegenation or did not have any laws prohibiting such marriages in the books. The only ones who stood against such marriages were the South, and even they were few and far between.
In 1967 16 states hand laws against mixed marriage. But that's hardly the point is it ?
If all states had laws agasint mixed marriage it would still be a violation of people's rights.
Right's go not come from majority rule.
But even looking at such marriages, theologically speaking, there is no sound or logical reasoning that can be deduced that prohibits why a man and woman of different color should not be wed.
Maybe not to you. But to other people it was. Which is why using a particular theology isn't a good arguement against someone's rights. |
12th September 2012, 09:57 PM
| | Regular Member
| | Join Date: 24th January 2008 Location: St. Louis
Posts: 3,412
Blessings: 6,071,275 My Mood
Reps: 413,468,016,566,993,088 (power: 413,468,016,567,002) | | | I just want it to be legal and moral to murder these people if I do not like them. Perhaps I can start a Church that says it is!! Fannnnnnnnnnnnnnnntastic! |
12th September 2012, 10:11 PM
|  | Tenderized for Christ
63 
| | Join Date: 24th May 2004 Location: Pacific Northwest, United States
Posts: 19,400
Blessings: 11,590,205
Reps: 760,707,024,796,777,088 (power: 760,707,024,796,805) | | Originally Posted by Athanasias I just want it to be legal and moral to murder these people if I do not like them. Perhaps I can start a Church that says it is!! Fannnnnnnnnnnnnnnntastic!
You don't need to find a Church. Abortion does the job quite nicely. It even saves you from feeling a dislike of the people when they are grown.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"There is one true Church, the really ancient Church into which are enrolled those who are righteous according to God's ordinance. In essence, in idea, in origin, in preeminence we say that the ancient Catholic Church is the only Church." - Clement of Alexandria, Stromata
--------------------------------------------------------------
" Choose life, then, that you and your descendants may live." - Deuteronomy 30:19
Team Sarah!--A diverse coalition of women dedicated to values that Sarah Palin stands for
Life Trumps the Economy EVERY TIME! |
12th September 2012, 10:16 PM
| | Regular Member
| | Join Date: 24th January 2008 Location: St. Louis
Posts: 3,412
Blessings: 6,071,275 My Mood
Reps: 413,468,016,566,993,088 (power: 413,468,016,567,002) | | Originally Posted by AMDG You don't need to find a Church. Abortion does the job quite nicely. It even saves you from feeling a dislike of the people when they are grown.
Funny i was thinking the exact same thing. |
12th September 2012, 10:32 PM
|  | On a narrow road but not narrow minded
27  
 | | Join Date: 21st November 2011 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,541
Blessings: 15,132,628 My Mood 
Reps: 199,248,799,844,464,224 (power: 199,248,799,844,469) | | Originally Posted by Cosmic Charlie In 1967 16 states hand laws against mixed marriage. But that's hardly the point is it ?
16. I stand corrected as I thought even less States had barred it before Loving v. Virginia. Originally Posted by Cosmic Charlie If all states had laws agasint mixed marriage it would still be a violation of people's rights.
Depends. Most states still don't grant same-sex marriages. Is that a violation of people's rights? Don't stop with same-sex marriage; look beyond just homosexual acts. Originally Posted by Cosmic Charlie Right's go not come from majority rule.
If you take a look at desegregation, miscegenation, abortion, contraception, sodomy, sodomy between homosexuals, etc., the Supreme Court was able to rule or overrule the way they did by basing it off what most States themselves allowed.
One reason you're not going to gain any traction on the federal level with regards to same-sex marriage: need more states to favor same-sex marriage. Originally Posted by Cosmic Charlie Maybe not to you. But to other people it was. Which is why using a particular theology isn't a good arguement against someone's rights.
Maybe there were people who preached that, but I do know that most in the South still held onto eugenics, that black people were primitive and based it off of antiquated & flawed anthropological, psychological studies and even using physiology to try to distinguish between whites and blacks and how segregation was warranted.
__________________ Tim Tebow: I'm a Christian.
Media: Keep it to yourself.
Jason Collins: I'm gay.
Media: This man's a hero!
-Yahoo User
|
12th September 2012, 11:03 PM
| | Eat at Joe's
| | Join Date: 14th October 2003
Posts: 11,676
Blessings: 1,120,717
Reps: 216,076,606,880,364,448 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Brooklyn Knight 16. I stand corrected as I thought even less States had barred it before Loving v. Virginia. Then lets not make claims that we haven't verified.
Depends. Most states still don't grant same-sex marriages. Is that a violation of people's rights?
Yes.
Don't stop with same-sex marriage; look beyond just homosexual acts.
Huh ?
If you take a look at desegregation, miscegenation, abortion, contraception, sodomy, sodomy between homosexuals, etc., the Supreme Court was able to rule or overrule the way they did by basing it off what most States themselves allowed.
No
This is entirely incorrect. It is not true I do not know where you learned American history but this is not a correct statement.
One reason you're not going to gain any traction on the federal level with regards to same-sex marriage: need more states to favor same-sex marriage.
No
This is not true
This is incorrect
Maybe there were people who preached that, but I do know that most in the South still held onto eugenics, that black people were primitive and based it off of antiquated & flawed anthropological, psychological studies and even using physiology to try to distinguish between whites and blacks and how segregation was warranted
This is also incorrect.
While a fringe beleieved this most mainstrean objections to mixed marriage were based on bibical, thelolgical objections made my religious leaders of various type.
Please let me know where you are getting this from. This source needs to be exposed as fraudulent.  |
12th September 2012, 11:18 PM
| | On a narrow road but not narrow minded
27
| | Join Date: 21st November 2011 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,541
Blessings: 15,132,628 My Mood
Reps: 199,248,799,844,464,224 (power: 199,248,799,844,469) | | Originally Posted by Cosmic Charlie Then lets not make claims that we haven't verified.
SOOORRRYY.
Even then, it's 34 states vs. 16. Originally Posted by Cosmic Charlie Yes.
Same-sex marriage should be afforded?
Well then.... Originally Posted by Cosmic Charlie Huh ?
People's right. Incest, zoophilia, polygamy. Do these people too have rights that are being violated? Originally Posted by Cosmic Charlie No
This is entirely incorrect. It is not true I do not know where you learned American history but this is not a correct statement.
Look at Bowers, Lawrence, Loving, Roe, Brown, etc., and look at how many states had already been desegregated, allowed sodomy, allowed abortions, contraception, etc. Originally Posted by Cosmic Charlie No
This is not true
This is incorrect
We have DOMA, don't we? You really are going to believe politicians are all of a sudden going to repeal DOMA, or for that matter, the Supreme Court is going to overrule what - to this day - a majority of states don't believe is a constitutional right? Originally Posted by Cosmic Charlie This is also incorrect.
While a fringe beleieved this most mainstrean objections to mixed marriage were based on bibical, thelolgical objections made my religious leaders of various type.
Please let me know where you are getting this from. This source needs to be exposed as fraudulent.
Fraudulent? What was segregation based off of? So these States were going to allow segregation but bat a blind eye at different races marrying one another?
Come on....
__________________ Tim Tebow: I'm a Christian.
Media: Keep it to yourself.
Jason Collins: I'm gay.
Media: This man's a hero!
-Yahoo User
|
12th September 2012, 11:51 PM
|  | Since 1958, we were deceived.
| | Join Date: 14th January 2006
Posts: 10,000
Blessings: 5,086,028
Reps: 1,026,590,660,785,224,192 (power: 1,026,590,660,785,242) | | | Alright: Is it or is not legitimate for a state to permit plural marriage or polygamy? If the claim is made, that they are all consent adults of the legal age (at least 18 years of age or older): would a marriage of a man and three wives be legally sanctioned or condoned? After all, the folks that practise such do claim that they 'love one another' and that they 'gave their free and willing consent'.
What would be the impediment? In a Liberal society, there is none. There is no line in the sand that dictates what is permitted and what is not. All that matters is 'consent' and that they 'love one another'; no matter the form of relationship or how bizarre it may appear to you and I.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
==============================
Kindly keep me in your rosary and prayer intentions; especially as I am looking for full-time employment . . .
“O God, be merciful to me a sinner.”
― St Luke XVIII, xiii.
-------------------------------------
I've left CF & no longer have access to this account.
If you wish to stay in touch, post your email in Reilly's.
As of now: I am locked out. |
13th September 2012, 09:55 PM
|  | I close my eyes and see you smile
| | Join Date: 11th April 2005
Posts: 54,681
Blessings: 86,643,570 My Mood 
Reps: 2,077,156,217,909,144,832 (power: 2,077,156,217,909,207) | | Originally Posted by Wolseley For some reason the movie Blade Runner just popped into my head.....
Cherry 2000.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Matthew Chapter 7 7 "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. 8 For everyone who asks, receives; and the one who seeks, finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened."
Urgent
Pray for your departed loved ones ~ even if you do not believe in purgatory - what harm can come from praying for them?
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
But I say, walk by the Spirit and you shall not fulfil the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
of the flesh. For the flesh
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
against the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
, and the Spirit against the flesh; for these are contrary the one to the other: that you may not do the things that you would. | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
