Home | Be a Christian | Devotionals | Join Us! | Forums | Rules | F.A.Q.


Go Back   Christian Forums > Theology (orthodox Christians only) > Theology (orthodox Christians only) > Christian History
Register BlogsPrayersJobsArcade Calendar Mark Forums Read

Christian History The forum to discuss the history of the Christian church.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 3rd September 2012, 04:10 PM
Junior Member

33 Gender: Male Faith: Anglican Party: UK-Greens Country: England Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 12th November 2006
Posts: 94
Blessings: 103,542
Reps: 31,361,994,570,201,048 (power: 31,361,994,570,209)
UKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond repute
UKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond reputeUKChristian has a reputation beyond repute
What denomination is closest to the early Christians?

Hello all.

I'm very new to Christian history or anything outside the Anglican Church really. I was just wondering what modern day denomination, in your opinion, is closest to the early Christians in terms of what they believed and how they worshipped. I know a lot of denominations, including my own, claim to be Apostolic but some of these are very different indeed.
Reply With Quote
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!

  #2  
Old 3rd September 2012, 06:48 PM
Albion's Avatar
Senior Contributor

Gender: Male Married Faith: Anglican Country: United States Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 8th December 2004
Posts: 44,127
Blessings: 83,368,177
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,854,830)
Albion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond repute
Albion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by UKChristian View Post
Hello all.

I'm very new to Christian history or anything outside the Anglican Church really. I was just wondering what modern day denomination, in your opinion, is closest to the early Christians in terms of what they believed and how they worshipped. I know a lot of denominations, including my own, claim to be Apostolic but some of these are very different indeed.
The one closest to the original would be liturgical but not overly showy, believe scripture to be our only sure guide, have clergy and sacraments, but not try to define all the things of God that we weren't given by him to know.

In short, it's the CofE or one of its close relatives such as the the Free Church of England or the Methodist church.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 3rd September 2012, 07:07 PM
Overseer

Gender: Male Married Faith: Non-Denominational Country: United States Member For 3 Years
 
Join Date: 9th October 2010
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,713
Blessings: 17,209,785
My Mood Blessed
Reps: 525,908,590,782,635,456 (power: 525,908,590,782,641)
1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute
1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute1watchman has a reputation beyond repute
I believe the most scriptural Christian fellowship in the world is that revival of AD 1827 in Ireland and then England. It has assemblies associated with it worldwide. One can read about the history and the ground of gathering as intended, I see, at www.biblecounsel.homestead.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 3rd September 2012, 07:51 PM
Radagast's Avatar
has left CF

Gender: Male Faith: Christian Country: Australia Member For 5 Years Fisherman
 
Join Date: 10th December 2003
Posts: 7,703
Blessings: 809,928
My Mood Praying
Reps: 555,078,284,124,515,136 (power: 555,078,284,124,533)
Radagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond repute
Radagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond reputeRadagast has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by UKChristian View Post
Hello all.

I'm very new to Christian history or anything outside the Anglican Church really. I was just wondering what modern day denomination, in your opinion, is closest to the early Christians in terms of what they believed and how they worshipped. I know a lot of denominations, including my own, claim to be Apostolic but some of these are very different indeed.


Obviously, everyone will reply "my denomination."
__________________
Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God (Colossians 3:16)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 4th September 2012, 12:44 PM
Knee V's Avatar
All ya gotska do is use the force!

32 Gender: Male Married Faith: Eastern-Orthodox Party: US-Libertarian Country: United States Member For 5 Years Fisherman
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 17th September 2003
Location: Grayson County, TX
Posts: 7,196
Blessings: 1,152,671
Blog Entries: 1
Reps: 1,850,071,625,311,764,480 (power: 1,850,071,625,311,782)
Knee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond repute
Knee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond reputeKnee V has a reputation beyond repute
Have you read any of the writings of the earliest Christians?
__________________
"Aslan," said Lucy, "you're bigger."
"That is because you are older, little one," answered he.
"Not because you are?"
"I am not. But every year you grow, you will find me bigger."



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 5th September 2012, 01:49 PM
Newbie

Gender: Male Married Faith: Mormon Member For 4 Years
 
Join Date: 31st March 2010
Posts: 636
Blessings: 32,589
Reps: 21,322,756,169,196,368 (power: 21,322,756,169,201)
Clearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond repute
Clearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond reputeClearly has a reputation beyond repute
This same basic OP question was beat to death in the prior thread named “Which denomination today is closest to 1st Century Christianity”. (That thread was closed because the posting became uncivil.)

Though I am not tempted to believe that the oldest schismatics today are “the original” Christianity, still, I do believe the various “old” christianities tend to have many wonderful historic echo’s and doctrinal “debri” from early christian themes. I also think a study of the oldest schisms from rome, Africa, “Byzantium”, etc, are wonderful sources for historians trying to understand HOW certain doctrines were created, changed and how some were lost.



1) A Loss of prophetic leadership

I do not think that doctrinal accretions and evolutionary changes to the earliest doctrines was completely unavoidable. For example, once the last authentic apostle, John the revelator, died, then, all congregations such as Antioch, Rome, Jerusalem, Galatia, ephesus (and others not mentioned in NT texts...) were in the position of having no living source of apostolic authority nor prophetic revelatory guidance such authentic leaders [αποστολοι, etc.] had provided in the fledgling Jesus movement.



2) Early Doctrinal Immaturity of the Jesus Movement

Once the early congregations were "on their own" to make their own way as best they could without revelatory leadership it was inevitable that all would tend to stray in differing doctrinal directions.

Origen pointed out that the Christianity of his age had not yet decided whether God the Father had a physical body or not. Such a doctrinal “immaturity” was a difficult situation since many other types of doctrinal details were not spelled out for the christian movement which was coming under increasing pressure for answers to such questions from honest investigators and their antagonists alike.



3) Christianity attempting to better define itself

This lack of answers to simple doctrinal questions led to many early arguments and to a proliferation of multiple theories and further schisms were not unexpected. The ancient arguments over doctrines often reminds me of the very, very similar arguments we all see in modern religious and philosophical forums.



4) "Theologian derived religion" versus "Prophetic and Apostolic transmitted religion"

Various theologians attempted to fill the doctrinal gap left by the death of Apostles and Prophets. Though I believe many of these theologians were doing their very best to generate answers and theories and doctrines based on their best guesses and logic, I believe that “ theologian-derived” religion was inferior to “Prophet-transmitted” religion that had existed in the early Jesus movement.

Some theories of the Theologians became more popular than other theories and took on the mantle of “orthodoxy”. It was a situation of later ecclesiastics and theologians attempting to "make do" and “feel their way in the dark” to a certain extent. It was the best they could do, given their circumstances.

I believe many early theologians' motives involved an honest and good desire to protect and "further christian aims” as they generated ever more theories to fill the early gaps in knowledge though I am sure that ego and pride contaminated many of the early arguments over what was to be taught as “orthodoxy” .

The resulting doctrinal accretions and evolutions away from early simple doctrines are a study in the difference between the often well-intentioned theologians and the authentic inspirations of apostles.



5) The resulting doctrinal evolutions that resulted in multiple Christian Movements

Given a proliferation of various but specific systems of beliefs, it makes perfect sense historically, that doctrines would undergo evolutions.

a) Some simple, core doctrines would be kept perfectly intact
b) Some doctrines would evolve away from early versions (but still present in some form)
c) New Doctrines and practices would appear
d) Some early Judao-Christian doctrines would be abandoned and ultimately lost



6) The role of historical principles in answering the Opening Posts question

To answer the question regarding which modern Christian movement is most similar to the earliest Christian movement, one must FIRST define what the earliest Christian movement was like (else, there is no valid comparison.)

Legitimate and authentic history attempts to answer the questions regarding what early Judao-Christianity might have looked like; what its doctrines may have been; and what its authentic practices were and the meaning and purposes underlying those practices.

Modern religious historians are not simply left to arbitrary and modern interpretations of a few memorized biblical verses in a manner batted about in many of the arguments we see between christians arguing for their myriads of competing interpretations. There is a vast amount of early Judao-christian sacred and secular texts available to us. One can learn about what the early Judao-Christianities believed and what their beliefs and practices looked like by reading early Mishnas, early psalms/odes, early Christian Synagogal prayers, early christian diaries, the earliest discourses, early canonical texts that are no longer included in modern (or western) texts; epigrapha, etc, etc. This situation continues to improve.



7) A THEORETICAL "CUT AND PASTE" OF THE FIRST CHRISTIANITY IN THE TIME OF APOSTLES


a) Earliest Form of Organization – apostles, prophets, bishops, elders, etc.

A hypthetical denomination that would be closest to first century Christianity would be (in my opinion) a "cut and paste" of the earliest church into our era. That is, to “cut” the 12 apostles and early prophets (with their on-going revelations) out of the first century and “paste” that sort of organization into our modern era.


b) Earliest forms of Christian Doctrine, earliest definitions of faith, baptism, etc

“Cut” the earliest doctrines regarding Gods plan for the spirits of mankind out of the earliest Judao-christian texts and “paste” those doctrines into this hypothetical denomination. “Cut” the earliest doctrines regarding Faith in Jesus, repentance, baptism, gifts of the spirit among their leaders and among the laity and “paste” them into this hypthetical denomination.


c) Earliest forms of Practices

“Cut” the earliest descriptions of Baptism, of ordination, of healing and miracles out of the early descriptions of Judao-Christianity and “paste” them into this congregation.


d) Ability to use the earliest texts of Judao Christianity

I think that knee-v (in the prior post), makes an interesting point regarding the earliest Judao-christian writings)

I have come to believe that a hypothetical modern Christian movement that resembles the 1st century Christianity will be mostly oriented to, comfortable with and able to use the greatest amount of the earliest texts in demonstrating their teachings while those less like the earliest Judao-Christians will find the earliest texts disorienting and inconsistent with their doctrines (and will thus be dismissive of the earliest texts and perhaps call the early Christians and their writings, "heretical").

If one “cut and pasted” early Texts into the midst of this movement, they should be able to make better and more comfortable use of such texts than the denominations to which early Judao-Christin principles would be completely foreign.

I think that, to discuss "which denomination" is most like the earliest christian movement, one will have to break the question down into discrete and specific comparisons such how close its organization is to the earliest descriptions of Christian organization, how close its doctrines of salvation are to those of earliest christianity (e.g. faith, repentance, baptism, gifts of the spirit; fruits of conversion, etc.), how close its practices are to the earliest Judao-Christians (baptism, eucharistic meal, etc), and how seamless the earliest Judao-Christian texts reflect and could be used by this hypothetical denomination.


Clearly

actzrr

Last edited by Clearly; 6th September 2012 at 12:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 7th September 2012, 03:35 PM
When do I stop being a Newbie?

Gender: Female Married Faith: Christian Party: US-Democrat Country: United States Member For 2 Years
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 17th July 2012
Location: Right Here
Posts: 886
Blessings: 1,221,035
Reps: 132,211,973,184,117,248 (power: 132,211,973,184,120)
ZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond repute
ZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond reputeZaidaBoBaida has a reputation beyond repute
MY denomination is closest to the early church of course! *rolls eyes*
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 7th September 2012, 04:03 PM
Albion's Avatar
Senior Contributor

Gender: Male Married Faith: Anglican Country: United States Member For 5 Years
 
Join Date: 8th December 2004
Posts: 44,127
Blessings: 83,368,177
Reps: 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 (power: 9,223,372,036,854,830)
Albion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond repute
Albion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond reputeAlbion has a reputation beyond repute
The question can, actually, be answered with facts. However, the answer is almost always going to be (one's own church) because who would conclude that it's another denomination...but refuse to join that one.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 7th September 2012, 05:30 PM
ViaCrucis's Avatar
Wittenberg Catholic

Gender: Male Faith: Lutheran Party: US-Green Country: United Nations Member For 2 Years
 
Join Date: 2nd October 2011
Posts: 10,205
Blessings: 22,647,354
Reps: 2,140,559,305,057,378,816 (power: 2,140,559,305,057,391)
ViaCrucis has disabled reputation
Originally Posted by UKChristian View Post
Hello all.

I'm very new to Christian history or anything outside the Anglican Church really. I was just wondering what modern day denomination, in your opinion, is closest to the early Christians in terms of what they believed and how they worshipped. I know a lot of denominations, including my own, claim to be Apostolic but some of these are very different indeed.
I don't believe such exists, it's impossible to recreate the unique conditions that existed in the earliest period of Christianity. The apostolic period was unique, as was the patristic period that followed.

The Church adapted and developed accordingly to meet the needs of an ever-shifting historical climate without ever forsaking its principal calling and the substance of its confession. That is, the Church has always been the Church, and Christianity has always been Christianity.

The numerous schisms that have taken place over the centuries (since the 5th century with the Nestorian and Miaphysite schisms) have been unfortunate obviously, but I don't believe it right to say that any one modern church tradition is everything as it was in the first century. That's simply unrealistic gas.

I'm Lutheran, and I'm Lutheran because I believe Lutheranism is exceptionally biblical; but it would be insane to claim that the Apostles and Fathers were Lutherans. I believe Lutheranism captures the heart and spirit of the Apostolic and Patristic Faith, but obviously others disagree--hence our many and varied divisions.

There is no such thing as a perfect church, and modern romantic notions of Primitivism are neither realistic, healthy, nor good--ultimately amounting to anachronistically forcing modern perspectives onto our spiritual fore-fathers and fore-mothers of two thousand years ago.

-CryptoLutheran
__________________
Simul iustus et peccator.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 7th September 2012, 06:15 PM
Mr Dave's Avatar
God Save The Queen!

24 Gender: Male Faith: Methodist Country: United Kingdom Member For 4 Years Fisherman
View Profile Pic
 
Join Date: 2nd April 2010
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 7,255
Blessings: 405,667,755
My Mood Cool
Reps: 4,282,638,097,707,996,672 (power: 4,282,638,097,708,008)
Mr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond repute
Mr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond reputeMr Dave has a reputation beyond repute
Syriac Orthodox Church - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Return to Christian History

Thread Tools
Display Modes


 
Become a CF Site Supporter Today and Make These Ads Go Away!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.