The Twin Towers and Building 7 disappeared in a matter of seconds, from 10 to 14 seconds. That is about how long it would take a bowling ball or a wrecking ball to reach the ground if dropped from the top of the towers, called free-fall speed. Nothing can fall faster than free-fall speed and to reach that speed an object must be falling through thin air, with nothing between it and the ground (such as 95,000 tons of structural steel. ) Nothing can attain anything even close to free-fall speed through anything but thin air.
The steel frames would have to be cut and blown out in pieces at an accelerated rate from the top down, in the cases of the Twin Towers, so that the pieces are not meeting any resistance and are literally falling through thin air. This is a basic law of physics which tells us it was a demolition.
Free-fall speed is the same no matter what the weight of a falling mass. Galileo proved this. Free-fall speed is an acceleration of 10 meters per second, per second. This means for every second an object is falling it gains another ten meters per second in speed. So if an object is falling for three seconds, its speed at the end of three seconds is 30 meters per second.
Here is a demonstration of Galileo's theory that heavier objects do not fall faster than lighter objects, but that they fall at the same speed.
The common misconception is that as the mass of "collapsing floors" accumulated, the mass accelerated. But mass does not accelerate as it gets heavier. The official story plays on a misconception which goes back, literally, to the days of Flat Earth. Mass can only go slower than free-fall speed, never faster. The resistance of 95,000 tons of structural steel, even if it were weakened, would have slowed and arrested the fall of any partial collapses.
Looked at another way, look at the picture below. If released at the same time, which 15-story block will hit the ground first, no matter how "soft like clay" the steel may be from fires, a favorite phrase of official story defenders? Obviously the one on the right should hit the ground first:
But surprise! On 9/11 both hit the ground at virtually the same time! The block on the left dropped as fast as if it were the block on the right! This only happens in demolitions in which all structural supports are cut out at the same time.
In the video record of 9/11 you can see this happening, the structural steel being cut to pieces as the line of demolition accelerates downward. You see clean-cut steel beams being ejected laterally, for up to two football fields, at speeds of up to 80MPH. In a satellite photo taken just 12 days after the attacks, before clean-up had begun and the search for bodies and long-shot survivors was still ongoing, you can see the clean-cut steel beams laying like a thick carpet across the entire WTC complex.
All these little toothpick like objects you see spinning out at explosive speeds are multi-ton pieces of steel:
Another view:
The straight "sticks" you see lying across the WTC complex are 3, 4 and 5- foot wide steel beams each weighing many tons. How did the below piece of perimeter wall get all the way to Church Street?
The demolition was called a "banana-peel" style demolition like below. Compare the patterns, streamers of debris arcing outward. This style, top-down, is used for tall buildings where tipping is a danger if it were done from bottom to top (traditional).
So you started another Truther thread because you didn't like the responses on the other thread, LOL?
The "Plausible Theory" website does a nice job of combining and rehashing old information and speculation. There are, of course many gaps and the fanciful tale of painting thermite on beams inside walls and how the thousands of people involved have been able to stay quiet for over ten years.
Somebody should make a movie. MI: 9/11, starring Tom Cruise.
__________________
I read in the newspapers they are going to have 30 minutes of intellectual stuff on television every Monday from 7:30 to 8. to educate America. They couldn't educate America if they started at 6:30.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Love conspiracy theories. Though they tend to be, without exception, pure nonsense with no valid evidence to back them up, it IS interesting to see what other people's beliefs are.
The 9/11 conspiracy theory is one of the most interesting of the lot. Granted, it has such poor evidence and reasoning as to not be taken seriously, but it is fascinating to read what people come up with in their spare time. The human imagination is a wonderful thing.
__________________ “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick... For I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”- Matthew 9
I read in the newspapers they are going to have 30 minutes of intellectual stuff on television every Monday from 7:30 to 8. to educate America. They couldn't educate America if they started at 6:30.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I used to think free-fall was the easiest-to-understand proof of demolition, but actually it gets even easier than that: photo evidence. It's right there on Youtube, plain as day. The BBC is reporting that Building 7 (which was never struck by an airplane, by the way...) collapsed, and yet there is Building 7, standing right there behind her. And then 20 minutes later, it collapses. If you wanna talk about conspiracy lunacy, how about then we talk about the BBC's amazing sense of ESP? So good, in fact, that they even report premonitions of the near future by accident!
I don't know how it can get any clearer than that.
I used to think free-fall was the easiest-to-understand proof of demolition, but actually it gets even easier than that: photo evidence. It's right there on Youtube, plain as day. The BBC is reporting that Building 7 (which was never struck by an airplane, by the way...) collapsed, and yet there is Building 7, standing right there behind her. And then 20 minutes later, it collapses. If you wanna talk about conspiracy lunacy, how about then we talk about the BBC's amazing sense of ESP? So good, in fact, that they even report premonitions of the near future by accident!
I don't know how it can get any clearer than that.
And how those American networks had studios in New york on the air that day. And how they just happpened to have cameras trained on the second Tower when the second "plane" struck it.
__________________
I read in the newspapers they are going to have 30 minutes of intellectual stuff on television every Monday from 7:30 to 8. to educate America. They couldn't educate America if they started at 6:30.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
And how those American networks had studios in New york on the air that day. And how they just happpened to have cameras trained on the second Tower when the second "plane" struck it.
What does that have to do with BBC News and WTC? The reporter announced, reporting LIVE and ON LOCATION that WTC had gone down while it was standing right behind her. She jumped the gun by 26 minutes.
I don't think this is the strongest evidence since the disinformation artists will always make up something ludicrous to try to explain it away (or deliberately misunderstand it like in the comment above.) What cannot be finessed is the laws of physics.
The BBC flub is just one of many that can be seen, no crime this elaborate can be perfect. Like the WTC landlord Larry Silverstein telling the news reporter he told them to "pull" i.e. demolish the building. The disinfos are trained to say he meant pull the firefighters, but they had been pulled out 4 hours before.
Silverstein "pull" it:
Or Rudy Giuliani letting it slip to Peter Jennings that he had been tipped tipped off that the South Tower was going to collapse, the first one to do so. Who told him? Why didn't he tell anyone else but instead tucked tail and ran up Vessey Street, as the firefighters say? So many lives could have been saved.
The news clip right there, on the ticker,, plain as day: "Solomon Brothers building collapses". And yet the building remains standing, right there behind the reporter. It even collapses right there on the TV screen after the ticker has already reported it!!
And the crowd goes silent.... It's just a hmmm...well....
Linear Mode
