It's part of the natural historic temperature swing of the earth. It's very likely that human CO2 release has pushed the normal cycle faster and harder than normal. But there has always been a global temp swing.
As you can see on the far right, we are still below the normal high spike. It may go even higher than any other spike.
I have a space heater in my sons room going right now. In China some kids huddled together right now because they have no heater in their house. I'm not going to deny them a heater. And we could all stand to have better employment in the world. Likely the global recession is due to uncertainty due to global warming panic.
Temperatures haven't increased beyond the highs we've seen in the past 400,000 years, but CO2 has which may lead to breakout temps.
__________________ "When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said 'Let us pray.' We closed our eyes. When we opened them, we had the Bible and they had the land."
-Archbishop Desmond Tutu
"The fables of so called science are gross darkness and evil."
-God's One True Prophet on Earth, dad
"Creationists can't all be right but they can all be wrong."
-Frumious Bandersnatch
Temperatures haven't increased beyond the highs we've seen in the past 400,000 years, but CO2 has which may lead to breakout temps.
I agree completely. But the temps are still 5 degrees short of historic maximums for a normal swing. I agree, we can expect even higher temps this cycle. The point being that we are not preparing for the normal historic high temps. "They" are trying to brainwash us into thinking if we just eliminate all fossil fuel use we can stop the inevitable. I'm trying to get the word out, that we need to get busy and prepare for some real heat problems. Not to wok to shut down the global economy in a wasted effort to stop climate change. That's asking the rest of the world to stop developing. A pretty heartless stand to take while we text and drive at the same time as eating fast food kept in the food cooler of the SUV.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Believe Him or Not!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by SkyWriting; 4th November 2012 at 07:51 AM.
I agree completely. But the temps are still 5 degrees short of historic maximums for a normal swing. I agree, we can expect even higher temps this cycle. The point being that we are not preparing for the normal historic high temps. "They" are trying to brainwash us into thinking if we just eliminate all fossil fuel use we can stop the inevitable. I'm trying to get the word out, that we need to get busy and prepare for some real heat problems. Not to wok to shut down the global economy in a wasted effort to stop climate change. That's asking the rest of the world to stop developing. A pretty heartless stand to take while we text and drive at the same time as eating fast food kept in the food cooler of the SUV.
Dr. Chaim Tejman asserts that plants are the key to stabilization of climate. His idea seems to agree with Isaiah chapter 35.
Our environment is obviously undergoing major changes, and I believe that trees have a vital role in the atmospheric balance. Trees possess the ability to absorb much of the incoming energy. Gradually, trees that have absorbed energy submerge beneath the ground and turn into coal. Mankind is presently consuming unprecedented amounts of energy. Instead of storing the energy, like nature, we are releasing it into the atmosphere. Therefore, an international effort must be made to stop cutting down trees and to plant as many more as possible.
Its not as bad as that. One research team documented an increase of biomass of 300% in two years in the 100square feet they monitored.
In other words, the plants will thrive without human effort.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Believe Him or Not!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Its not as bad as that. One research team documented an increase of biomass of 300% in two years in the 100square feet they monitored.
In other words, the plants will thrive without human effort.
The real problem is that climatic zones are changing. Agricultural areas will not be able to move with them due to urbanization. And what about changing global watersheds?
The real problem is that climatic zones are changing. Agricultural areas will not be able to move with them due to urbanization. And what about changing global watersheds?
Historically climate change is nothing new. We're going need huge amounts of energy to adapt to the changes, and move populations. Likely more energy than what has ever been used up till now. It's the left that is being far, far too conservative about CHANGE. Here's an opportunity to globalize government and call for a rebuilding of society from the ground up in new locations worldwide, with planned cities and government services and everything. And they're calling for solar & wind power. Winds will be shifting to new patterns, becoming more erratic and as temps increase cloud cover will increase. As the paper mentions.
I'm not saying I'm for global government. Just that the left is missing their golden opportunity and whining for conservation. Oddly.
We are more likely to get the population of Asia excited
about finding more sources of energy to use to build new cities.
Less likely to get them excited about shutting down all their industrial
growth and hunkering down with windmills and solar panels
and watching J.R. Ewing on their mini ipads.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Believe Him or Not!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by SkyWriting; 11th November 2012 at 08:03 AM.
Its not as bad as that. One research team documented an increase of biomass of 300% in two years in the 100square feet they monitored.
In other words, the plants will thrive without human effort.
Interesting!
Part of the reason for this is that plants, up to a point, love the extra atmospheric CO2!
Linear Mode
