| Ethics & Morality A forum for the discussion and debate of ethics & morality open to all members. |  | | 
16th July 2012, 03:16 PM
| | Senior Veteran
 | | Join Date: 4th April 2012
Posts: 2,839
Blessings: 13,740
Reps: 100,609,197,234,398,480 (power: 0) | | | Considering that ~70% of conceptions fail, I want to hear what Stoneghost thinks happens to the overwhelming number of souls who never even make it to clinical pregnancy.
Sent from my iPhone using Forum Runner | 
16th July 2012, 08:43 PM
|  | Rising Force 29 
| | Join Date: 4th September 2005 Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,354
Blessings: 13,624,908 My Mood
Reps: 423,288,690,875,867,584 (power: 423,288,690,875,880) | | | I don't think anyone has a "soul". I put that in the same classification as other religious dogma.
I don't oppose it for any religious or spiritual reasons (obviously)...I don't even oppose all of it.
I'm even completely okay with it for cases of rape or when the mother's health is in danger.
I even understand it for cases when birth control is used correctly but fails due to a fluke.
According to the CDC, here is the breakdown of reasons:
Rape/Incest < 1%
Health Risk 3%
Contraception Failure 16%
(These...I'm completely okay with and understand)
What I don't support is irresponsibility and poor planning.
Not Using Contraception 46%
Changed her mind 8%
Can't afford 23%
There were about 13 other reasons listed that made up the remaining 3%, but those reasons were so vaguely worded that I couldn't make a judgment call one way or the other.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. dir="ltr"> With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things and evil people to do good things, that takes religion. | 
16th July 2012, 09:55 PM
|  | Liberty, Equality, Solidarity! 22  | | Join Date: 16th September 2011
Posts: 5,002
Blessings: 36,050,767
Reps: 98,344,133,562,165,328 (power: 98,344,133,562,172) | | Originally Posted by miniverchivi What I don't support is irresponsibility and poor planning.
Not Using Contraception 46%
Changed her mind 8%
Can't afford 23%
I just realise that people (in general) are silly, have instincts, and make mistakes. People make mistakes all the time and I don't see why on this special occasion we penalise them for it. Recently I tried to pay for something and I had literally no money on me at all. I have no idea why I thought I could pay for it. Its not as if people choose to do something stupid, they just do it.
I can quite imagine that sometimes humans miscalculate risk and danger or even forget about it all together. Are they being purposely irresponsible or just human. Are their brains just not in logic mode.
I just have a problem with thinking we are naturally rational and responsible creatures and if we don't act that way we are broken. Of course we should aim towards our ideals, but it is more true to accept that we are naturally fallible and weak. People have strengths and weaknesses in different areas as well. To think humans are capable of perfect responsibility seems to view them as semi-divine, as if we work by different rules than animals. If we aren't capable of perfect responsibility then we can't necessarily be blamed for our lack of it.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"I wonder if I've been changed in the night? Let me think. Was I the same when I got up this morning? I almost think I can remember feeling a little different. But if I'm not the same, the next question is 'Who in the world am I?' Ah, that's the great puzzle!" | 
16th July 2012, 11:08 PM
|  | Rising Force 29 
| | Join Date: 4th September 2005 Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,354
Blessings: 13,624,908 My Mood
Reps: 423,288,690,875,867,584 (power: 423,288,690,875,880) | | Originally Posted by Paradoxum I just realise that people (in general) are silly, have instincts, and make mistakes. People make mistakes all the time and I don't see why on this special occasion we penalise them for it. Recently I tried to pay for something and I had literally no money on me at all. I have no idea why I thought I could pay for it. Its not as if people choose to do something stupid, they just do it.
I can quite imagine that sometimes humans miscalculate risk and danger or even forget about it all together. Are they being purposely irresponsible or just human. Are their brains just not in logic mode.
I just have a problem with thinking we are naturally rational and responsible creatures and if we don't act that way we are broken. Of course we should aim towards our ideals, but it is more true to accept that we are naturally fallible and weak. People have strengths and weaknesses in different areas as well. To think humans are capable of perfect responsibility seems to view them as semi-divine, as if we work by different rules than animals. If we aren't capable of perfect responsibility then we can't necessarily be blamed for our lack of it.
I understand that people are going to make mistakes, but I don't think there's an excuse for this case. Everyone I know was taught in the 6th grade (and every year after that in school) that if you have sex and don't use protection, you could have an unplanned pregnancy. I don't think it takes perfect responsibility to know that if you plan on engaging in regular sexual activity that you need to take precautions. There's a multitude of other risks other than pregnancy that goes along with having unprotected sex as well (some of which there are no easy-outs for like HIV).
There are certain things that don't take deep logical thinking to figure out, some things are just common sense. This isn't a "special occasion", people face consequences for their mistakes all of the time. For example, if you rob a bank, that's definitely a mistake, but I hardly think that the "I just wasn't thinking rationally for that split second" defense would hold up in court and get you off the hook.
As another poster mentioned, only ~30% of conceptions take. Statistically, that would mean that some of these people in the "Didn't use protection" category would've had unprotected sex multiple times before a pregnancy actually occured. If you have unprotected sex 4 times and get pregnant, the "I didn't know this was going to happen" defense doesn't hold water.
If you're going to have sex and don't want a kid: Guys, go the drug store, spend $3, and get some rubbers. Ladies, get on the pill. With the last girl I dated, we used both just to be doubly safe and split the costs.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. dir="ltr"> With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things and evil people to do good things, that takes religion. | 
16th July 2012, 11:16 PM
| | Senior Member 18 
| | Join Date: 16th July 2012 Location: Caribbean
Posts: 748
Blessings: 1,008,265 My Mood
Reps: 167,454,956,808,008,480 (power: 0) | | | I'm pro-life since I consider that life is created at the moment of conception. And to terminate that life would be basically terminating a human being. In the Bible, many verses when referring to various women say "she conceived a son" or "she conceived twins" (as in the case with Esau and Jacob). I don't think it would have been ok to remove the fetuses in the womb even directly after the moment of conception. In the Bible, when conception occurred, the child was already considered a human being no matter how many cells were present. | 
16th July 2012, 11:30 PM
| | Unscrewer of the Inscrutable
 | | Join Date: 1st December 2011
Posts: 1,872
Blessings: 2,256 My Mood
Reps: 48,631,479,443,142,656 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by KimberlyAA I'm pro-life since I consider that life is created at the moment of conception. And to terminate that life would be basically terminating a human being. In the Bible, many verses when referring to various women say "she conceived a son" or "she conceived twins" (as in the case with Esau and Jacob). I don't think it would have been ok to remove the fetuses in the womb even directly after the moment of conception. In the Bible, when conception occurred, the child was already considered a human being no matter how many cells were present.
If souls are attached at conception what becomes of the majority that will never come full term? | 
17th July 2012, 02:28 AM
| | Newbie
 | | Join Date: 24th March 2010
Posts: 107
Blessings: 57,955
Reps: 210,418,154,888,337 (power: 210,418,154,892) | | Originally Posted by Trogool Considering that ~70% of conceptions fail, I want to hear what Stoneghost thinks happens to the overwhelming number of souls who never even make it to clinical pregnancy.
Don't you see that thing by my name indicating I'm self identifying as an agnostic? What do you think I think happens to the souls? Nothing because I don't believe in souls. I don't believe that a zygote is a human being. You're the Christian here, you tell me what happens to the souls of the failed pregnancies in your religion. You tell me what you think happens and you tell me what your religion tells you what happens. | 
17th July 2012, 09:42 AM
|  | Liberty, Equality, Solidarity! 22  | | Join Date: 16th September 2011
Posts: 5,002
Blessings: 36,050,767
Reps: 98,344,133,562,165,328 (power: 98,344,133,562,172) | | Originally Posted by miniverchivi I understand that people are going to make mistakes, but I don't think there's an excuse for this case. Everyone I know was taught in the 6th grade (and every year after that in school) that if you have sex and don't use protection, you could have an unplanned pregnancy. I don't think it takes perfect responsibility to know that if you plan on engaging in regular sexual activity that you need to take precautions. There's a multitude of other risks other than pregnancy that goes along with having unprotected sex as well (some of which there are no easy-outs for like HIV).
You mention regular sexual activity, so would you be ok with abortion if it is the product of a one night stand?
I know everyone knows that you need contraception, but that doesn't mean that thought has the full power it should have in the moment. I also know that I have to indicate when going round a roundabout, but nevertheless in my first test I didn't because I was stressed. You can say that I shouldn't be stressed but I can't really help that.
It doesn't take perfect responsibility to know what to do when you are sitting at home, but it does take perfect responsibility to always recall and act on what you know in times of calm thought. There are certain things that don't take deep logical thinking to figure out, some things are just common sense. This isn't a "special occasion", people face consequences for their mistakes all of the time. For example, if you rob a bank, that's definitely a mistake, but I hardly think that the "I just wasn't thinking rationally for that split second" defense would hold up in court and get you off the hook.
There are so many factors that are different in a bank robbery and so much detail left out that I don't find it possible to compare the two. I agree that some things don't need deep logical thinking to figure out, but people get those things wrong all the time. Even if you set it out simply in front of someone, if they are in an emotional state they might just not listen. Again, human nature isn't semi-divine. We fail often for no good reason. As another poster mentioned, only ~30% of conceptions take. Statistically, that would mean that some of these people in the "Didn't use protection" category would've had unprotected sex multiple times before a pregnancy actually occured. If you have unprotected sex 4 times and get pregnant, the "I didn't know this was going to happen" defense doesn't hold water.
To be honest I have been mostly focused on one night stands. I agree that it is very stupid to not use contraception in a long term relationship, so the question to ask is, why do they do it? If it is so obvious why does it happen so much? Are they just bad people? If you're going to have sex and don't want a kid: Guys, go the drug store, spend $3, and get some rubbers. Ladies, get on the pill. With the last girl I dated, we used both just to be doubly safe and split the costs.
I totally agree, I just don't like to condemn people for their human nature.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"I wonder if I've been changed in the night? Let me think. Was I the same when I got up this morning? I almost think I can remember feeling a little different. But if I'm not the same, the next question is 'Who in the world am I?' Ah, that's the great puzzle!" | 
17th July 2012, 10:52 AM
|  | Rising Force 29 
| | Join Date: 4th September 2005 Location: Ohio
Posts: 5,354
Blessings: 13,624,908 My Mood
Reps: 423,288,690,875,867,584 (power: 423,288,690,875,880) | | Originally Posted by Paradoxum You mention regular sexual activity, so would you be ok with abortion if it is the product of a one night stand?
It doesn't take perfect responsibility to know what to do when you are sitting at home, but it does take perfect responsibility to always recall and act on what you know in times of calm thought.
To be honest I have been mostly focused on one night stands. I agree that it is very stupid to not use contraception in a long term relationship, so the question to ask is, why do they do it? If it is so obvious why does it happen so much? Are they just bad people?
I totally agree, I just don't like to condemn people for their human nature.
Even for cases of one night stands, it's still the product of poor planning. Sure, decision making in the heat of the moment isn't as clear as when you're sitting at home...but preparation should be happening before you even get to the heat of the moment.
When I was in college and I knew I would be going to a party where that could happen (granted I've only done the one night stand thing twice in my whole life), I would always have protection in the flap of my wallet just in case.
I'm not expecting people to make that decision in the heat of the moment, I'm expecting them to prepare the preventative measures long before that moment even arrives.
To be completely honest, I think you're over estimating the mind altering power of human hormones. I can't speak for anyone else, but I've never been so overcome by the moment that I completely lose all logic.
I realize that in some cases for people alcohol is a factor, but again, that's another case where personal responsibility is key.
To your other question, I don't know if they're "bad people", I would just consider them irresponsible people. I have a family member who's had 2 abortions. In a relationship, and not using protection. The reason she gave was that it was an unexpected pregancy. I don't see how a person who's been doing it for 4 months can call it unexpected. That would be like a person jumping off the roof of their house and saying that they weren't expecting to break their ankle.
__________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. dir="ltr"> With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things and evil people to do good things, that takes religion. |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | | |