Has it been dis-proven that she doesn't have the Cherokee heritage?
Well, maybe if we had a non-partisan geneologist who wasn't out to support Scott Brown, say someone who is openly left-leaning and voted for Obama, and if said person did some research and could prove she had---oh, wait.
Or perhaps it's much like your claim that Romney is not tackling the EO that Obama just signed because he's staying "on point" with the economy.
Pssst. Wrong thread.
Can it be proved that I don't have Norwegian blood in my family?
I don't know, I'd have to ask someone who was good with tracking family trees. Maybe you should ask Ms. Barnes to look it up for you.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Click the image for the collection. Latest card(s): Tom Coburn, Godwin's Law (L) and Godwin's Law (D)
Quite true if one is looking to continue the left's assault on those who work for what they have.
It's a matter of perspective Red. I see an assault from the right on this country's middle class for the sole benefit of the pocketbooks of those who already have much more than they need.
It's a matter of perspective Red. I see an assault from the right on this country's middle class for the sole benefit of the pocketbooks of those who already have much more than they need.
1) Who do you want to determine how much everyone needs?
2) What's to stop those who accumulate "much more than they need" from going John Galt and just stopping to accumulate anything more, live on what they have and what they can now claim from other?
3) If #2 happened, where would those not accumulating what they need take from in order to get had what "they need"?
1) Who do you want to determine how much everyone needs?
2) What's to stop those who accumulate "much more than they need" from going John Galt and just stopping to accumulate anything more, live on what they have and what they can now claim from other?
3) If #2 happened, where would those not accumulating what they need take from in order to get had what "they need"?
Do you deny that America's middle class is being squeezed, many times even into poverty? Do you deny that the middle class took the biggest hit in the mortgage crisis and because of that has lost a great deal of what they were worth? Do you deny that the wages of the middle class, that once were more than adequate, now do not purchase anywhere near what they once did?
How can you cry about an assault against those who "work for what they have" when it is not the "left" that is attacking but instead the banks and financial institutions who are reaping the profits? Or do you hold that the banks are leftist institutions?
You raise some very good question that I am eager to discuss with you, but you failed to address even 1 of the 3 questions posed to you. A discussion involves answering questions as well as asking them.
) or income sources or home value.
Linear Mode
