Creation & EvolutionForum for the discussion of this important topic. This forum is open to non-believers. There is a Christians-only forum in the Christians-only section too.
'Evolution' refers to both the fact of evolution (a change in allele frequency over time) and the theory of evolution (the theory that all life is descended from a common ancestor, and variation is due to evolution by natural selection).
So, with that established, what's the best evidence or rationale against one or both?
__________________ I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right.
Stargate: SG1
A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone.
Charles Darwin
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Christopher Hitchens
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. .
'Evolution' refers to both the fact of evolution (a change in allele frequency over time) and the theory of evolution (the theory that all life is descended from a common ancestor, and variation is due to evolution by natural selection).
So, with that established, what's the best evidence or rationale against one or both?
'Evolution' refers to both the fact of evolution (a change in allele frequency over time) and the theory of evolution (the theory that all life is descended from a common ancestor, and variation is due to evolution by natural selection).
So, with that established, what's the best evidence or rationale against one or both?
I don't know that it counts as evidence against, and it's probably only a bit of nitpicking of your phrasing, but I thought this study on UCA was interesting ... or should I say the criticisms of this study, which came later around post #59.
Originally Posted by Naraoia
There was also a recent attempt at an explicit test of universal common ancestry, and this sparked debate, not automatic acceptance.
'Evolution' refers to both the fact of evolution (a change in allele frequency over time) and the theory of evolution (the theory that all life is descended from a common ancestor, and variation is due to evolution by natural selection).
So, with that established, what's the best evidence or rationale against one or both?
1. My religious dogma demands I reject evolutionism.
2. Evolutionism makes me feel all "icky" inside. I prefer "warm and fuzzy."
__________________ "When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said 'Let us pray.' We closed our eyes. When we opened them, we had the Bible and they had the land."
-Archbishop Desmond Tutu
"The fables of so called science are gross darkness and evil."
-God's One True Prophet on Earth, dad
"Creationists can't all be right but they can all be wrong."
-Frumious Bandersnatch
'Evolution' refers to both the fact of evolution (a change in allele frequency over time) and the theory of evolution (the theory that all life is descended from a common ancestor, and variation is due to evolution by natural selection).
So, with that established, what's the best evidence or rationale against one or both?
Anyone for the Nobel Prize and fame? NO Oh well ToE it is then
__________________
It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll.
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
'Evolution' refers to both the fact of evolution (a change in allele frequency over time) and the theory of evolution (the theory that all life is descended from a common ancestor, and variation is due to evolution by natural selection).
So, with that established, what's the best evidence or rationale against one or both?
You cannot use evolution to define evolution.
No "...and variation is due to evolution by natural selection" its not.
Can't you evolutionists do this correcting?
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Believe Him or Not!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
You cannot use evolution to define evolution.
No "...and variation is due to evolution by natural selection" its not.
Can't you evolutionists do this correcting?
If you got stuck at the first hurdle, maybe this race isn't for you. Thanks for trying, though!
__________________ I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right.
Stargate: SG1
A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone.
Charles Darwin
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Christopher Hitchens
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. .
Anyone for the Nobel Prize and fame? NO Oh well ToE it is then
Even if what you agreed to is incorrect?
Evolution does not cause variation.
Variation allows for changes to happen.
Evolution is the end result of the natural selection process.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Believe Him or Not!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
If you got stuck at the first hurdle, maybe this race isn't for you. Thanks for trying, though!
Do I stop when the logic is wrong. Yes....that's a wall. Logic is no hurdle to jump unless your a new student of natural sciences.
You can't use a word to define itself. Don't bother trying.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Believe Him or Not!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Do I stop when the logic is wrong. Yes....that's a wall. Logic is no hurdle to jump unless your a new student of natural sciences.
You can't use a word to define itself. Don't bother trying.
Oooh, still struggling with that first hurdle. Keep at it, you'll get it eventually. Thanks for playing!
__________________ I am a scientist... when I find evidence that my theories are wrong, it is as exciting as if the evidence proved them right.
Stargate: SG1
A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, -- a mere heart of stone.
Charles Darwin
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.
Christopher Hitchens
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. .
Oh well ToE it is then
Linear Mode
