| American Politics Forum for political discussion that applies specifically to the United States. |
 | | 
16th May 2012, 06:52 PM
| | Lookin' up!
  
| | Join Date: 9th May 2012
Posts: 373
Blessings: 1,013,498 My Mood 
Reps: 20,222,134,010,003,644 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Genersis  [Proof Pending]
Biology 101
Boy parts fit together with girl parts which can result in reproduction.
Boy parts do not fit together with boy parts nor do girl parts fit together with girl parts and neither attempt to put them together will ever result in the intended purpose of reproduction.
One is biologically natural. One is biologically unnatural. |
16th May 2012, 06:56 PM
| | Unscrewer of the Inscrutable
  
| | Join Date: 1st December 2011
Posts: 1,883
Blessings: 2,176 My Mood 
Reps: 48,631,479,443,142,656 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Markusanthem Homosexuality is unnatural, a crime against nature/biology.
How is homosexuality unnatural when it occurs in many species other then our own? Originally Posted by Markusanthem No one hates homosexuals. We certainly hate the behavior though.
You may not hate homosexuals but to say that there is no bigotry directed towards homosexuals is simply not true. |
16th May 2012, 08:04 PM
| | You will be who you will be. We are our choices.
| | Join Date: 15th April 2012 Location: in a handbasket
Posts: 4,222
Blessings: 1,032,308
Reps: 342,280,341,223,288,640 (power: 342,280,341,223,294) | | Originally Posted by Markusanthem Biology 101
Boy parts fit together with girl parts which can result in reproduction.
Biology 201
Married or not, boy parts fit together with certain other girl parts -- as well as corresponding boy parts -- which can result in an expression of love. Similarly, girl parts can be used in creative fashions with other girl parts to achieve the same result.
If you want verification of this, I direct you to approximately 96.3% of the Internet.
__________________
"Don’t speak to me about your religion; first show it to me in how you treat other people.
Don’t tell me how much you love your God; show me in how much you love all God’s children.
Don’t preach to me your passion for your faith; teach me through your compassion for your neighbors.
In the end, I’m not as interested in what you have to tell or sell as I am in how you choose to live and give."
-- Cory Booker, Mayor of Newark, NJ.
|
16th May 2012, 09:39 PM
|  | Senior Member
41  
| | Join Date: 21st December 2005 Location: Seattle
Posts: 8,363
Blessings: 1,106,591 My Mood
Reps: 350,977,409,135,159,616 (power: 350,977,409,135,175) | | Originally Posted by Markusanthem Biology 101
Boy parts fit together with girl parts which can result in reproduction.
Boy parts do not fit together with boy parts nor do girl parts fit together with girl parts and neither attempt to put them together will ever result in the intended purpose of reproduction.
One is biologically natural. One is biologically unnatural.
A) All sciences describe what is, not what should. Naturalistic fallacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
B) Reproduction is not a requirement to get married.
C) The many Homosexuals with Children show that reproduction is not an issue.
__________________
No silicon heaven? Where would all of the calculators go?
Kryton
Courage is the price that life exacts for granting peace. The soul that knows it not, knows no release from little things; Knows not the livid loneliness of fear, nor mountain hights where bitter joy can hear the sound of wings. How can life grant us boon of living, compensate for dull gray ugliness and pregnant hate unless we dare the soul's dominion? Each time we make a choice, we pay with courage to behold restless day, and count it fair.
Amelia Earhart |
16th May 2012, 11:59 PM
|  | Senior Member
 
 | | Join Date: 17th June 2008
Posts: 1,587
Blessings: 63,322
Reps: 13,391,384,424,600,182 (power: 13,391,384,424,606) | | Originally Posted by Lee52 If gays get marriage rights in the USA, so be it. Just do not force those beliefs on a real Christian Church to recognize and perform said ceremonies,
No one is trying to. So don't worry.
-- A2SG, the separation of church and state protects you here...ironic, isn't it? |
17th May 2012, 12:01 AM
| | Senior Member
| | Join Date: 17th June 2008
Posts: 1,587
Blessings: 63,322
Reps: 13,391,384,424,600,182 (power: 13,391,384,424,606) | | Originally Posted by Markusanthem Biology 101
Boy parts fit together with girl parts which can result in reproduction.
Boy parts do not fit together with boy parts nor do girl parts fit together with girl parts and neither attempt to put them together will ever result in the intended purpose of reproduction.
One is biologically natural. One is biologically unnatural.
Um, a question....
Boy parts fit together with girl parts, that much is true....but they can only result in reproduction 1-5 days a month. Reproduction is IMPOSSIBLE outside of that window.
Care to explain how that fact fits your "sex is for reproduction" theory?
-- A2SG, and yes, I will keep asking if you keep ignoring the question.... |
17th May 2012, 01:56 AM
| | Lookin' up!
| | Join Date: 9th May 2012
Posts: 373
Blessings: 1,013,498 My Mood
Reps: 20,222,134,010,003,644 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by Belk
You missed the point.
Boy parts are naturally made to connect to girl parts and that connection has a specific purpose (reproduction).
It doesn't matter if the reproduction is successful.
Boy parts cannot correctly/naturally connect to boy parts and still serve their purpose.
A person might want to do all manner of things with their boy parts but it doesn't mean that is the original, natural purpose. It also doesn't mean that the rest of us have to give those who wish to engage in unnatural behavior a legal reward for it either. |
17th May 2012, 02:05 AM
| | Senior Member
| | Join Date: 17th June 2008
Posts: 1,587
Blessings: 63,322
Reps: 13,391,384,424,600,182 (power: 13,391,384,424,606) | | Originally Posted by Markusanthem You missed the point.
Boy parts are naturally made to connect to girl parts and that connection has a specific purpose (reproduction).
How can it be the specific purpose if it's IMPOSSIBLE most of the time? It doesn't matter if the reproduction is successful.
Does it matter if reproduction is IMPOSSIBLE?? Boy parts cannot correctly/naturally connect to boy parts and still serve their purpose.
They serve the purpose exactly as well as it does with girls most of the time. There's only a difference 1-5 days a month. A person might want to do all manner of things with their boy parts but it doesn't mean that is the original, natural purpose.
A purpose that is IMPOSSIBLE most of the time. Can you think of anything else that has an "original, natural purpose" that's IMPOSSIBLE most of the time? It also doesn't mean that the rest of us have to give those who wish to engage in unnatural behavior a legal reward for it either.
What reward? Rights aren't a reward the government gives you.
-- A2SG, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.".....  |
17th May 2012, 02:10 AM
| | Lookin' up!
| | Join Date: 9th May 2012
Posts: 373
Blessings: 1,013,498 My Mood
Reps: 20,222,134,010,003,644 (power: 0) | | Originally Posted by A2SG How can it be the specific purpose if it's IMPOSSIBLE most of the time?
Does it matter if reproduction is IMPOSSIBLE??
They serve the purpose exactly as well as it does with girls most of the time. There's only a difference 1-5 days a month.
A purpose that is IMPOSSIBLE most of the time. Can you think of anything else that has an "original, natural purpose" that's IMPOSSIBLE most of the time?
What reward? Rights aren't a reward the government gives you.
-- A2SG, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.".....
Homosexual marriage/sex is against the law.
The American people as a whole lean right and they don't want it which is why since Obama declared he's all for it as the first gay president, he is way down in the polls.
The democrats are in panic mode because Obama went too far.
Homosexuality is unnatural and the American people know it and they don't want it in the public square. |
17th May 2012, 02:22 AM
| | Senior Member
| | Join Date: 17th June 2008
Posts: 1,587
Blessings: 63,322
Reps: 13,391,384,424,600,182 (power: 13,391,384,424,606) | | Originally Posted by Markusanthem Homosexual marriage/sex is against the law.
Same-sex marriage is not against the law where I live (Massachusetts). And homosexual sex is not against the law anywhere. The American people as a whole lean right and they don't want it which is why since Obama declared he's all for it as the first gay president, he is way down in the polls.
His polling numbers are down with people who weren't going to vote for him anyway. They're up among people who are on the fence, especially those who believe in equality.
Your mileage may vary, of course. The democrats are in panic mode because Obama went too far.
No, we're not, and no, he didn't. If anything, as far as this democrat is concerned, he didn't go far enough. A repeal of DOMA would be a good place to start, I'd say. Homosexuality is unnatural and the American people know it and they don't want it in the public square.
You don't speak for the American people, my friend. I'm an American, and you sure as hell don't speak for me.
But, I can't help but notice, you've ignored the point I keep raising, so I'll raise it again:
How can something be the "original, natural purpose" of something when it's IMPOSSIBLE most of the time?
-- A2SG, as to what happens in the public square, try to have heterosexual sex there and tell me how that goes.....
Last edited by A2SG; 17th May 2012 at 03:11 AM.
| | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
| | |
